- Joined
- Nov 22, 2015
- Messages
- 507
- Likes
- 1,967
You forgot to add pakistan army trials too, I mean must give to porks and ask them "how's the ATAGS?" with whiskey in one hand and Mithai in other hand.Army should try an under water trials and space trails too we should do everything
I mean we need validation from them too.
This is systematically complete misuse of this government LOOOOOONG HAND method and it's patience that army is jumping here and there.
These army guys really, what can I say about them, we are all following ATAGS development since it's inception, it was said Army too was there in the loop when the guns were being made along with academia and private players.
Questions must be asked about if the weight issue was so important why army didn't put titanium use mandatory? Or don't they know the titanium use will increase the cost.
It's similar to sr-71 and mig-25 comparison, either you choose numbers or performance, then too weight is 18 tons and if I am not wrong weight means mobility problems for that I say ATAGS has proved itself in sikkim as per the print article.
Now regarding performance ELBIT CLAIMED firing capability and ATAGS firing capability, well to that question I will give example of f-18 and attach this old video
Regarding performances of f-18 at that time and today, we need not pressurize our minds to where and at what position f-18 is today.
Another example is of ofcourse merkava, Army guys know whatever merkava is today is because of Israelis sticking with their weapon.
So, testing and capability improvements will happen incrementally not hundred percent today.
You all guys know why we are asking and fighting over these things is because we don't know what was army primary requirement, do they wanted mountain gun or desert gun or self propelled gun.
If you want all then the best material for construction is ofcourse steel and not titanium alloy, if you want to keep the cost down.
Regarding cost, well in that government is famous we all know what happened with tejas,so army need not worry about that.
Let kalyani and Tata worry about that.
Army cannot run now and ofcourse not after CDS sir said this.
Will win war through indigenous weapons in future: CDS Gen Bipin Rawat
While addressing the event at Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) in the national capital on December 18, Chief of Defence Staff (CDS) General Bipin Rawat said, “This time, we are witnessing that our private industry is also motivated, they need your support.” “I feel that in...
m.economictimes.com
Self-reliance in defence is 'strategic necessity', says Army chief Naravane
Our external dependence for weapons and ammunition creates vulnerabilities in times of crisis, M.M. Naravane said.Encouraging the private industry to take advantage of the government's reform measures to boost domestic defence production, he said the Army was strongly committed to support them
www.livemint.com
I will end with the BASIC OF CHOOSING INDIGENOUS WEAPON is SIMPLE THAT YOU CHOOSE IT DESPITE IT'S SHORT COMING and heck ATAGS is not even short comer here barring it's so called always weight issue by army.
Let's leave that to army and industry engineers, army should focus on how to win the war with indigenous weapons if it want INDIA to be a respectful power in future.
Otherwise, the same situation of KADI NINDA running TO RUSSIA AND ISRAEL WHEN CHONGS WERE AT OUR NECK DURING PREVIOUS YEAR will always arise, whether you do FULL TOT OR HALF TOT joke.