DRDO, PSU and Private Defence Sector News

Indx TechStyle

Kitty mod
New Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2015
Messages
18,416
Likes
56,946
Country flag
Who cares what US will say?:blah: International diplomacy doesn't work from point of weakness. After a successful A6 test US and west will stand in line to get India on their side.
International diplomacy runs on brains as well. Why the hell we need to test one when we don't have any problem with countries sitting on other side of world.

A country who can send a probe to Moon can reach any point on earth. Demonstrating an ICBM is direct power projection and threatening posture.
By your own logic that too will attract US hostility No?
Any SLBM below 8,000kms won't.

At the first place, it would rather create a situation of confusion that could be misinterpreted very well by their intelligent President Trump.
ICBMs and SLBMs are for different purpose.

ICBMs are for first strike on enemy where SLBMs are for additional strikes (survivability)
SLBMs are just a naval analog of ICBMs that can be hidden under water.
Both ICBMs & SLBMs can be used for pre emptive as well as second strike.
Agni 6 will give us a global range nuclear umbrella and an extremely depressed trajectory against china. Not to mention diplomatic benefits and respect as a global power.
This is just not the right day. However, testing a global ICBM will make little difference to India's status who already has sufficient strategic wonders to show, testing at this period of time will bring only backlash.
ICBMs don't make any country great. They have reasons to get tested.
 

Cutting Edge 2

Space Power
New Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2017
Messages
984
Likes
1,969
International diplomacy runs on brains as well. Why the hell we need to test one when we don't have any problem with countries sitting on other side of world.

A country who can send a probe to Moon can reach any point on earth. Demonstrating an ICBM is direct power projection and threatening posture.

Any SLBM below 8,000kms won't.

At the first place, it would rather create a situation of confusion that could be misinterpreted very well by their intelligent President Trump.

SLBMs are just a naval analog of ICBMs that can be hidden under water.
Both ICBMs & SLBMs can be used for pre emptive as well as second strike.

This is just not the right day. However, testing a global ICBM will make little difference to India's status who already has sufficient strategic wonders to show, testing at this period of time will bring only backlash.
ICBMs don't make any country great. They have reasons to get tested.
Your argument comes from old colonial narrative of what west thinks. China tested their ICBMs without worrying about what west may think and west (US) tried their head over their heels to get China on their side. Heck even NoKo recently tested some long range missiles and suddenly hawkish US wants to resolve Korean issue by dialog.

We are on much better grounds (diplomatically) then both China and NoKo. Also we are a member of MTCR. A6 test may draw some criticism but nothing like what you might have imagined.

Coming to SLBMs, They too are becoming replacement for ICBMs (UK, France) but land based missile has its own pros. Yes we need a strong SLBM fleet but also equally important is our ICBMs as well. For a great emerging power like India one isn't substitute for another.
 

no smoking

New Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2009
Messages
5,057
Likes
2,353
Country flag
After a successful A6 test US and west will stand in line to get India on their side.
On the contrast, they will simply add India's ICBM into their target lists.

Agni 6 will give us a global range nuclear umbrella
Without MT warhead, the Agni-6 is basically meaningless for global range nuclear umbrella unless India wants to compete with Russia/US with numbers.

and an extremely depressed trajectory against china.
Sorry, with those radars on Himalayas, China can see Indian missile launching within 30 seconds. Depressed trajectory is the waste of energy against China.
 

Indx TechStyle

Kitty mod
New Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2015
Messages
18,416
Likes
56,946
Country flag
Your argument comes from old colonial narrative of what west thinks.
:doh::doh::doh::doh:
Seriously, how retarded you are. My colonial mindset? Can't you see how much China is bleeding these days? Why would you want to irk west so early. At least ley India catch up in the league of US, Russia & China.

Just choosing not to dance like North Korea due to situation isn't colonial mindset.
China tested their ICBMs without worrying about what west may think and west (US) tried their head over their heels to get China on their side. Heck even NoKo recently tested some long range missiles and suddenly hawkish US wants to resolve Korean issue by dialog.
China and NoKo tested when they had direct hostilities with west.

