- Joined
- May 5, 2011
- Messages
- 12,846
- Likes
- 8,558
1 - You are appear to have no brain (proven by anyone who has seen photos of T-50-6-2+ airframes in close).
2 - They don't need radar reflectors - Russians don't tempted to hide differences between advertised and real RCS (cause they don't have them).
3 - If Russians don't show you photos of MWBs open (except for prototype ones on Berkut) it doesn't mean that no weapons were fired from them. It means that there are some unique (and thus secret) features that allows T-50 to have heavy weapons all-altitude supersonic delivery and some special systems (weapons based on new physical principals announced by Sergey Shoigu a year ago) connection and attach interfaces that should not be seen by anyone but the authorized personnel.
Don't you trust KTRV CEO Boris Obnosov when he says that 10 new weapons types from 14 announced are already integrated, tested and certified (this means their delivery from MWBs and FSBs)?
1. That light colored RAM coating looks inferior even compared to Chinese J-20 RAM coating. That's the sort of inexpensive RAM coating that is used on wide surfaces like warships.
2. PAKFA does not need radar reflectors because it will not make any difference, PAKFA radar signature is only slightly better than Su-35;
3. The Russian military is the biggest show-off in the planet. Every milestone is used as a propaganda specially in its conventional weapons. So without videos of PAKFA testing missile launchings from its internal weapons bays only means that PAKFA is still a long way from being a mature platform. The only weapon it is known to have launched from its internal weapons bay doors is a "dumb bomb."
In particular, the lack of photos of PAKFA launching missiles from its internal weapons bays means that:
a. The launching rails and weapons bay doors are not yet ready for missile launching; and,
b. The software that integrates PAKFA's sensors and its weapons are not yet mature or fully installed.
That decision to send "PROTOTYPE" PAKFA's to Syria is therefore nothing more than a desperate ploy to present an image that all is going well with PAKFA since even China is doing better in its J-20 program which ironically it bought from Russia's Mig 1.44 program. I would go further to speculate that this decision is aimed at convincing India to stay on "FINANCING" this seriously flawed Russian weapons program.
Here's an old 2013 photo of J-20 showing its internal weapons bay:
Last edited: