abingdonboy
New Member
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2010
- Messages
- 8,084
- Likes
- 33,803
You’re wrong on this. Design work is done by an entirely different team than the quality inspectors and concept validation.My logic is, ADA is using every resource to get FOC for mK1. their all expertise and faculties are busy with that so they put Mk2 and AMCA on the back burner. secondly, ADA is already having more project in hand than it could deliver like, FOC, MK1A, MK2. moreover, ADA has to have finished all these projects in the next 10 years. third, AMCA itself is a highly technological complex programme it will need next level testing facilities, infrastructure and a highly dedicated and motivated team which ADA yet to develop
So in this highly congested schedule, ADA need a space to breathe so either they have to abandon mk2 or push AMCA timelines further
MK2 completion date, as per ADA, is 2028- 2030 so why we need MK2 while we are developing 5th generation plane in parallel? one more thing, here on this forum, we actually expecting AMCA debut flight ( 2023) earlier than Mk2 (2024-25)
FOC is now in the hands of the production agencies and HAL, there may be some ADA involvement but it won’t be from the design team.
FOC isn’t going to be taking any resources away from MK.2 let alone AMCA who all have their own design teams, in fact the Mk.2 has two- one for navy and one for airforce versions.
Hard to follow the logic that FOC would impact the design and development efforts of ADA, this simply isn’t how these things work.