LOC, LAC & IB warfare

Status
Not open for further replies.

Indian Sniper.001

New Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2016
Messages
1,454
Likes
6,737
Country flag
Arey dumbfuck,
If Sikkim would have been conquered by force, they would have protesting now. They came to India on their own will. And Bhutan considers India her elder brother and there is mutual love between both the countries - similar to how two terrorist states - Pak and China have mutual love for each other.
Stop this tamasha and get back into your cave. We are a peaceful Nation, but when it comes to Sovereignty and Dharma, we will stand up and fight back.
 

Krusty

New Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2015
Messages
2,529
Likes
4,873
Country flag
Map Sikkim Bhutan Chumb: Schone la peak south of Chumbi Valley in Tibet (China). Bhutan is negotiating Chaumb Valley to China. The pregnable Siluri corridor the thin land between Nepal, Bangladesh, and slightly south of Bhutan and Chinese Tibet. The Siliguri corridor is 500 km north of Chumbi valley

However 34 years ago when Bharati armies rode into Gangtok the capital of Sikkim, world conscience was asleep and has been asleep since then. While there are huge demonstrations for Tibet in the Western world, no celebrity has chosen to fight for the rights of a peaceful nation taken over by Bharat.

The world has forgotten about Sikkim and condoned Delhis act of naked aggression perpetuated on an innocent and docile population. The world has also not spoken up against the cruelty of Delhi on South Tibet (an area which it occupied from China).

Bhutan faces a similar fate. Bharat’s expansionist dreams have no end.

Bharati aggression against her neighbors has to opposed and reversed. Sanctions must be imposed on Delhi for taking over countries. Delhi must learn that aggression does not pay.

India ensalves 450 million Dalits and schedules caste people as Untouchables. Severe economic sancitons must be imposed on India ’till she liberates those millions who are in bondage.

Sikkim has lost its independence, its national identity, and Buddhism exterminated from the rest of Bharat now faces the bayonets of Brhamanism. One of our regular contributors sent us the link to this fantastic article publishedin the Nepali Times.

King Palden Thondup Namgyal, the Chogyal of Sikkim was in his palace on the morning of 6 April, 1975 when the roar of army trucks climbing the steep streets of Gangtok brought him running to the window. There were Indian soldiers everywhere, they had surrounded the palace, and short rapid bursts of machine gun fire could be heard. Basanta Kumar Chhetri, a 19-year-old guard at the palace’s main gate, was struck by a bullet and killed-the first casualty of the takeover. The 5,000-strong Indian force didn’t take more than 30 minutes to subdue the palace guards who numbered only 243. By 12.45 it was all over, Sikkim ceased to exist as an independent kingdom.


Map of Sikkim: China has wavered on accepting Sikkim as part of Bharat

Captured palace guards, hands raised high were packed into trucks and taken away, singing: “Dela sil, li gi, gang changka chibso” (may my country keep blooming like a flower). But by the, the Indian tri-colour had replaced the Sikkimese flag at the palace where the 12th king of the Namgyal dynasty was held prisoner. “The Chogyal was a great believer in India. He had huge respect for Mahatma Gnadhi and Jawaharlal Nehru. Not in his wildest dreams did he think India would ever swallow up his kingdom,” recalls Captain Sonam Yongda, the Chogyal’s aide-de-camp. Nehru himself had told journalist Kuldip Nayarin 1960: “Taking a small country like Sikkim by force would be like shooting a fly with a rifle.” Ironically it was Nehru’s daughter Indira Gandhi who cited “national interest” to make Sikkim the 22nd state in the Indian union.

In the years leading up to the 1975 annexation, there was enough evidence that all was not well in relations between New Delhi and Gangtok. The seeds were sown as far back as 1947 after India gained independence, when the Sikkim State Congress started an anti-monarchist movement to introduce democracy, end feudalism andmerge with India. “We went to Delhi to talk to Nehru about these demands,” recalls CD Rai, a rebel leader. “He told us, we’ll help you with democracy and getting rid of feudalism, but don’t talk about merger now.” Relenting to pressure from pro-democracy supporters, the 11th Chogyalwas forced to include Raiin a five-member council of ministers, to sign a one-sided treaty with India which would effectively turn Sikkim into an Indian “protectorate”, and allow the stationing of an Indian “political officer” in Gangtok.


