You are correct, we should be more excited. The reason is, BMD is such a niche technology that it might never see the light of day. Perhaps protecting coastal cities or from Chinese anti-ship ballistic missiles, but that too a far-fetched scenario.What the f is wrong with people here...
We tested a effing BMD from a ship and there's hardly 5-6 post about it...you all seem more interested in whether 200gm explosive is good or 1.5kg
Only three such unique systems exist as of now and only five countries have developed them...
France - Italy = Aster-30
US of M = Aegis
Russia - China = S-300
There are so many questions. What VLS are we using? Which design it is? Based on existing AD-1/2 lineage or completely new? Explosive or KE?
And you all want loitering munitions
But from a technological perspective things are absolutely opposite.You are correct, we should be more excited. The reason is, BMD is such a niche technology that it might never see the light of day. Perhaps protecting coastal cities or from Chinese anti-ship ballistic missiles, but that too a far-fetched scenario.
Loiter munitions are more practical and effective. Likely to be used and be the game-changing factor.
Is this measurement accurate? This would make AD1 longer than Brahmos.
Anyone know what Israeli and Poland LMs were the competitors for this?
For Poland it was for sure WarMate and for Israel it could have been Hero series, though I'm not sureAnyone know what Israeli and Poland LMs were the competitors for this?
Hope, they start inducting canister launched LMs too in huge numbers.
@AnantS , It might seem counter intutive, but custom encryption is dangerous. As of now, the existing key based encryption where you can generate large keys making it almost impossible to crack the encrypted payloads is a very good model.its mostly piggy backing off open source software.
Open source does not mean poor quality. Quite the opposite in fact in many cases
In terms of actual dimensions it may not be accurate but if you're calculating based in this particular image then it's pretty accurate.Is this measurement accurate? This would make AD1 longer than Brahmos.
No open source doesn't mean Bad quality. But it would be considered lousy job if open source are not heavily customized to give your own flavor.its mostly piggy backing off open source software.
Open source does not mean poor quality. Quite the opposite in fact in many cases
Well this sounds well and good of there are regular s/w updates like OTA or plugged. But right now these drones are burned with firmware and delivered. I doubt there are OTA upgrades available. Even if they were available how feasible will be for grunts to update their stocks at frontline. Custom atleast can give you control over variability of encryption logic in each batch. Now as as @binayak95 alluded, drones use customized version of open source. Usually companies who have their inyernal products based on open source usually have road map to keep on upgrading to latest stable release after through vetting. So you theoratically could have best of both worlds.@AnantS , It might seem counter intutive, but custom encryption is dangerous. As of now, the existing key based encryption where you can generate large keys making it almost impossible to crack the encrypted payloads is a very good model.
Custom encryption can lead to some math wizard from a foreign country figuring out weaknesses in the custom encryption and we may end up in the enigma type of situation.
Open source models allow researchers world over to have a go at the encryption and figure out weaknesses and address them. While there could be someone who has figured out something, the rigour with which researchers try to break is largely public and weaknesses come to public notice sooner or later.
Only if we have a good ecosystem of researchers in crypto math & computers.Well this sounds well and good of there are regular s/w updates like OTA or plugged. But right now these drones are burned with firmware and delivered. I doubt there are OTA upgrades available. Even if they were available how feasible will be for grunts to update their stocks at frontline. Custom atleast can give you control over variability of encryption logic in each batch. Now as as @binayak95 alluded, drones use customized version of open source. Usually companies who have their inyernal products based on open source usually have road map to keep on upgrading to latest stable release after through vetting. So you theoratically could have best of both worlds.
Did they say that the range is 15 kms?
Folks I am back
Under developmentFolks I am back
And back with some queries
What's the status of nagastra 2 or LM1 which is actually anti tank loitering munition
Is it under development or is it under testing or something else
There is a higher chance that we will be having dedicated BMD vessels in form of NGD.
Uptill now what our radar range??There is a higher chance that we will be having dedicated BMD vessels in form of NGD.
1500 kmUptill now what our radar range??