6 scorpene vs 55 attack subs of USN. Yeah right!
Not to mention sub hunter planes and helis will be scouting entire Indian Ocean for scorpenes. And that too if France under heavy US pressure hasn't already pressed kill switches.
US has 74 high-tech subs that is alone enough to destroy an india size country (if we add nuclear)
add 70 destroyers and 20 some frigates and hundreds of naval helicopters and top of that US marines have their own navy add that to mix and tell me where does IN stand against this monster?
They have giant navy reserves with hundreds of ships, subs and ACs kept mothballed just for situation like this.
They will fly from Pakistan, bombers will come from Saudi/UAE bases. (Gosh, do I have to be that specific!)
Please read Second stage of attack by missiles where all our SAMs are neutralized.
Destroy Diago Garcia with what?
Cruise missiles? We don't have that range.
BMs? We don't have in numbers.
Ships? They will be sunken before it crosses Sri lanka.
Nukes? You know what USA can do to India right?
Also in our war game I haven't Included mighty forces of NATO that will join the fight in case of war. I have also not mentioned Pakistan who will jump in this golden opportunity to finish India once and for all.
This is why the only thing that can save India from this disaster is Agni-6 ICBM. Rest is just nonsense.
.
Your doubling down on your stupidity . Why do then mighty USA has already destroyed little iran?
We have 16 ssk + 2-3 nuke SSBN already in water + akula SSN. You don't even know that it's hard to find a Scorpion then finding a nuke sub. Nuke sub are the noisy one.
F22 if based in Pakistan we will blow up that base. I wrote that line specifically in previous post because I knew you would hung up on such nonsense.
US aircraft carriers are useless against India they can't come closer than 1000km without su30 raining bramhos over them of which we already have more than hundreds in arsenal . 3-4 missile per carrier it will only take 40-50 to make them useless. F35 , f 18 can't operate from such distance so your brilliant war plane has failed before it begun.
Going nuclear means total annihilation for anyone. If USA goes nuclear against India you think Russia and others will wait for their fate at hands of USA ?? It will be ww3 . Nuke attack on India will tank global economy sending west into indefinite recession. Not to mention global food supply will be destroyed.
And like I said before it will take USA over a year to bring these submarine and aircraft carriers to Indian Ocean and to gain congressional approval to go to war with a nuclear power ( don't know if there will be idiots like you to approve it ).
This is more than enough time to mate live warheads with gslv missile. Since we will lack testing probably our new missiles will fall over few hundred km of target. But 100+ of them will make usa a nuclear wasteland for sure.
And I have not talked about 100+ ships the IN operates and then 2.5 million armed soldiers waiting to welcome American overlords as they land on our costs.
Your American fanboyism is crossing limits of rationality.
You know why American were sabotaged Russian cryogenic technology transfer to India in 90s ? Because unlike you they knew that having cryogenic technology already brought usa within Indian strike range. Demonstrating that is only matter of choice. Tests are done for accuracy.
Doesn't mean our missiles won't land in USA. They just won't hit precise targets if not tested enough. But who cares when we are going nuclear eh.
You think usa can bring all its force here? Leaving South China for China to grab ? Breaking treaties with Japan / Korea ? Breaking NATO commitment in black sea ? Leaving harmuz strait in Iranian control ? Leaving red sea to Egypt?
Look at those commitments and the number of ships they demand then come back here with what is left in US kitty. Talk about war. First learn about logistics.
Sent from my C103 using Tapatalk