DRDO, PSU and Private Defence Sector News

C

charlie

New Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2010
Messages
1,151
Likes
1,245
Country flag
Lonewarrior said:
As for Honeywell, it's most probably for avionics. Honeywell is considered one of the gold standard when it comes to avionics. From small Inertial Navigation System for UAVs to complete autopilot suit for planes, they've their expertise. So this is what they may be bringing on the table.

As for BAe, it's a British company meaning the laws are not as stringent as those in USA, where you must adhere to ITAR regulations even for the transfer of a .jpg file via mail.
So why not have a JV with them when it's so easy
Click to expand...
BAe that’s registered in US has to follow US rules, they can’t even export to British without US consent. so it’s technically two branches or separate companies I think or something like that, they registered few years ago to participate in US contract. The contract was such that the company should be registered in US. there is an article floating around about it.
 
Lonewarrior

Lonewarrior

New Member
Joined
Oct 8, 2019
Messages
3,572
Likes
12,154
Country flag
charlie said:
BAe that’s registered in US has to follow US rules, they can’t even export to British without US consent. so it’s technically two branches or separate companies I think or something like that, they registered few years ago to participate in US contract. The contract was such that the company should be registered in US. there is an article floating around about it.
Click to expand...
The US one is a subsidiary of the UK one, so it would only have those things that BAe is willing to "lock in" US regulations not those that they intend to export.

Almost all the R&D and hi-tech stuff are managed in UK; be in nuclear warhead or Tempest 6th gen fighter.
 
NoobWannaLearn

NoobWannaLearn

New Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2022
Messages
8,978
Likes
29,244
Country flag
Lonewarrior said:
As long as a small firm is not a threat or is willing to sign a Non-Compete Clause (NCC) there's no harm selling something to them or even better, using them as an affiliate marketing.

As for the profit sharing model, there's no industry standard that you must do this. Various firms uses what they wish.
But ya, in most cases it uses the same model you mentioned...which is kind of de facto in patent and IPR world. You pay a small amount (couple of millions) to initiate the JV/ToT/Patent and then a % royalty on each piece sold.
Click to expand...
Thank you
 
C

charlie

New Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2010
Messages
1,151
Likes
1,245
Country flag
Lonewarrior said:
The US one is a subsidiary of the UK one, so it would only have those things that BAe is willing to "lock in" US regulations not those that they intend to export.

Almost all the R&D and hi-tech stuff are managed in UK; be in nuclear warhead or Tempest 6th gen fighter.
Click to expand...
Ya right tempest R&D is done in US

understand what I wrote, do a bit of reading.

www.theguardian.com

US war system reaps $2bn for BAE

BAE Systems, Britain's biggest defence manufacturer, yesterday secured its place at the heart of the Pentagon's visionary new electronic warfare programme, with a contract from Boeing worth up to $2bn.
www.theguardian.com www.theguardian.com

www.reuters.com

BAE's British roots sprout trusted American faces in U.S. defence landscape

Around the United States, Britain's BAE Systems <BAES.L> is widely seen as just another powerful U.S. defence contractor, unlike European aerospace group EADS <EAD.PA>, which is always firmly identified by its French, German and Spanish roots.
www.reuters.com www.reuters.com
 
Aniruddha Mulay

Aniruddha Mulay

New Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2019
Messages
1,847
Likes
9,861
Lonewarrior

Lonewarrior

New Member
Joined
Oct 8, 2019
Messages
3,572
Likes
12,154
Country flag
FireStar said:
https://milhub.tech/israels-arrow-3-missile-defense-sale-to-germany-gets-us-nod/

Glad we have our own domestic programs. don't need to deal with this shit.
Click to expand...
Hehehe...it's perhaps those rare moments when a foreign country, quite well regarded from military perspective does a screw-up in a thing that's exclusively our field of expertise

It's expensive; almost $4.3 billion excluding the set-up cost. High cost per round. The efficacy of a system designed to counter Iranian I/MRBM against a Russian MIRV equipped ICBM threat. Or simply the fact of US not vetoing this deal despite their THAAD losing.

It seems like Germany is also procuring jetpacks for its soldiers
 
Aditya Ballal

Aditya Ballal

New Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2020
Messages
3,616
Likes
22,281
Country flag
Aditya Ballal

Aditya Ballal

New Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2020
Messages
3,616
Likes
22,281
Country flag
R

Rassil Krishnan

New Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2019
Messages
2,112
Likes
9,256
Country flag
Aditya Ballal said:
View attachment 218761
“LCA naval trainer prototype NP5 successfully completed maiden flight today at
HAL airport, says a DRDO release. Capt Amit Kawade (IN) piloted NP5 with Wg Cdr Siddarth Singh (Retd) in the rear. The aircraft was airborne for 57 minutes with all parameters normal.”
Click to expand...
why are we still making LCA naval trainers, do we have some plan for LCA M1A in the navy?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
S DRDO UGRAM ASSAULT RIFILE Indian Army 26
cyclops India’s Scientists Working on Strategic Technology(ISRO, DRDO, BARC, etc) - Crime/Accident/Suicide/Early-Death Watch Strategic Forces 5
W DRDO test unmanned armed boat Defence & Strategy 0
cyclops Embraer deal kickbacks: CBI arrests lawyer Gautam Khaitan Indian Air Force 3
Similar threads

Latest Replies

Articles

Top