LETHALFORCE
New Member
- Joined
- Feb 16, 2009
- Messages
- 29,968
- Likes
- 48,929
![United-States Country flag](https://defenceforumindia.com/misc/flags/shiny/32/United-States.png)
His medication is bracketed in criminal offence.Any further increase in dosage to joe's medication will be fatal
That is fine. But what do you do in mountains. And what about the bridges which are rated for lower weight. About 70% of our infra is not suitable to carry such a huge weight.yes, but its also about weight distribution. arjun mk1a has low weight distribution per sq. inch on its track. the possibility of t90 getting stuck is higher when compared to arjun.
All ok but Canada is a pussy, does not fit in that list.![]()
America must build a coalition to counter China’s accelerating aggression
The U.S. needs to actively build a multinational coalition to counter China, and fast, writes David Geaney.www.defensenews.com
America must build a coalition to counter China’s accelerating aggression
U.S. should embrace a multilateral approach, encompassing eight key political forces: Australia, ASEAN, Canada, India, Japan, Korea, the U.K., and the E.U.
few others too , not specifyingAll ok but Canada is a pussy, does not fit in that list.
Quad of the level of NATO will provide enough weight. Both strategic and economic. Too many countries will lead to khichdi. That will be counterproductive.few others too , not specifying
All ok but Canada is a pussy, does not fit in that list.
I think many nations are on this list because of US and NATO?Quad of the level of NATO will provide enough weight. Both strategic and economic. Too many countries will lead to khichdi. That will be counterproductive.
Once the quad stabilises and 'objectives' achieved, it should open to other willing countries. After all they will be sharing some burden too.Quad of the level of NATO will provide enough weight. Both strategic and economic. Too many countries will lead to khichdi. That will be counterproductive.
No it would degenerate like NATO has, its only US military power that deters anyone from attacking NATO homeland.. The Europeans have outsourced their security to US, and have stripped down their own militaries..Once the quad stabilises and 'objectives' achieved, it should open to other willing countries. After all they will be sharing some burden too.
Quad is gonna become the most powerful military alliance the world ever produced with 5 million front line soldiers, and with 5th Gen. tech airforce. But it need to bring into in real sense, not just on the paper.Quad of the level of NATO will provide enough weight. Both strategic and economic. Too many countries will lead to khichdi. That will be counterproductive.
I don't think it would degenerate you have demographics in the QUAD that are much betterNo it would degenerate like NATO has, its only US military power that deters anyone from attacking NATO homeland.. The Europeans have outsourced their security to US, and have stripped down their own militaries..
Every system degenerates unless it evolves. Yes NATO. Look at UN too. But it dosen't mean that there shouldn't be any system(s) at all.No it would degenerate like NATO has, its only US military power that deters anyone from attacking NATO homeland.. The Europeans have outsourced their security to US, and have stripped down their own militaries..
Indian maal ke liye paisa nahi hai re baba. Nahi to we would have fielded more lch for high altitude warfare.yes, but its also about weight distribution. arjun mk1a has low weight distribution per sq. inch on its track. the possibility of t90 getting stuck is higher when compared to arjun.
I wonder why GOI & MEA can't see what the folks here can see. I don't expect GOI to say this in public but their actions should reflect their understanding. We know that we are dependent on Russian Arms, half of the Indian Air-Force is Russian, 95% of Tank fleet is Russian, Nuclear Submarine development had Russian assistance. So they do have leverage on us but even China is dependent on Russia for frontline fighters usable in Ladakh.Let us look at the timeline.
Russia intelligence reports tell India that chinese are just having a exercise and we have nothing too worry about.
Russias wanting to stay neutral.
Delay of s-400
Russia wanting de-escalation.
Russian exercise with china and pakistan.
Moscow pact where we decide on the 5 point meet.
There is too much involvement of russia from the start almost as if the Chinese planned for this.
Does that mean China has sabotaged our POJK plan ? I feel China has done all this to prevent us from Capturing Gilgit Baltistan from where the CPEC passes throughIndian maal ke liye paisa nahi hai re baba. Nahi to we would have fielded more lch for high altitude warfare.
War ke liye babu log ke pass jigra nahi hai or south block is convinced no good outcome from conflict for us. Remember the result of status quo is IA deployed on freezing LAC for next 40-50 years. But I will repeat modi is most unpredictable w.r.t to miltary option among all politicians. Pehle border road thik kiya hai, after that 370 was revoked, they would have known what comes next but chinese surprised with pandemic.
Taking back our territories is an objective too not just a plan. A plan can be countered (sabotage gives too much credit to the munchers) by certain actions. Those actions would result in a different course of action being taken by us. But our objective remains the same.Does that mean China has sabotaged our POJK plan ? I feel China has done all this to prevent us from Capturing Gilgit Baltistan from where the CPEC passes through
Confidence Building my ass ! These MEA babus keep bandying this term around. The only confidence it builds is that of the enemy ! That we will never respond to his agression.In fact these confidence building measures were in place when Chinese moved the LAC westward at a few places like Fingers area and in Despang. A firefight may be the solution.
It will also be economic gains for India.. They will go back with substantial gains. America, politically and economically. India, geographically and politically.
Does that mean China has sabotaged our POJK plan ? I feel China has done all this to prevent us from Capturing Gilgit Baltistan from where the CPEC passes through
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
India-China 2020 Border Dispute - Military and Strategic Discussion | Indian Army | 19501 | |
V | Non-Military implications of India-China Standoff 2020 | China | 61 | |
![]() |
Memes & Jokes India China Standoff 2020 | Members Corner | 334 | |
![]() |
India to overtake China in 2020: Swaminathan Aiyar | Economy & Infrastructure | 33 |