We also were facing similar situation since late 60s and 70s. Did we test at that time? Heck no. Case is different that we were working on one but technological limitations didn't allow us at that time.
We are on much better grounds (diplomatically) then both China and NoKo.
Than NoKo, not China.
Also we are a member of MTCR.
Being a member of MTCR doesn't make any difference. By violating HCoC, you'll listen to so many abuses.
A6 test may draw some criticism but nothing like what you might have imagined.
Testing an ICBM is demonstration of posture directly and not what you are thinking.

Entire world knows that India has enough techs to double the range of its Agni-5 by adding stages or bigger rocket motors. But they day we start validating these technologies, someone will ask why? Obviously, West will put his in same list as that of Russia, China & Iran.

Nobody tests missiles to score brownies in eyes of local public, but for requirements and geopolitical postures. If you think that space agencies and defense projects run for public image, you are too naive.
Coming to SLBMs, They too are becoming replacement for ICBMs (UK, France) but land based missile has its own pros. Yes we need a strong SLBM fleet but also equally important is our ICBMs as well. For a great emerging power like India one isn't substitute for another.
We operate them on all platforms. Silos, TELs, submarines and ships. India will not substitute any of system, no matter what fanboys think here.
I said no need to test any missile exceeding 10,000 kms range for next 10 years.
Sorry, with those radars on Himalayas, China can see Indian missile launching within 30 seconds. Depressed trajectory is the waste of energy against China.
I think all Indian long range ballistic missiles are being validated with lofted trajectories lately. What Chinese ballistic missile defense system is upto?
 

Bhadra

New Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2011
Messages
11,991
Likes
23,756
Country flag
You mean to say on tibetan plateau or you people decided Himalayas is also some lost CHINA TERRITORY.
It is not you people decided.....

It is you who should know something better than a school boy about Sino -Indian boundary disputes....

:pound::pound::pound:
 

Chinmoy

New Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2015
Messages
8,930
Likes
23,094
Country flag
Unnecessarily provoking US isn't needed yet. There will be time when after knocking China down or Indian alliance with PRC, US will be hostile to India and India will show middle finger to west. That time is yet to come.
Our SLBMs already give us virtual global missile strike capabilities.
A6 would be there. But A6 would not be about increasing the range, rather payload. Expect the MIRVd Agni to be A6.
Or better still, a 10k km range SLBM to be that. But for that, we would also need to keep an eye on our subs and there dimensions.
 

no smoking

New Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2009
Messages
5,057
Likes
2,353
Country flag
We also were facing similar situation since late 60s and 70s. Did we test at that time? Heck no. Case is different that we were working on one but technological limitations didn't allow us at that time.

Are you kidding me? From 60s to 70s, the tech & science cooperation between India and West was never stopped until 1974. From nuclear program to space tech, the assistance from West to India in the period was the kind of the benefit that Chinese can imagine in their dream.


I think all Indian long range ballistic missiles are being validated with lofted trajectories lately.

We are talking about DEPRESSED trajectory not lofted trajectories.


What Chinese ballistic missile defense system is upto?

It got nothing to do with Chinese ballistic missile defence system. The purpose of depressed trajectory is to shorter the enemy’s warning time by lowering the flying height of missile to avoid early warning radar and decreasing flying time.


In the case of India vs China, those radars on the top of mountains can minimise the effect of earth’s curvature significantly. Also, the Tibet provides the best buffer zone for Chinese defence.
 

Indx TechStyle

Kitty mod
New Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2015
Messages
18,416
Likes
56,946
Country flag
Are you kidding me? From 60s to 70s, the tech & science cooperation between India and West was never stopped until 1974. From nuclear program to space tech,
India had general assistance in general techs. Not anything major strategic unlike nuclear where India used offset technologies for nukes.

