vishwaprasad
New Member
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2012
- Messages
- 474
- Likes
- 149
Pak has received 3 more Eyrie awacs from Sweeden.... Now they have complete edge over us in this field and we are still happy with just 3 phalcons and 1 netra awacs
That would require renegotiation, then why not just buy new aircraft tailor made to carry radar.I see no problem. I think all Boeing Wedgetails started life as commercial airliners and then converted by Boeing to Wedgetail configuration. In the case of the RAF Wedgetail orders, it made a deal with Boeing to let a British firm do the conversion in England under Boeing supervision.
https://www.defensenews.com/industr...ng-over-potential-26b-wedgetail-aircraft-buy/
That would require renegotiation, then why not just buy new aircraft tailor made to carry radar.
Boing is a big player in the market, maybe there is faults in there software and they paid someone to cook up this theory of lazy ass work on there jets. This just diverts attention from bad software logic and version controlling than a person leaving his tools in the jet engine.And this...
Boeing tanker jets grounded due to tools and debris left during manufacturing
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.seattletimes.com/business/boeing-aerospace/boeing-tanker-jets-grounded-due-to-tools-and-debris-left-during-manufacturing/?amp=1
No doubt Boeing has been lax lately or maybe some of its workers are showing unhappiness with its aggressive cost-cutting and labor-busting schemes. But I'm confident they will sort out these issues.
Relax, there's much more to just owning and flying jets than pure strategy and good detterent. A salvo of Ks-172 (two might be enough) to drop there awacs and I believe we have those missiles. I am pretty sure IAF has a strategy for them already. We have greenpine ground radars, so as soons as an awacs lift off from there airbase, we will get info.Pak has received 3 more Eyrie awacs from Sweeden.... Now they have complete edge over us in this field and we are still happy with just 3 phalcons and 1 netra awacs
If such things were true, US wouldn't have been operating any AWACS aircraft , and I think satellites are moving way too to be used during such scenarios.Hasn't satellite based radars such as our RISAT has made AWACS already obsolete? Or do they serve other purpose besides radar surveillance?
OMG, that can not really be the answer. The ultility of AWACS Vis a Vis Satellite must lie somewhere else rather than "Since US is doing...".If such things were true, US wouldn't have been operating any AWACS aircraft , and I think satellites are moving way too to be used during such scenarios.
RISAT uses SAR which is for ground mapping. It is useless for tracking airbourne objects.Hasn't satellite based radars such as our RISAT has made AWACS already obsolete? Or do they serve other purpose besides radar surveillance?
Also RISAT-1 is in a sun-synchronous orbit, so it will have some time when it isn't able to see Pakistan or any other necessary area. As you said AWACS also has accuracy which is necessary for Fire Control.RISAT uses SAR which is for ground mapping. It is useless for tracking airbourne objects.
As a layman I understand though both can carry radars and detect the air / maritime traffic and aircrafts, AWACS is C4I platform is much more than a radar. It carriers large paraphernalia such as computers, communications, EW Equipment and even active weapon platforms not only to detect and acquire but identify, analyse and control a response to the situation . It has human elements to perform all function on the platformIf such things were true, US wouldn't have been operating any AWACS aircraft , and I think satellites are moving way too to be used during such scenarios.
I think you mean to say EMISAT but it can do enemy Radar mapping, it can act as receiver to ground based Tx'tters. You can install a greater sensitivity receiver as opposed to high gain antenna which requires more power and can give away sat's position. Ground based radars usually form a bubble around monitored airspace and can be tracked through sat.Hasn't satellite based radars such as our RISAT has made AWACS already obsolete? Or do they serve other purpose besides radar surveillance?
Satellites like RISAT use RADAR imaging to provide specific image of an area at any given time under any condition. Now it is good for surveillance and recce purpose. But AWACS is a whole platform which performs additional task of command and control center along with surveillance.Hasn't satellite based radars such as our RISAT has made AWACS already obsolete? Or do they serve other purpose besides radar surveillance?
AWACS are also used to fed radar info to the front line fighter jet in combat formation. The attacking posture jets operate by switching off the radar and depend on info fed through AWACS as used in Copa 2004 drill with AmericansHasn't satellite based radars such as our RISAT has made AWACS already obsolete? Or do they serve other purpose besides radar surveillance?
If such things were true, US wouldn't have been operating any AWACS aircraft , and I think satellites are moving way too to be used during such scenarios.