That's the classic mulk nazuk daur se guzar raha hai argument. I don't buy it. Once we own a 5th gen engine by 2030, we can do advent by 2040.
Exact thing I would suggest just to add another important point which hasn’t been discussed is we need to absorb tech of an engine that we have mass produced before jumping onto a state of the art tech, can’t straight away go from no reliable engine produced to such a tech marvel! It’s like asking for trouble something will definitely go wrong...need the same approach as mk2 is a stepping stone for AMCA!!
But most importantly first we need all the sort of test beds in our country...
And we here don't taking in account that kaveri has inherent Design issues ,not mettalurgy now , earluer it was , now it's more like almost solved .
We also forget that kaveri is a engine for lower thrust not in class of ej 200
I agree with inherent design flaws but,
if it just inherent design issues why was there a talk about putting m88 core in it??
we still have metallurgy issues just compare it’s core temp to m88(75kn thrust)!!
Ej200 produces less thrust than f414 but no1 can deny it is a way much more refined engine, better in every aspect be it t/w ratio, size or fuel consumption!!
Truth might hurt but kaveri is a dead end!!
k6 is what we can make the most of that design...
So like F404 evolved to F414 to EPE, where is the progression for Kaveri?
well that’s what their plan was a series of k5 to k11or12, would have been better if they would have started with jaguar engines for which they were floating tenders all around the globe!
after it’s commercial success could have invested further in that k series
only hope now is jv or private sector!
Wait,am i missing something
Amca mk2 would be 6th or 5.5 gen ?
110kn would be underpowered AFAIK if 6th gen
On that front I hope the engine we get in jv with RR is a step up from ej200 & a stepping stone for their tempest engines, with a goal in mind to get it ready till 2028-29!
&
About 110kn+ hoping it to be revised to 120-140kn!(very much achievable with RR)