Real space corporation started in late 80s.
the assistance from West to India in the period was the kind of the benefit that Chinese can imagine in their dream.
Factually incorrect. Assistance from USSR China received in formative decades and same from US since started to pitch China to balance USSR, is the tech that any country in world can only dream of!

Instead of downplaying and ignoring foreign roles in Chinese capabilities, just go and rummage through the history. From space tech, aerospace, nuclear and missile systems. Everywhere!
We are talking about DEPRESSED trajectory not lofted trajectories.
We were talking about missiles, not their trajectories. Guess why I mentioned lofted trajectories?
It got nothing to do with Chinese ballistic missile defence system.
If China can intercept a satellite at 800kms altitude, it can intercept a BM too.

I'm not much aware about Chinese ABM program, that's why I'm asking.
The purpose of depressed trajectory is to shorter the enemy’s warning time by lowering the flying height of missile to avoid early warning radar and decreasing flying time.
Cruise missiles are better deal for that purpose. MIRVs need lofted trajectories. Moreover, interception at high altitude is difficult as well.
 

no smoking

New Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2009
Messages
5,057
Likes
2,353
Country flag
India had general assistance in general techs. Not anything major strategic unlike nuclear where India used offset technologies for nukes.
Well, no one is questioning how India developed the nukes on her own. I just pointed out your BS that India was facing the similar sanction that NOK and China suffered. In last 60s and 70s, West may not treat India as an ally, but definitely not an enemy.

Real space corporation started in late 80s.
American doesn't agree with you.
https://in.usembassy.gov/bringing-u...india-richard-verma-at-the-orf-kalpana-chawl/

Factually incorrect. Assistance from USSR China received in formative decades and same from US since started to pitch China to balance USSR, is the tech that any country in world can only dream of!
Sure, name some techs which Chinese received from US that any country in the world can only dream of.


We were talking about missiles, not their trajectories. Guess why I mentioned lofted trajectories?
But I was talking about Mr Cutting Edge's trajectories here not missile. I don't understand why you bring lofted trajectories here. You don't even understand why you shouldn't mention lofted trajectories here.


Cruise missiles are better deal for that purpose.
No cruise missile works in different scenario, has its own disadvantage.

MIRVs need lofted trajectories.
You tell you that? MIRVs is related to the missile design, got nothing to do with lofted trajectory.

Moreover, interception at high altitude is difficult as well.
Well, increasing apogee doesn't bring more difficulty.
 

Indx TechStyle

Kitty mod
New Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2015
Messages
18,416
Likes
56,946
Country flag
Well, no one is questioning how India developed the nukes on her own. I just pointed out your BS that India was facing the similar sanction that NOK and China suffered. In last 60s and 70s, West may not treat India as an ally, but definitely not an enemy.
Moderately hostile yet.
It was diplomatically against India throughout most of history. Be it after Portugal war or them sending 7th fleet after 1971.
Hit your head hard in wall. Those were damned sounding rockets used by a number of countries. Buying and firing them into space doesn't make you make strides in space program. We have a neighbor who did same.

I used the word "real" corporation for a reason. India's modern rocket tech is based on French tech, not American.
Sure, name some techs which Chinese received from US that any country in the world can only dream of.
February 15, 1996. A Chinese Long March 3B carrying a $200 million Loral satellite explodes 22 seconds after lilftoff.

March 14, 1996. President Clinton shifts control over regulating the export of communications satellites from the State Dept. which was primarily concerned with national security aspects of such exports, to the Commerce Dept., which is concerned with the economic benefits.

May 10, 1996. The Loral-led review commission investigating the February rocket explosion completes and passes on to Chinese officials its report, which according to the April 13, 1998 New York Times, discusses “sensitive aspects of the rocket’s guidance and control systems, which is an area of weakness in China’s missile programs.” The New York Times says that a Pentagon report concludes that, as a result of this technology transfer, “United States national security has been harmed”.

