- Joined
- Jul 12, 2014
- Messages
- 31,938
- Likes
- 148,176
this must have happened to the first wave of Indian immigrants who went there as doctors in 70's and 80's as well.Bhai, I have been observing this trend for over a decade now. I have been in C-Suite meetings where the Indian origin directors have been quickly dismissed while the American origin (both, whites and non-whites born and raised in the US) have carried on lengthy discussions of their project status in the same meetings.
I was also a bystander in a debate between an expert (LPIC-1 certified) Linux admin of Indian origin and a shit-for-brains American born & raised Latino Windows engineer, and just on the prowess of the language, the Indian was out argued by this numb nut who spent all his life clicking around the Windows GUI.
This is precisely also why the American sales/marketing person is leaps and bounds ahead of the non-native-English speaking counterpart.
The reason Indians and some other non-native English speaking people get noticed is because many bosses have seen and experienced the fact that no one can outwork Indians/Chinese/Vietnamese. The pakis in fact have it worse, they are largely unskilled, no work ethic and cant speak the language as much as Indians.
PS: I have seen similar comments about Poles and even in one small project that had three Russian devs - and the folks from both of these countries have far better quality than the regular American born employee.
Trust me, the ability to communicate in the language is more than 70% of the effort if you want to show yourself as smart in the US.
do the individuals who are the receiving end of this, have an issue with this?
by the way this happens in India as well, real test happens in crux situations. it's the management's loss if they don't know how to evaluate talent.
in my case, i take vicarious pleasure in "punishing" these bluffers without them even realising it.