India has a policy, it just cannot be spelled out in advance. We were hit in 65 war. We started preparation in 1965 and finished the task in 71. In between these 5 years, there must have been so many terror attacks. If, after every attack everyone said, today looks like a good day to invade, we'd never have succeeded. Foreign policy is more than just wars. Indian policy sailed us through the cold war without a scratch (compare that to what happened to Vietnam, Cuba etc). Not only did we keep ourselves safe, we even managed to snatch Bangladesh at the height of the cold war. That's superior strategy. We were able to go nuclear without getting invaded like Libya. We were able to buy oil in Indian currency without getting invaded like Iraq. The littoral nations of S.E Asia which were in Pakistan's camp in 65 are India's pets today (Iran had offered fighter jets/free oil and Indonesia had offered to attack Andaman). All of this is a result of foreign policy. We had the bomb in 74 but we waited until 99 till the other geopolitical factors became favorable for us. We work on our planned timeline; Not based on needling from enemies.
If it's just about visible retribution for this attack, that is coming. If you notice the government's opinion making machinery in action, you will see markers of what they want to do. If they wanted to cover it up, they could have sent a simple message to the media not to reveal the number of deaths. Here, the govt.'s opinion machinery is actively calling for attacks. The govt. wouldn't have allowed them to do that if they were going to disappoint. They are raising the temperature before the final hammer. If they show orphans and wailing widows, the govt. is building public opinion to give themselves some bandwidth in case the escalation spirals out, so that tomorrow peaceniks can't blame the govt. for dragging the nation into an "unnecessary war". They are working on the "necessary" part first.
@Willy3 gon regret his bet.
@Bhumihar ne screenshot bhi le liya.
Highly doubt that the government could just tell the media not to reveal the death toll.
This is a terror attack on 'police force' inside the country - not military casaulties in an enemy warfield.
Also, with the onset of 24/7 cable news, Internet & social media the days of controlling the media are gone...which was possible to some extent with limited print media before the 90s...
Your narrative that India always had a long term strategic plan and it gets revealed at the best time is not accurate at all. Conversely, India's bold actions were mostly driven by out-of-control and imminently devastating situations.
71 war was the only one that I would commend for good planning and execution - but of course that too was facilitated by months of massacring of millions of Bengalis.
India's lacunae in policy making is so glaringly obvious in its history!
- Failure to overcome Pakistan's prostitution to US in the 50s (which alienated US from India, despite India's desire for close relations)
- Failure to anticipate China's aggression
- Failure to anticipate 65 war (which despite the purported win did cause huge losses to India)
- Failure to anticipate and prevent Paki influence on Punjab in late 70s & the 80s
- WORST OF ALL: Failure to anticipate that Pakis would push the tens of thousands of jihadis into Kashmir in the 80s & 90s DESPITE the obvious knowledge that Paki army was in control of hundreds of thousands of mujahideen; and DESPITE THE HISTORY of Pakis having abetted terrorism in Punjab, used Pashtun tribals to attack Kashmir, & openly invaded Kashmir THREE times !
- And need I say anything about Kargill??
- Despite the several wars fought with Pakis, and enduring Paki sponsored terrorism in Punjab & Kashmir, Indian military in the 2000s had no plan for military mobilization in the eventuality of war breaking out! India took several months and lost 800+ soldiers just to mobilize the troops after the parliament attack.
India falls into Paki trap everytime! Paki's peace overtures are always meant for healing its own wounds and let India drop its guard. Yet, India falls for it every time - because it doesn't have a well thought out and a-priori strategy to deal with the various eventualities!
The boldest strategy ever formulated and implemented was that by Narashimha Rao (unfortunately he gets absolutely no credit for that)! Having seen India flounder at every step, he came in with a force and changed things at every level!
- Said a fuck you to socialism - started economic liberalization (that led to the stupendous growth)
- Established diplomatic relations with Israel (which has been a boon for Indian security)
- Finalized the nuclear testing (handed over the baton at the last leg to Vajpayee & convinced him to do it as top priority)
- First PM to openly state that the only dispute/unfinished-agenda of Kashmir is for India to reclaim POK (only since then did the Indian establishment get the balls to hark on claiming the whole of J&K as integral to India)
Net-net, I disagree with your assessment that every happenstance in Indian history was due to a very well thought out plan! Had India planned things in a strategic fashion India could have achieved growth and prosperity long back & might have been much more developed at this time.