- Joined
- Jan 19, 2011
- Messages
- 3,947
- Likes
- 7,779
While I agree that IAF used Balakot Mirages as case builders for showcasing the poor inventory diversity, IAF never propped a Rafale against an MKI.It IAF who never encountered MKi criticism post-Balakot, In fact, they built their case on it to import Rafale and 114 Gripen ( Rafale aspect could be justified)
In fact no professional Air force in the world would make such a comparison. MKIs are air superiority fighters, which means they can do almost anything you want them to do. In a theatre of war though, their main function is crossing enemy lines and clearing SAM sites for the Bomber like Rafale and Mirage, which are more suited for ground attack roles.
MKIs are huge aircrafts, Rafales are just the right size, A MKI can deliver a Brahmos. A MKI can airdrop a 100kt Nuke. Rafales simply do not have the engine power to either of that. So a comparison between the two would be pointless and borderline mischievous.
Disclaimer: I SU-30 MKI