I don’t think quality issue over here as Japan is known for only one thing, Quality. But still breaking of charging handle means it requires a better polymer or alloy in use. Random mag release might be a small design issue more, can be sorted out, atleast they are making their own, we aren’t.
Well Type-89 they made did suffer from various issues but it was accepted in service because being "Swadeshi", also being 'cheapest' solution among local options...and yet it was damn expensive compared to other rifles in market back then, about 3000 some US$ back in 90s, still is around same (inflation adjusted etc) despite large scale adoption has reduced its price...
but even after that Type-89 suffered from its issues,
some of the issues i am copy-pasting from my TG friend,
>>[19.05.20 17:04]
The current std rifle the Type 89, is based on the AR 18 and is not known for its reliability or durability. The troops hated it from the beginning. Very prone to cracking of the heat shields and the stock is flimsy
This is what he replied when i asked him what are some issues of Type 89, he replied this
>> [05.06.20 21:24]
Stocks break all the time
[05.06.20 21:25]
Upper and lower receivers come apart during firing
[05.06.20 21:25]
Mags just drop
[05.06.20 21:26]
When japs got sent to Afghanistan the guys begged M16s from muricans
[05.06.20 21:26]
Howa are a spindle machine manufacturer
[05.06.20 21:27]
Gun making is a secondary function
So...yeah...
also from an other account, Japanese still have a stockpile of 5.56 NATO ammo having previous generation NitroCellulose based propellants, that leaves lots of carbon fouling inside gas system and also is corrosive,
so after firing some rounds a soldier is compelled to clean its barrel and gas systems or it gets corrosion.
At end i'd like to remind some things,
- Type 89 was based on AR-18 design that Howa had license to manufacture, AR-18 on its own was meant to be a cheaper,"low-tech" to manufacture alternative of AR-15 due to its majority of stamped sheet receiver construction and so, conversely it affected some reliability aspects on it due to loose fittings of parts in some places, and i wonder if it got
inherited with Type 89 too despite it is of a much better quality than its
purvaj,
- Some of the issues mentioned above, like Magazine dropping out, were also seen in M16 when it got adopted, 'specifically in vietnam many troops who did 'jungle style' of taping two opposite-faced magazines together for quicker reloads found out weaker magazine locking mechanism couldn't properly held such 'heavier' magazine in place and they kept falling out, and it took at least two revisions of springs for magazine locking tab to fix it ;
so yeah...