My friend this discussion of imported vs Indian is a fruitless discussion.
Why?
Because all weapons we use are of Western origin. Means West did it before India. This also means that West has a technological edge. So anybody receiving latest weapons from West can gain an edge over India if India does not possess similar weapons.
This puts India in a uniquely difficult position. That is India's local R&D and defence industries MUST produce weapons which match best in the world. Merely producing something is not good enough.
A combination of import, collaboration, and indigenous R&D is needed to keep the sword's edge sharp.
I think current government is doing the right thing.
The point that matters is quality * Quantity. Without quantity, quality is useless unless you have some superman type superheroes or some star killer superweapon. The difference between quality is generally minimal and the wuantity is what plays the biggest role
Hindustan Aeronautics is transitioning to locally developed products from screw driver assembly. It was not easy as all HAL wants to do is screw driver jobs. Real value addition is foreign to our PSUs. But a combination of push and morale boost has worked to improve the working of defence PSUs.
Same is the story of other PSUs. The defence industry ecosystem has improved significantly under current government if you analyze value added. Even HAL's value added is significantly more as imports are replaced.
Again, DRDO is the only one which develops. PSU is here to do manufacturing, not R&D. DRDO was sabotaged by congress and hence did not build enough weapons
Dhanush has happened due to maturing of India's engineering industry. Same for ATAGS.
BUT that is not the case in every field. In fact India is still seriously lagging in Aviation despite some success in LCA Tejas. I use "some" as still major components are imported.
Wherever India can build, MOD is giving preference to Indian companies.
However MOD should have a reasonable expectation. Too much hopium can cause reverses in the battlefield. MOD needs to see what is possible and what is to be imported.
In fact Rafale deal was done with 50% offsets, intentionally to build an Aviation ecosystem in India. While Rafale is imported, it brings many technological benefits in terms of capability of Indian industry.
India makes Su30 indigenously. It has lot of advanced technology with it even in aviation. Don't underestimate. Also, in areas where there is enough technology, importing is a crime, especially in artillery, ATGM etc
Why is Dhanush costlier when there is no ToT cost, not much development cost ?
Dhanush manufacturing needs a factory to be set up and R&D to be done. This cost is recovered by adding that cost to the number of guns made. A big WW2 type factory can make 10000 guns or more a year and if such factory is made, the cost will come to 1% of what it is now.
The last thing I ever want is lecture on strategic and Defense preparedness issues. Let that be decided by those responsible for it.
Then the forum has to be shut down as everything is someone else's job
Soldiers job is to ensure safety, security and integrity of the borders and protect national sovereignty. They need basic wherewithal for it. Period.
Then the soldiers must develop it themselves, not ask for others to contribute via tax or other means. If you want it to be collective responsibility, then don't talk like this
Boss India does not exist in an island devoid of any outside contact. India has something called "foreign relations". India has powerful countries as friends today.
What is the friendship based on? What is the real reason behind sudden new friendships?
Because weapons are tools, people are not?
Weapons don't have a question of allegiance. People do. That's why human resources are developed assiduously while tools can be imported.
Weapons also need to be repaired and replaced. So, it also has allegiance. The design and IPR is with someone else and that is the problem
In spite of telling them them that 68 ton tank is a no go on our western borders, DRDO and OFB would just not budge. Our bridges, engineering equipment is largely 45 ton class or a few 60 ton class. 68 ton tank is not workable.
Also, DRDO was told to make it 4man crew, add various accessory like mineplough despite DRDO protesting that it is impossible to make 60ton tank with such extra equipment. So, it is a matter f giving impossible specifications to sabotage
What is the guarantee steel prices will not drop or forging will not become less expensive or the labour cost will not stabilize. So what is this "economy of Scale" hungama?
Economy of scale is about manufacturing enmasse. It reduces transportation cost, fuel cost, labour cost, maintenance cost etc drastically. Due to the fact that materials and equipment keep getting deteriorated due to rusting, weather etc, doing things fast will prevent the maintenance cost
OFB should / can obtain reduction in cost of Dhanus by other measures that form part of Internal measures such as specialization of labor, more integrated technology, modern kitting and tooling, boost production volumes. lower
cost of capital ( which OFB does not have to care for) spreading internal function costs, good accounting, information technology, operational efficiencies and synergies. Mergerr
and acquisitions between OFBs can also give cost reduction, boost production and reduce costs.
There is no other way. Order 2000 guns and cost will be about 20% as much per gun as it costs for 100
If Israeli gun is fully produced here with technology transfer, it is our gun only. Had we imported this gun from Israel , concern would have been genuine since this is going to be produced here it's a desi gun.
No, there is no TOT for barrel. Moreover, India already has technology and does not need any TOT.
Who ran the Muslim rule in India? Who were the scholars of Persian in India? All mercinary DRDO type Brahmins .. were not they ?
Who ran British rule in India ? Who were the English educated Babus ? DRDO type Brahmin and educated Babus, all right !!
Muslims ruled under mullahs, not Brahmans. Brahmans were disrespected by people who converted to Buddhism and eventually surrendered & converted due to cowardice. Kshatriyas would kill Brahmans who would give good advice, calling it as insults or rebellion. These kind of sabotage led to the problem, not the wise people helping evil ones