Xiaomi also has plenty of critics in China. One is that it has lost too much of its stake to American companies. South Korea's Samsung is mostly owned by American capital.The second is that it has invested too locally in India. Xiaomi's factories and components in India are localized too much. Only a fraction of the profits are made, and the rest stays in India.
Some Chinese infrastructure companies are also criticized by many people,Generally speaking, Western companies will have a technology ladder, the best technology will be used in the West, outdated technology will be used in developing countries,Even if developing countries have learned, they have only learned the technology of decades ago to maintain their technological advantages,Look at the cars being sold in India, for example,Most of them are old models.
But Chinese infrastructure companies have always used the latest technology to build coal-fired power plants in India,For example, Shandong Electric Power Construction Company SEPCO,Built many state-of-the-art power plant in India worth tens of billions of dollars.
In China, there are also many criticisms of these enterprises.
I dont think India allows Chinese companies to participate in infrastructure sectors. There was a slew of cancellation of Chinese contracts in Railways, Roads etc. Not sure whether the government allowed SEPCO to build plants. India has good plant building companies like L&T, BHEL, Reliance, Jindal, Adani, HCC etc...Also the government builds its own nuclear power plants - so I dont see the need to pay foreign exchange to Chinese companies. Maybe SEPCO owns stake in some Indian power companies but I doubt they built any. There has been very little participation of Chinese companies in India's infrastructure sector.
The major concern with China is its building standards are not good, and definitely several grades behind the West/Japan/Singapore/S.Korea/Taiwan etc. For instance, China has far less LEED certified buildings than it should be. Also during the rains/floods of last year, this year etc., there has been several massive leaks in major landmarks including the "iconic" Shanghai Tower. We all know about the shaking building in Shenzhen. I also saw several videos where the quality of construction is pathetic even in top cities with inner walls peeling off, smashed glass windows etc.
Even in HSR I am not all that impressed. Currently China's HSR takes about 8 hours to travel a distance of 2200 KM or slightly less than 300 KMPH average. However a semi HSR at 220KMPH average speed probably a 50% cheaper cost would have traveled the same kilometers in ten hours - two hours more but well within an overnight travel goal. So, China opted for hugely wasteful expenditure - this does not give confidence that Chinese take profitable construction decisions, and are more interested in inflating the construction bill so corrupt CCP officials and connected persons can pocket a lot of bribe moneys.
I dont know if "overbuilld-inflate construction costs-pocket bribe moneys" corruption model would ever arrive in India for rapid, wasteful construction China-style to take place. I think not as the styles are different.