TrueSpirit
New Member
- Joined
- Jun 17, 2009
- Messages
- 1,893
- Likes
- 841
Re: What military equipment would YOU like to see in the Indian Armed
Anyway, 10:1 & even 20:1 is not an unusual combat ratio (offensive force : defenders) at those altitudes for dislodging the occupiers.
There is popular notion among military circles: In high-altitude warfare, the one occupying the higher post (i.e. the defender) holds all the advantage.
All that the defender needs is 1 HMG/MMG (with enough ammunition, of course), a suitable bunker & a trained dog to keep the offensive at bay for weeks.
I saw the mortal remains of few young officers & most of them had shrapnel injuries from grenades' & mortars.
AFAIK, it was a combination of multiple factors: lack of precision-standoff weapons, limited surveillance capabilities on those heights, enemy positions being constantly replenished by intact supply lines/reinforcements, limited acclimatization for some units combined with head-on frontal assaults, lack of relevant force-multipliers, not having quality Weapon-locating-Radars, poor intelligence regarding enemy strength, staying power & firepower.....& so on. Kunal Sir can elaborate on that..Dada, why do you think we had so many causalities in Kargil? We didn't have enough long range weapons to take out enemy positions from standoff distance?
Anyway, 10:1 & even 20:1 is not an unusual combat ratio (offensive force : defenders) at those altitudes for dislodging the occupiers.
There is popular notion among military circles: In high-altitude warfare, the one occupying the higher post (i.e. the defender) holds all the advantage.
All that the defender needs is 1 HMG/MMG (with enough ammunition, of course), a suitable bunker & a trained dog to keep the offensive at bay for weeks.
I saw the mortal remains of few young officers & most of them had shrapnel injuries from grenades' & mortars.