militarysta
New Member
- Joined
- Aug 20, 2011
- Messages
- 2,110
- Likes
- 789
okHere where INSAS improved 1B1 specs ..
Compare to the NATO standard in Beryl and 457 mm barrel. So the difrence is 1,5% In fact both of then have the same long barrels.1. The barrel is 464mm and with a twist ration of 1:7.8 inches for medium and long range, Compare to shorter and more rifled Beryl ..
And the reson was (in)famous INSAS problems with reliability. Beryl have the same layout as AKM and in fact it's reliability is like in AKM -so without any problems or needed gas regulator.2. It has gas regulator as standard for operation under different circumstances, Beryl does not has it ..
And If you where carrying or shhothig whit AKM you will know about what im talking. Beryl as AKM is for monkey in term of the reliability.
Don;t be funny here. For long way carring you have sling + bag holders, solition for FM FAL is suecide in combat. Only 3 or 4 points mounted sling - and You axatly know about what im talkng. And Beryl is used whit 4 or 4 poits sling in combat. After combat - just in normal sling or whit bag holders.3. Quite necessary in Military, In long runs carrying handle is essential, Beryl does not has it ..
Soultion form FN FAL is in fat outdated, but it can be usefull if soilder have outdated equipmeend whot no 3 or 4 points sling or proper indyvidual equipment.
IMHO it's depend on army philosophy of using soilders
3650 g Beryl empty4. 3.8kgs with fully loaded magazine, Beryl stands at 4.2 kgs ..
554 g one full mag
whole is 4204g.
the difrence is 15%
Beryl SS109 V0= 920 m/s so 3018fps If Im counting right?5. IA use OFB 64gr 5.56mm with a velocity of 2900fps, Out class SS109 that Beryl use ..