May 23, 1996. President Clinton calls for renewal of MFN for China, saying that renewal would not be “a referendum on all China’s policies,” but “a vote for America’s interests.”

June 8, 1996. China conducts an underground nuclear test.

July 21, 1996. Johnny Chung, according to the New York Times, brings Liu Chao-ying to two DNC fundraisers, including a $25,000 per couple dinner. Liu Chao-ying is a Lieutenant Colonel in the People’s Liberation Army and an executive at China Aerospace, which owns the Great Wall Industry Corp. that makes Long March rockets. Her father is the top commander of Chinese military forces. The New York Times says that Chung has told the Justice Dept. that Liu gave him the better part of $100,000 he contributed to the DNC in the latter part of 1996, and that the source of the money was the PLA.

July 29, 1996. China declares a moratorium on nuclear testing after conducting another nuclear test.

August 8, 1996. According to AP, Clinton meets again with Long Beach officials to advocate turning over the naval base to COSCO.

September 24, 1996. At the UN, President Clinton joins with the foreign ministers of China, France, Russia and Great Britain in signing the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty forbidding all testing of nuclear weapons.

November 5, 1996. President Clinton wins reelection. According to the Center for Responsive Politics, the single largest Democratic donor during the election cycle was Loral CEO Bernard Schwartz, who gave $632,000 in ‘soft money’ to the Democratic Party between 1995 and 1996. The State Dept. issues regulations shifting responsibility for satellite launching licenses to the Commerce Dept.

January 1997. The Panamanian government awards the contract to operate the Atlantic and Pacific ports of the Panama Canal to a Hong Kong company, Hutchison Whampoa. China takes control of Hong Kong six months later. The United States, which is set to relinquish control of the canal next year, does not protest.

March 25, 1997. While in Beijing for a meeting with Premier Li Peng and President Jiang Zemin, Vice President Gore attends signing ceremonies for Boeing’s $685 million sale of five jetliners to China’s state-owned Civil Aviation Administration as well as a $1.3 billion joint venture between General Motors and China’s state-owned Shanghai Automotive Industry Corp.

May 1997. According to the April 13, 1998 New York Times, a classified Pentagon report reveals that Hughes and Loral scientists “had turned over expertise that significantly improved the reliability of China’s nuclear missiles” following the February 1996 rocket explosion. Hughes and Loral deny the New York Times report when it is published in 1998.

May 19, 1997. President Clinton announces that he will authorize MFN renewal for China.

October 1997. Chinese President Jiang Zemin makes a state visit to the United States. During the trip, he stops at a Hughes site to discuss satellites.

January 15, 1998. After China promises that it will no longer aid Iran’s nuclear program, President Clinton certifies that China is a reliable partner for nuclear technology exchange.

February 19, 1998. Despite opposition from the Justice Dept, President Clinton signs a waiver approving the launch of a Loral satellite from a Chinese rocket and reportedly authorizing the transfer of the same type of technology that the Pentagon said had “harmed” US security and that the Justice Dept. was investigation Loral and Hughes for their illegally transferring in 1996.
Bill Clinton was highly generous in signing wavers that allowed critical space related tech to be transferred to China between 1996-1999, despite the reservations of the intel and security agencies.

The cap on tech transfer was lifted after the first of the Long March rockets exploded in 1996.

http://www.whiteoutpress.com/timeless/how-china-conquered-america746/

And I don't have to bring and search lot lot things. Most of Chinese aerospace and even automotive industry is based of Soviet ones. Later on American. There would surely be transfers of some other techs, we will never come to know about probably.
Simply, Chinese economy, industry and R&D sector was not so well positioned, in fact it being a sick giant like India in previous century. There would be no logic to believe that China just came out of all that suddenly for no reason.
But I was talking about Mr Cutting Edge's trajectories here not missile. I don't understand why you bring lofted trajectories here. You don't even understand why you shouldn't mention lofted trajectories here.
My bad.
No cruise missile works in different scenario, has its own disadvantage.
It being intercepted by CIWS and shorter range.
Advantage it gives is of better stealth.
You tell you that? MIRVs is related to the missile design, got nothing to do with lofted trajectory.
Separation needs an altitude of at least 500kms.
Well, increasing apogee doesn't bring more difficulty.
It does, there is a zone beyond which and below which interceptions are difficult.
 

