- Joined
- Dec 24, 2015
- Messages
- 6,510
- Likes
- 7,217
So what about the 175 $million ? it's an official information.The intitial batch was 132 mn dollar + the price dropped later in series production for F-35 A.
So what about the 175 $million ? it's an official information.The intitial batch was 132 mn dollar + the price dropped later in series production for F-35 A.
That's a 10 year old news, LM is still waiting for that suit. You're more senile by the day.Lockheed Martin will face whistle-blower lawsuit for F-35 work
It's about the F35 FBW .......
"Davis filed the lawsuit in 2006, saying Lockheed violated the federal False Claims Act by charging the government for developing flight control software for the F-35 that was potentially unsafe because it did not follow guidelines and practices adopted by industry and the Defense Department. "
interesting !
But the F35 that crashed because of a overflow memory in FBW is only a couple of day late, my idiot fellow.That's a 10 year old news, LM is still waiting for that suit. You're more senile by the day.
source please?Qatar made a formal request for the F-35 too, UAE, rumors are Saudi will join the Peace Deal, also interested in F-35.
There is no need of source ME block have been asking for F-35 for long but they are offered only the teen series or Typhoon and Rafale from Europe .source please?
or it is just another fantasm or your old small brain...
I am not sure about the source but there are lot of equipments that goes alongwith. But it's surprising while you are ready to take figures from this source while official known sources which quoted the revised price just under 80mn for a F-35 A doesn't ring any bell.So what about the 175 $million ? it's an official information.
The F35 program price is full of black holes....I am not sure about the source but there are lot of equipments that goes alongwith. But it's surprising while you are ready to take figures from this source while official known sources which quoted the revised price just under 80mn for a F-35 A doesn't ring any bell.
source please?
or it is just another fantasm or your old small brain...
The crash in 2019 is finally Pilot error and that's a fact.But the F35 that crashed because of a overflow memory in FBW is only a couple of day late, my idiot fellow.
Not only. FBW flaws also. and some more maybe. A too complicated bird for a single pilot? why not.The crash in 2019 is finally Pilot error and that's a fact.
This happened when he bounced off the tarmac at 50 knots (92.5km) faster than required landing speed at a much shallower AoA of 5.2 degrees instead of 13 degrees. Do we expect that any bird even survives at such conditions?Not only. FBW flaws also. and some more maybe. A too complicated bird for a single pilot? why not.
"MP attempted to reestablish a landing attitude after touch down. The aircraft landing lasted approximately five seconds before the MP elected to eject. Upon touch down the MP initially attempted to dampen the rapid rise of the nose produced by the first bounce. The MP’s initial reaction was consistent with attempting to recover from a bounce and set a landing attitude.However, the MP’s stick inputs quickly fell out of synch with the aircraft pitch oscillations and control cycles initiated by the weight on wheels. This resulted in multiple conflicting flight control inputs. In the presence of large and aggressive stick inputs the flight control system, based on its Control Law (CLAW) logic, became saturated and unresponsive, and ultimately biased the flight control surfaces toward nose down."
Eglin F-35 Crash Blamed on Landing Speed, but Software, Helmet, Oxygen Also Faulted | Air & Space Forces Magazine
Excessive landing speed primarily caused the May 19 crash of an F-35A at Eglin Air Force Base, Fla., though faulty flight control logic, the helmet mounted display, the jet's oxygen system, and improper training and were all contributing factors, according to an Air Force investigation.www.airforcemag.com
The blame is not officialy put on the sole pilot. so some things are wrong with the planes also.This happened when he bounced off the tarmac at 50 knots (92.5km) faster than required landing speed at a much shallower AoA of 5.2 degrees instead of 13 degrees. Do we expect that any bird even survives at such conditions?
The blame is not officialy put on the sole pilot. so some things are wrong with the planes also.
There is mainly a low landing speed. Not a upper limit.Primarily the helmet (older gen, known issues, not deemed important to fix), the aircraft suffered essentially a crash landing. Show me one example of a fighter aircraft that survived such a harsh landing? Normal landing speed of the F-35 is around 150 kts or 277kmph. The pilot landed at 373kmph, a good 100 km over speed and 7.8 degrees in AoA difference. One shouldn't be expecting miracles at such speeds.
MP’s stick inputs quickly fell out of synch with the aircraft pitch oscillations and control cycles initiated by the weight on wheels. This resulted in multiple conflicting flight control inputs. In the presence of large and aggressive stick inputs the flight control system, based on its Control Law (CLAW) logic, became saturated and unresponsive, and ultimately biased the flight control surfaces toward nose down
USN is set for a while, a 6th gen carrier based jet needs a lot more work and thought process, they're in no rush. NGAD is mainly an USAF program to eventually replace Raptor. Development to operational status is 10-15 year process.Why US Navy Has ‘Shot-Down’ Proposal To Invest In 6th-Gen Fighters & Will Stick To F-18 Super Hornets & F-35 Jets?
USN was never a fan of the F35.....
Why US Navy Has 'Shot-Down' Proposal To Invest In 6th-Gen Fighters & Will Stick To F-18 Super Hornets & F-35 Jets?
The United States currently leads the race in the development of the most competent fighter jets on the face of the planet, boasting the likes of the stealthy pair of F-35 Lightning II and F-22 Raptors ably supported by F-16s and F-15 Eagles. Why Pentagon’s Plan For Lightweight Aircraft Carrier...eurasiantimes.com