binayak95
New Member
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2011
- Messages
- 2,526
- Likes
- 8,790
Primarily because IN was least funded - and thus had no choice but to innovate and do self R&D, while IA and IAF never lacked for funds through to the 90sThanks for clarifying. If you have knowledge on this topic, why didn't IA and IAF start their own R&D cells? Constraint from those times? Something else?
Never ending trials are definitely something, but as @binayak95 wrote out, there are gaps, where the Navy, for being the least funded as it is, has been way better at supporting indigenous efforts than the other services. Just want to understand why exactly there are these deficiencies in these branches.