Prashant12

New Member
Joined
Aug 9, 2014
Messages
3,027
Likes
15,002
Country flag
Homegrown BEL system to ring death knell for rogue drones


Bengaluru: Rogue unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) could find its nemesis in homegrown Drone Guard System (DGS) being developed by Bharat Electronics Ltd (BEL).

The DGS was first unveiled during the DefExpo held in Chennai in 2018 and later during Aero India held in Bengaluru 2019.

Speaking to Onmanorama on Saturday, on the sidelines of the Annual BEL press conference here, Mahesh V, Director (Research and Development) said any intruding drones could be brought down with the help of DGS.

“Rogue drones coming towards any vital installations can be brought down with our system. It employs soft-kill to bring down the intruder drone or GPS-spoofing to get it down to a specified place," Mahesh said.

An electro-optic sensor, a communication system for interception and jamming and a radar are part of the DGS, mainly developed to protect vital installations.

“We developed the DGS with our own resources and made two versions. A demonstration was shown to the Indian Army. The user wants some more additions and we are working on the same,” Mahesh said.

DGS is a portable unit with FMCW (frequency modulated continuous wave) radar and a communication jammer capable of taking on both uplink and downlink networks. It has an electro optic sensor onboard aiding the missions.

BEL says they are now working on GPS-spoofing for DGS, so as to ‘confuse’ the intruder drone and bring it to a particular area.

The Central Research Laboratories of BEL have been given enough finds to work on areas including artificial intelligence, robotics, data science and homeland security.

“We are offering the users a best system in the form of DGS that can detect, track and neutralise any drones invading into critical assets. The system can also be mounted on a vehicle,” Mahesh added.

https://english.manoramaonline.com/news/nation/2019/06/01/bel-death-knell-rogue-drones.html
 

Bhadra

New Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2011
Messages
11,991
Likes
23,756
Country flag
...........................................................
 

no smoking

New Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2009
Messages
5,057
Likes
2,353
Country flag
Moderately hostile yet.

It was diplomatically against India throughout most of history. Be it after Portugal war or them sending 7th fleet after 1971.

That is very funny, diplomatically hostile? Wow, that was not what Chinese received in 1960s-1970s or NOK has been facing from 1990s. India only confronted 7th fleet for couple of months, both China and NOK had to deal with US fleet for decades. In some cases, their fighter jets started shooting each other. In one word: comparing to the pressure that Chinese and Korean resisted, the hostility on India was nothing.



Hit your head hard in wall. Those were damned sounding rockets used by a number of countries. Buying and firing them into space doesn't make you make strides in space program. We have a neighbor who did same.

By firing these rockets, Indian scientists were able to work with the best scientists from the most advanced space exploring countries: gain the first-hand experience of how they process/organize the experiment. In the meantime, India can also buy the key checking, maintenance, surveillance equipment from these countries continuously. Otherwise, it will take India 5-10 years to build her own. And we don’t even need to mention those trainings that Indian scientists received under these programs. For beginner, these knowledge and experience are far more valuable than any technologies.


I used the word "real" corporation for a reason. India's modern rocket tech is based on French tech, not American.

Firstly, American doesn’t agree with you again. They believe that India’s SLV-3 was quite identical to their “scout” rocket of which the design was provided to India in last 60s.

Secondly, France already allowed India to begin building Cnetaur sounding rockets under license since late 1960s. Further in 1970s, France transferred its “Viking” liquid rocket engines technology to India. These techs won’t raise someone’s eyebrow in 1980s, but they were definitely big things to a beginner in 1960s and 1970s.



