DRDO, PSU and Private Defence Sector News

ezsasa

Designated Cynic
Mod
Joined
Jul 12, 2014
Messages
32,662
Likes
151,101
Country flag
similar idea, different use case scenario.

Just a thought..

There should be a vertical-launched wheeled-vehicle mounted extended-range of upto 15 km range NAG launcher with atleast 16-24 tubes for anti-personnel , anti-structure and anti-armour role.

Point area defence from incoming land attack & area sanitisation roles.

Target acquisition can be EO.
 

ezsasa

Designated Cynic
Mod
Joined
Jul 12, 2014
Messages
32,662
Likes
151,101
Country flag
Since the range is small im wondering why not a gun with programable ammo which will be cheaper
What would be the pro's of such missiles vs a gun
CIWS type systems are too bulky and sends massive amount of ammo to hit one target, and then there is line of sight restriction in a gun(even radar RF travels in a straight line) and the parabolic curve of the ammo round.

1665413728399.png


missiles on the other hand, can operate beyond line of sight. if we add loitering munitions to the mix, even more flexibility in the hands of the CO.
 

Sonic Wasp

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2022
Messages
28
Likes
72
Country flag
CIWS type systems are too bulky and sends massive amount of ammo to hit one target, and then there is line of sight restriction in a gun(even radar RF travels in a straight line) and the parabolic curve of the ammo round.

View attachment 175279

missiles on the other hand, can operate beyond line of sight. if we add loitering munitions to the mix, even more flexibility in the hands of the CO.
also multiple target at once can be engaged by one single system
 

Akula

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2019
Messages
2,895
Likes
10,850
Country flag
76 SRGM 15 in quantity.

Hmm, I can only think of following distributions:
07 for P-17A
02 for P-15B (D68, D69)
02 for P-15 (D60, D62)
02 for P-11356 Batch 1(F40, F44)

Rest 02 I am not able to think where they will go. Probably on P-16A.
Rest 2 may be for training purpose.
 

SwordOfDarkness

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2021
Messages
2,775
Likes
11,802
Country flag
CIWS type systems are too bulky and sends massive amount of ammo to hit one target, and then there is line of sight restriction in a gun(even radar RF travels in a straight line) and the parabolic curve of the ammo round.

View attachment 175279

missiles on the other hand, can operate beyond line of sight. if we add loitering munitions to the mix, even more flexibility in the hands of the CO.
even more than that, missiles can be reoriented if target does agressive maneuvers and can chase the target down. With guns you point in a direction and shoot, no adjustment possible. If opponent too fast or too nimble you just try to get lucky with volume but no guarantees.
 

flanker99

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 27, 2019
Messages
2,499
Likes
14,165
Country flag
even more than that, missiles can be reoriented if target does agressive maneuvers and can chase the target down. With guns you point in a direction and shoot, no adjustment possible. If opponent too fast or too nimble you just try to get lucky with volume but no guarantees.
A missile of just 2.5 kg will have very limited maneuverability..not that drones are super maneuverable but due to short ranges and limited times trajectory corrections will be questionable.
Id focus more on reaction time and cost of missile and maybe make them air burst capable
 

SwordOfDarkness

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2021
Messages
2,775
Likes
11,802
Country flag
A missile of just 2.5 kg will have very limited maneuverability..not that drones are super maneuverable but due to short ranges and limited times trajectory corrections will be questionable.
Id focus more on reaction time and cost of missile and maybe make them air burst capable
More maneuvarable than a bullet :p
And short range, so weight is not so surprising.
 

binayak95

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 18, 2011
Messages
2,526
Likes
8,790
Country flag
Can u tell me what these smart ammunitions are?
Nothing new. Proximity Fuzing 40mm Bofors have been a thing since WWII (really) and you are right about a single barrel not being enough. In a saturation attack that barrel will overheat and melt.

1665461674636.png


This is from WWII. Bofors L60 USN mount.
1665461722567.png


and this is the British QF 2 pounder 40mm in an EIGHT gun mount.

Remember even these were not enough. USN cruisers and destroyers would have many quad and double 40mm mounts, all around the ship, supported by Oerlikon 20mm guns in similar numbers. EVEN then kamakaze attacks got through and knocked out capital ships. CAPITAL ships, defended by many other ships, and long range DP 5inch guns.


So, yeah - one measly 40mm gun aided by modern FCR aint gonna cut it.

I dont know why know one has brough back these behemoths - with modern electronics they will be terror on the battlefield.
 

binayak95

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 18, 2011
Messages
2,526
Likes
8,790
Country flag
76 SRGM 15 in quantity.

Hmm, I can only think of following distributions:
07 for P-17A
02 for P-15B (D68, D69)
02 for P-15 (D60, D62)
02 for P-11356 Batch 1(F40, F44)

Rest 02 I am not able to think where they will go. Probably on P-16A.
One will always go to INS Dronacharya the gunnery school
 

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top