Map of the independent kingdom of Sikkim--now occupied by Bharat

As a leader of international stature with an anti-imperialist role on the world stage, Nehru did not want to be seen to be bullying small neighbours in his own backyard. But by 1964 Nehru had died and so had the 11th Chogyal, Sir Tashi Namgyal. There was a new breed of young and impatient political people emerging in Sikkim and things were in ferment. The plot thickened when Kaji Lendup Dorji (also known as LD Kaji) of the Sikkim National Congress, who had an ancestral feud with the Chogyal’s family, entered the fray. By 1973, New Delhi was openly supporting the Kaji’s Sikkim National Congress. Pushed into a corner, the new Chogyal signed a tripatriteagreement with political parties and India under which there was further erosion of his powers. LD Kaji’s Sikkim National Congress won an overwhelming majority in the 1974 elections, and within a year the cabinet passed a bill asking for the Chogyal’sremoval. The house sought a referendum, during which the decision was endorsed. “That was a charade,” says KC Pradhan, who was then minister of agriculture. “The voting was directed by the

Indian military.”

India’s “Chief Executive” in Gangtok wrote: “Sikkim’s merger was necessary for Indian national interest. And we worked to that end. Maybe if the Chogyal had been smarter, and played his cards better, it wouldn’t have turned out the way it did.”

It is also said that the real battle was not between the Chogyal and Kaji Lendup Dorji, but between their wives. On one side was Queen Hope Cook, the American wife of the Chogyal and on the other was the Belgian wife of the Kaji, Elisa-Maria Standford. “This was a proxy war between the American and the Belgian,” says former chief minister, BB Gurung. But there was a third woman involved: Indira Gandhi in New Delhi.

Chogyal Palden met the 24-year-old New Yorker, Hope Cook, in Darjeeling in 1963 and married her. For Cook, this was a dream come true: to become the queen of an independent kingdom in Shangrila. She started taking the message of Sikkimese independence to the youth, and the allegations started flying thick and fast that she was a CIA agent. These were the coldest years of the Cold War, and there was a tendency in India to see a “foreign hand” behindeverything so it was not unusual for the American queen to be labelled a CIA agent. However, as Hope Cook’s relations withDelhi deteriorated, so did her marriage with the Chogyal. In 1973, she took her two children and went back to New York. She hasn’t returned to Sikkim since.

Then there was Elisa-Maria, daughter of a Belgian father and German mother who left her Scottish husband in Burma and married LD Kaji in Delhi in 1957. The two couldn’t have been more different. Elisa-Maria wanted to be Sikkim’s First Lady, but Hope Cook stood in the way. “She didn’t just want to be the wife of an Indian chief minister, she wanted to be the wife of the prime minister of an independent Sikkim.” With that kind of an ambition, it was not surprising that with annexation, neither Hope Cook nor Elisa-Maria got what they wanted.

Meanwhile in New Delhi, Indira Gandhi was going from strengthto strength, and India was flexing its muscles. The 1971 Bangladesh war and the atomic test in 1974 gave Delhi the confidence to take care of Sikkim once and for all. Indira Gandhi was concerned that Sikkim may show independent tendencies and become a UN member like Bhutan did in 1971, and she also didn’t take kindly to the three Himalayan kingdoms, Bhutan, Sikkim andNepal, getting too cosy with each other. The Chogyal attended King Birendra’s coronation in Kathmandu in 1975 andhobnobbed with the Pakistanis and the Chinese, and there was a lobby in Delhi that felt Sikkim may get Chinese help to become independent.

In his book on the Indian intelligence agency, Inside RAW, The story of India’s secret service, Ashok Raina writes that New Delhi had taken the decision to annex Sikkim in 1971, andthat the RAW used the next two years to create the right conditions within Sikkim to make that happen. The key here was to use the predominantly-Hindu Sikkimese of Nepali origin who complained of discrimination from the Buddhist king and elite to rise up. “What we felt then was that the Chogyal was unjust to us,” says CD Rai, editor of Gangtok Times and ex-minister. “We thought it may be better to be Indian than to be oppressed by the king.”

So, when the Indian troops moved in there was general jubilation on the streets of Gangtok. It was in fact in faraway Kathmandu that there were reverberations. Beijing expressed grave concern. But in the absence of popular protests against the Indian move, there was only muted reaction at the United Nations in New York. It was only later that there were contrary opinions within India-Morarji Desai said in 1978 that the merger was a mistake. Even Sikkimese political leaders who fought for the merger said it was a blunder and worked to roll it back. But by then it was too late.

Today, most Sikkimese know they lost their independence in 1975, and Siliguri-bound passengers in Gangtok still say they are “going to India”. The elite have benefited from New Delhi’s largesse and aren’t complaining. As ex-chief minister BB Gurung says: “We can’t turn the clock back now.” 25 years after SIKKIM

Next month, it will be 25 years since the Indian annexation of Sikkim. Sudheer Sharmalooks back at how a Himalayan kingdom lost its sovereignty. Nepali Times
Wow. I must have touched a nerve there. You got triggered!