Bill Clinton was highly generous in signing wavers that allowed critical space related tech to be transferred to China between 1996-1999, despite the reservations of the intel and security agencies.


The cap on tech transfer was lifted after the first of the Long March rockets exploded in 1996.


http://www.whiteoutpress.com/timeless/how-china-conquered-america746/


And I don't have to bring and search lot lot things. Most of Chinese aerospace and even automotive industry is based of Soviet ones. Later on American. There would surely be transfers of some other techs, we will never come to know about probably.

Even though Chinese scientists have different opinion about these discussions, I won’t spend time on it since we are all armature and outsiders here. But I would like to point out:

1. All the related “Western help” in your article happened in last 1990s, not the 60s or 70s which are the period our discussion is about;

2. Before Mr Clinton lift the bar in 1990s, Chinese already have the missile with the range beyond 10k km and CEP within 1km. And also over 20 Chinese satellites were launched successfully before Americans came. So how helpful information Chinese can get from Americans is quite questionable;

3. Regarding these high-end equipment listed in your article, i.e. supercomputers, the simple fact is: the similar or even better products or technologies are allowed to sell to other countries (including India), they are really not something “Other countries can only imagine in dream”.


It being intercepted byde CIWS and shorter range. Advantage it gives is of better stealth.

No, comparing to ballistic missile, cruise missile (especially sub-sonic) is generally providing longer range, flexible usage and cheap cost.


Separation needs an altitude of at least 500kms.

Not sure where you get that idea, but different missile has its own set up, the bussing can starts shortly after the boosting stage at altitude 200km and the end bussing altitude could be as low as 110km. So, there is no such 500km minimum requirement.


It does, there is a zone beyond which and below which interceptions are difficult.

You forget one thing, they will come back to low altitude, especially when they are getting close to the target where more likely the defence system stationed.
 

Indx TechStyle

Kitty mod
New Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2015
Messages
18,416
Likes
56,946
Country flag
That is very funny, diplomatically hostile? Wow, that was not what Chinese received in 1960s-1970s or NOK has been facing from 1990s. India only confronted 7th fleet for couple of months, both China and NOK had to deal with US fleet for decades. In some cases, their fighter jets started shooting each other. In one word: comparing to the pressure that Chinese and Korean resisted, the hostility on India was nothing.
India was a non-aligned country leaned towards USSR after US support to Pakistan.
Events in past & even now are more than enough to refute the baseless propaganda of US generosity to India.
Hostility with west isn't something to boast of either.
By firing these rockets, Indian scientists were able to work with the best scientists from the most advanced space exploring countries: gain the first-hand experience of how they process/organize the experiment. In the meantime, India can also buy the key checking, maintenance, surveillance equipment from these countries continuously. Otherwise, it will take India 5-10 years to build her own. And we don’t even need to mention those trainings that Indian scientists received under these programs. For beginner, these knowledge and experience are far more valuable than any technologies.
There is no logic, US cooperation was going on with a number of countries. Or let me link every single Sino US friendly engagement to claim that US helped PRC on every front.

India's first orbital launch was assisted by USSR and modern rocket tech was obtained from France.
Firstly, American doesn’t agree with you again. They believe that India’s SLV-3 was quite identical to their “scout” rocket of which the design was provided to India in last 60s.
I don't get what "Americans don't agree".

I hope you understand the difference between counterpart & derivative. SSLV would also be a copy of Minotaur then.
Secondly, France already allowed India to begin building Cnetaur sounding rockets under license since late 1960s. Further in 1970s, France transferred its “Viking” liquid rocket engines technology to India. These techs won’t raise someone’s eyebrow in 1980s, but they were definitely big things to a beginner in 1960s and 1970s.
Hey, I've told about France & USSR. Disagreeing about exaggerated role of US.
Even though Chinese scientists have different opinion about these discussions, I won’t spend time on it since we are all armature and outsiders here. But I would like to point out:

