Dude, it's all just a large maze leading nowhere.
-> Changes to 7.62 nato for better range and hitting power compared to other ammos like 5.56.
-> Also orders a large amount of ak103 which has bad ballistics compared to 5.56.
-> People saying that soldiers trust ak more and normal engagment is 250m and just fine for that.
-> then nibbar asks why order 7.62 nato.
-> People saying that it's good for mountains and good for longer ranges.
-> nibbar confused and asks people that they said avg engaent range is 250m? Nibbar is totally confused now why sig if for avg range ak 103 is good according to people.
-> nibbar again asks people that why not order more 7.62nato sigs as they are almost the same price as that of ak 103 and future proof for coming times against body armours too. Also border areas are either mountains or deserts making sigs the best choice.
->People saying that it's an ak and it's all that matters. Not having collapsible buttstock is not a problem at all at this price point. According to them Russians are totally NOT milking us at all. People also saying that Ak is ideal for CI/CT ops.
-> Nibbar baafled asks why 7 lakh Aks, around 1.5 lakh Aks will do the job for CI/CT.
-> People saying Ak is Ak and thats the only truth in guns world.
-> Nibbar has been bamboozled. Even after learning everything about reasoning he can't make out where is head or tails of this argument.
View attachment 128194