> It takes quite a bit for us to realise emerging military doctrinesWhy india is not mandating trucks to have cabin with ability to mount add on armors? Havent we learned anything from Russo Urko war?
NO the technology is suspect. They are overselling when local UAV makers are as good or better.Damm so are they waiting for more funds?
IA's yesteryears attitude of using excess manpower to offset individual soldier protection is going to bite in coming years. Gone are the days where families had two or more sons or even offsprings. People are going to barge and protest for better protection for their loved ones who are facing brunt.> It takes quite a bit for us to realise emerging military doctrines
> Armoured cabins are expensive and we try to cut as much cost as possible
> The process from RFI to fleet wise integration is considerably longer here in India
Otherwise we're already having an armoured cabin but as of now it's just limited to truck mounted howitzers
View attachment 214944
India is shoet on submarine but thanks to demoncracy in oir country by both UPA and NDA, the deal is 1 year late. Power is more important thn country.
Just saw this coincidently> It takes quite a bit for us to realise emerging military doctrines
> Armoured cabins are expensive and we try to cut as much cost as possible
> The process from RFI to fleet wise integration is considerably longer here in India
Otherwise we're already having an armoured cabin but as of now it's just limited to truck mounted howitzers
View attachment 214944
If private companies can take care of the requirements then no need for hal to do it.NO the technology is suspect. They are overselling when local UAV makers are as good or better.
The greatest difficulty is in enabling a light UAV to land in a rolling pitching heaving deck at Sea State > 0 - and pvt companies have already done that.
So moot point in getting more.
TBH, not impossible. You can have an asset forward of the launch platform, that detects the threat. Laucher can launch from safe distance away.Arre it's a sarcasm on Cheeni missile, see
Wait a sec
Definitely not impossible, but makes absolutely no sense for an air-to-air missile. As you mentioned, in case of SAM system you can definitely have a giant radar in Delhi well protected with CIWS directing Surface-to-Air batteries as far as Arunachal Pradesh.TBH, not impossible. You can have an asset forward of the launch platform, that detects the threat. Laucher can launch from safe distance away.
Though not very practical currently, would require near saturation of airspace with radars capable of hard lock.
Could be archer NG, which should have an accelerated timeline given its just tapas components in lighter/better configuration.Wait a sec
But no where word indigenous is used
It's made in India to be specific could Screwdriver-giri
And AFAIK tapas bh2 endurance is not 30 hours
Just a thought could be wrong
very true.. have been thinking for ages why it has not been done. My extravagant dream.. Have a AWCS and another transport aircraft loaded with very very air to air missiles (300 - 400 km range)... patrolling together and launching counter attack moment they detect intrusion and green signal from base - causing attacking party to break away from their designated route.. giving our fighters enough time for interdiction - if required.Bolting a pylon or two on an AWACS and adding BVRAAM seems way more logical solution.
Could be archer NG, which should have an accelerated timeline given its just tapas components in lighter/better configuration.
There is this indian airforce game ,in third mission you have to defend your base against a three waves of enemy attacks .Muh...114 gold plated Mrfa will counter PLA.
Total No of AMCA to be produced 200 total Mk2 (likely not possible) to be produced 200 total mk1A to be produced 83.
About 600 aircrafts till 2035 meanwhile PLA we will build better shit than all that before 2028
When did we last see this chunky boy, a year ago? Has it moved ahead?Hehe Boi
View attachment 215022