1. All the related “Western help” in your article happened in last 1990s, not the 60s or 70s which are the period our discussion is about;

2. Before Mr Clinton lift the bar in 1990s, Chinese already have the missile with the range beyond 10k km and CEP within 1km. And also over 20 Chinese satellites were launched successfully before Americans came. So how helpful information Chinese can get from Americans is quite questionable;

3. Regarding these high-end equipment listed in your article, i.e. supercomputers, the simple fact is: the similar or even better products or technologies are allowed to sell to other countries (including India), they are really not something “Other countries can only imagine in dream”.
Better you too specify which tech India got from US what "Chinese could dream of"! Article stated US role in improvising Chinese launch & nuclear tech.

Both countries had initial foreign assistances to gain initial headstarts and later started working themselves. Fact is US was far more closer to China than India while India used to look at others.

"Techs what Chinese could only dream of"
Linking every Indian improvision to west, downplaying every foreign assistance to China and claiming China did it all itself even without any knowledge or experience base with these things earlier is laughable. All Chinese systems were based on foreign platforms.
 

no smoking

New Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2009
Messages
5,057
Likes
2,353
Country flag
Linking every Indian improvision to west, downplaying every foreign assistance to China and claiming China did it all itself even without any knowledge or experience base with these things earlier is laughable. All Chinese systems were based on foreign platforms.

Firstly, where did I claim that China did it all itself? Please don’t put your words into my mouth;

Secondly, where did I even link every Indian achievement to West? Again, don’t start a discussion before you understand what others are talking about.


Here is what you said to Mr Cutting Edge:


“China and NoKo tested when they had direct hostilities with west.

We also were facing similar situation since late 60s and 70s. Did we test at that time? Heck no.”


I simply pint out one single fact: there was NO SIMILARITY between India and China/Noko since late 60s and 70s. Comparing to Chinese and Koreans, westerners have been very “friendly” towards Indians for most of time, not as an ally, but not an enemy either.
 

bhramos

New Member
Joined
Mar 21, 2009
Messages
25,644
Likes
37,250
Country flag
Homegrown BEL system to ring death knell for rogue drones


Bengaluru: Rogue unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) could find its nemesis in homegrown Drone Guard System (DGS) being developed by Bharat Electronics Ltd (BEL).

The DGS was first unveiled during the DefExpo held in Chennai in 2018 and later during Aero India held in Bengaluru 2019.

Speaking to Onmanorama on Saturday, on the sidelines of the Annual BEL press conference here, Mahesh V, Director (Research and Development) said any intruding drones could be brought down with the help of DGS.

“Rogue drones coming towards any vital installations can be brought down with our system. It employs soft-kill to bring down the intruder drone or GPS-spoofing to get it down to a specified place," Mahesh said.

An electro-optic sensor, a communication system for interception and jamming and a radar are part of the DGS, mainly developed to protect vital installations.

“We developed the DGS with our own resources and made two versions. A demonstration was shown to the Indian Army. The user wants some more additions and we are working on the same,” Mahesh said.

DGS is a portable unit with FMCW (frequency modulated continuous wave) radar and a communication jammer capable of taking on both uplink and downlink networks. It has an electro optic sensor onboard aiding the missions.

BEL says they are now working on GPS-spoofing for DGS, so as to ‘confuse’ the intruder drone and bring it to a particular area.

The Central Research Laboratories of BEL have been given enough finds to work on areas including artificial intelligence, robotics, data science and homeland security.

“We are offering the users a best system in the form of DGS that can detect, track and neutralise any drones invading into critical assets. The system can also be mounted on a vehicle,” Mahesh added.

https://english.manoramaonline.com/news/nation/2019/06/01/bel-death-knell-rogue-drones.html

#BEL anti drone system It is a portable unit with #FMCW(frequency modulated continuous wave) radar and a communication jammer capable of taking on both uplink and downlink networks. It has an electro optic sensor onboard aiding the missions.
 

Articles

Top