- Joined
- Nov 9, 2021
- Messages
- 5,014
- Likes
- 11,734
My friend, I have never done a comparison of 39 and 51 calibre, I am saying that any gun at its maximum range will be effective only with a good sight or else it is mostly spraying bullets at those ranges without hitting anything. At those ranges, 300 meters and more, you need to have a scope like this :-Buddy u r comparing 39 and 51 calibre bullets u should know the firepower difference and with bare eyes 51 calibre bullets provide more range then 39 calibre
That's science
Sorry to say are u seriously comparing a rifle with snipers
U seriously need to read a lot
Don't take it wrongly
-:-
And if you are going to engage an enemy at close ranges (say 100 meters) than you need to have a holographic, red dot or Iron sight.
You have understood what I am trying to say there, I have never compared a rifle with a Sniper, I only said that at long ranges, Snipers are the ones which you should use to hit targets. Snipers can hit targets which are atleast 1000 meters+ with precision. You need to have a good scope as well though. So I have not compared AR and sniper. You got me wrong. And coming to my knowledge of any firearm, yes I am a noob.Sorry to say are u seriously comparing a rifle with snipers
U seriously need to read a lot
Don't take it wrongly
I confirmed it later. I don't understand why Wikipedia was saying that the maximum Firing Range is 800 Meters. (Lol)breh lol.
800 m is the max range on the sight leaf. Not the max practical range.
Practical range is 300-400 without optics, and 400-500 with good optics.
As an example, for Kar 98 K, the markings on the sight leaf extend to 2000 m. Which rifleman, do you think, is making 2000 m shots using iron sights?