- Joined
- Jan 14, 2020
- Messages
- 9,609
- Likes
- 84,139
It's not the final design.A beatuful looking aircraft is now an ugly looking crap. Totally ugly.
It's not the final design.A beatuful looking aircraft is now an ugly looking crap. Totally ugly.
Not even changed that much!It's not the final design.
If it full fill it's parameters , then this is the new beautyA beatuful looking aircraft is now an ugly looking crap. Totally ugly.
Not even changed that much!
You mean the rear fin shapes?..Kya se kya ho gaye dekhte dekhte...
View attachment 78651
Yes, DSI and all is necessity, but the fin shapes look akwardly wrong...You mean the fin shapes?
He don't like the modified nose cone maybe , well one doubt are those jamming pods at the inner end of horizontal tailplanesYou mean the fin shapes?
The newere design is all shit, the wings look ugly, the horizontal stabilisers look ugly, the nose cone looks ugly, the DSI intake looks ugly, AMCA used to look so sleek now its front looks so bulky.He don't like the modified nose cone maybe , well one doubt are those jamming pods at the inner end of horizontal tailplanes
Welp, present one is definitely stealthier (last one abandoned edge-alignment). Possibly grants better maneuverability too.Yes, DSI and all is necessity, but the fin shapes look akwardly wrong...
Front looks thicker because it is... Quite a bit similar to MWF compared to Tejas, to get better area-ruling. See how the interraction with air is uniform until just at the control planes!The newere design is all shit, the wings look ugly, the horizontal stabilisers look ugly, the nose cone looks ugly, the DSI intake looks ugly, AMCA used to look so sleek now its front looks so bulky.
Wing tips are short, should’ve been wider don’t you think?Welp, present one is definitely stealthier (last one abandoned edge-alignment). Possibly grants better maneuverability too.
The cut at the front is so as to not scoop up too much air from below when engaged & create unwanted vortex.
View attachment 78653
With it they can maintain the edge-alignment at the back & the front edge mistach is more hidden.
Don't keep hopes of them changing it.
Front looks thicker because it is... Quite a bit similar to MWF compared to Tejas, to get better area-ruling. See how the interraction with air is uniform until just at the control planes! View attachment 78654
Nope. Dafuq will I know how it should be?!.. That's complicated shit.Wing tips are short, should’ve been wider don’t you think?
I’m saying wingtipsNope. Dafuw will I know how it should be?!.. That's complicated shit.
I know too big wings in stealth aircraft are problematic... You want small wings & big fins (ideally equal sized both). Increase in size of individual surface will exponentially increase RCS.
I’m saying wingtips
And this is real problem.
I was more disheartened when the 5 BVR internal bay & side-bays were removed, during about 2014-15.
Welp. Not that simple.And this is real problem.
Link...As per Trishul blog, Tonbo imaging may develop IRST/DAS along with BEL for MWF and AMCA.
No see, the thing is... People get to complain.From discussion thread, got to know that a fighter jet should look beautiful than other parameters like weight balance, control plains and other thing. Everyday learning new things.