- Joined
- Jun 5, 2017
- Messages
- 16,330
- Likes
- 70,185
What about the population there?Military option to remove GB from Pakistani map is not only possible but very much achievable
What happens to them?
What about the population there?Military option to remove GB from Pakistani map is not only possible but very much achievable
Going by the famous undisputed theory of diplomacy "“Catch them by the balls and their hearts and mind will follow.”, which ofcourse our Indian army is well versed with... We can.What about the population there?
What happens to them?
India made mince meat of SEATO by cutting Pakistan in half, and America could just stand by and cry.. but India can still benefit from such a setup..SEATO can be dusted out from the dustbin and restarted . This time a two much bigger partners Japan and India compared to last time smaller ones .
By the way, we are unable to silent the adversaries on Western front. Why? Not able to punish them thoroughly. It is just one or two head against one. We are still banana state as far as foreign policy is concerned.A small scale war with an Indian victory or for that matter even a stalemate would have the following advantages:
1) Burial of ghost of 1962
2) Increased dominance and importance in Asia.
3) May bring the end of Xi not necessarily the CCP.
4) Overnight reversal of allegiance of immediate neighboring countries.
5) An overall increase in stature in the world and amongst the international community.
and most importantly.
6) At least 10 years of guaranteed peace along the LAC which could be used to divert resources to our western border to "set right" Pakistan.
No way to silence them, their silencing can be only achieved by breaking them down into 4 pieces nothing less, they will continue to bark unless you break them down into pieces, Indira Gandhi couldn't do it even after Bangladesh, your expectations are way too high and very unrealistic.By the way, we are unable to silent the adversaries on Western front. Why? Not able to punish them thoroughly. It is just one or two head against one. We are still banana state as far as foreign policy is concerned.
By the way, we are unable to silent the adversaries on Western front. Why? Not able to punish them thoroughly. It is just one or two head against one. We are still banana state as far as foreign policy is concerned.
Sir, I think only Chinese are not thinking of OVERDRIVE here, just like ayub khan thinking.Thanks for a response.
Just could not make out what you wished to convey though. Could you perhaps clarify?
So , they will consider us indians ( hindus in Ayubu's case )as sniveling cowardly dark fools and do same mistake as Ayubu did in 1971 probably.Sir, I think only Chinese are not thinking of OVERDRIVE here, just like ayub khan thinking.
Now, you may know and ofcourse chinaman too know, if they lurk here.
Legend has it the balls of the Japanese were vaporized in the bombs that hit Hiroshima and Nagasaki, so nope.
..
...
There are signs that the Japanese are re-growing their balls though, altough I think it will take another decade for them to fully grow under Suga-daddy's rule.
Arre bhai woh Yahya tha but anyway Saale haraam ek hi tarah dikhte hain magar laat jor ki khate hain.So , they will consider us indians ( hindus in Ayubu's case )as sniveling cowardly dark fools and do same mistake as Ayubu did in 1971 probably.
The Islamic invasion of India was not one strike or campaign by green eyed mususlulman men from Arab, turan and khursan ( where ever they came from) .
Arabs attacked in 636 for first time, Prithviraj lost tarain battle in 1192 if iam correct .
Due to further breakdown of Gurjar pratihar after Kannauj triangle period.
Chalukya and rashtra kutra were not there too when khilji expanded south .
If pulakesin 2 were ruling southern india , then you would have seen destruction of Delhi by chalukyas .
Ayub was a idiot , the chinese think us as weak and pea brained idiots .
Now let them freeze in winter campaign by general ladakh singh winter .
It's not the size of the chest that matters. It's the size of the balls - 56 inches!Whenever MEA hits a mental barrier and unable to think out of the box, it goes back to decades old tried and tested policy of bootlicking/appeasement.
If at all the MEA does decide to react, i can bet that it will be "Differences arising from perceptions about the LAC.It's not the size of the chest that matters. It's the size of the balls - 56 inches!
Sugar daddy US will never let that happen. Pakis are their necessary evil. During IG's time it was virtually impossible to do that... I think even breaking Pakistan that time was huge.No way to silence them, their silencing can be only achieved by breaking them down into 4 pieces nothing less, they will continue to bark unless you break them down into pieces, Indira Gandhi couldn't do it even after Bangladesh, your expectations are way too high and very unrealistic.
Likely nothing. Twitter noise is not necessarily policy.Something is cooking I think, with all the drama regarding Taiwan happening in India and from Taiwanese Govt twitter handles
Breaking Pakistan into pieces is unlikely to be GOI policy.Sugar daddy US will never let that happen. Pakis are their necessary evil. During IG's time it was virtually impossible to do that... I think even breaking Pakistan that time was huge.
Situation now is much favourable but still re claiming PoK or GB should be our next goal to hurt China & Pak at the same time. Something that can be negotiated with US too. It will take its pound of flesh too but we can manage it I think.
Likely nothing. Twitter noise is not necessarily policy.
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
India-China 2020 Border Dispute - Military and Strategic Discussion | Indian Army | 19501 | ||
V | Non-Military implications of India-China Standoff 2020 | China | 61 | |
Memes & Jokes India China Standoff 2020 | Members Corner | 334 | ||
India to overtake China in 2020: Swaminathan Aiyar | Economy & Infrastructure | 33 |