Now apply the same thing you said as India doing to Sikkim (Sikkimese are strongly loyal to India) to what China did to Tibet when the world conscience was asleep.

BTW if you read history you will find that Tibet and tibetian Buddhism has its DNA linked more with India than Han China. It is a part of Dharmic land having nothing to do with hans.

I don't drink kommie kool-aid thank you. You can keep it for your consumption.

Now if you have some free time Instead of writing pages of gibberish go and read what happened in '67 and '87. Not commie material. That will say Chinese used the death star to wipe out entire north east and taught India a lesson and went back in time for their wonton noodle supper. Read from some reputed source.. and reflect on reality
 
Last edited:

Krusty

New Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2015
Messages
2,529
Likes
4,873
Country flag
Today, most Sikkimese know they lost their independence in 1975, and Siliguri-bound passengers in Gangtok still say they are

Sikkim is/was more "Chinese" than "Indian". It would have been fine if Sikkim remained independent, but this way is okay as well because now there is a direct path between Indian and China. The area in the NE is also more "Chinese" than "Indian" -
I am telling you the entire region of Tibet has nothing to do with Han China. It is forcefully oppressed and occupied. Don't get me started with Xinjiang. We have Sikkimese in this very forum and they will he happy to shed some truth and dispel commie lies and propaganda
 

Joker

New Member
Joined
May 30, 2017
Messages
566
Likes
1,867
Country flag
@Tigerpaw
Wonder how many generations of inbreeding lead to a mongrel like you
You Pakis a so shameless that you will try to encroach on an Indian defence forum with Singaporean flag.
No wonder you guys get burned like ground rodents when a oil tanker turtles. Inbred swine who are not even good at terrorising people. Shameless vermin
 

airtel

New Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2015
Messages
3,430
Likes
7,815
Country flag
I am telling you the entire region of Tibet has nothing to do with Han China. It is forcefully oppressed and occupied. Don't get me started with Xinjiang. We have Sikkimese in this very forum and they will he happy to shed some truth and dispel commie lies and propaganda
stop feeding this Paki troll , report his profile .
 

Tarun Kumar

New Member
Joined
Dec 12, 2016
Messages
942
Likes
1,047
I dont know why we entertain Pakis on this forum when they cannot undertake any half decent discussion. Just the other day one Paki was saying that their missile program is superior to ours because we are building ABMs. I mean they dont even realize that building an ABM is far more complex than building a missile and that India is pursuing ABM system shows how advanced we are in our missile program compared to Pak which only assembles Chinese parts of M11 and M9 and gives it fancy names. We already have deployed several missiles against pakiland and dont need more varieties of same range to create more production line headaches. I mean if agni 1 can hit all parts of pakiland, do we need a nirbhay to be armed with nukes-No.
 

square

Strategic Issues
New Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2016
Messages
1,636
Likes
1,464
No we are well educated people unlike hindus which get educated from RSS mandir academy, and then trained further by bajrang dal , shiv sena, bal thakrey, ajit doval type people to kill Muslims in the name of beef by joining cow protectors " gaw rakhshaks" mobs.

pakistani......!!!

ashamed of even using your country flag ?
 

square

Strategic Issues
New Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2016
Messages
1,636
Likes
1,464
stop feeding this Paki troll , report his profile .
there should be a machanisum to identify the location by reading the IP.....and flag should be given only on the bases of location of IP...
 

Mikesingh

New Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2015
Messages
7,353
Likes
30,450
Country flag
No we are well educated people unlike hindus which get educated from RSS mandir academy, and then trained further by bajrang dal , shiv sena, bal thakrey, ajit doval type people to kill Muslims in the name of beef by joining cow protectors " gaw rakhshaks" mobs.
Well educated? Lol! Your professors are Hafiz Saeed (designated terrorist), Sallauddin (designated terrorist), Masood Azhar (designated terrorist), Dawood Abraham (designated terrorist) etc etc....

They also run the biggest terror industries of Porkistan known the world over. And your corrupt army runs stuff like bakeries, hair cutting saloons, malls, bus and truck services, poultry farms etc etc with a turnover more than the trade between you and your masters China which is a mere $14 billion compared to Porkistan Military Inc that runs a parallel economy of a whopping $16 billion and counting!

No wonder you Porki poodle fakers lost all wars against India because the Islamic Army of Porkistan is more into running cinema halls and malls than learning to fight! Lol!
 

Rahul Singh

New Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2009
Messages
3,652
Likes
5,790
Country flag
Ok, the pressure is immense from Pakistan and they are managing success in convincing Chinese that if they don't start trouble on India's eastern front then CPEC would be lost. It is, however, another thing that Pakistanis are seeing their country slipping from their hand --right from borders to hinterland-- and already feeling helpless.

In response to Chinese threat, we need to actively support Tibetan cause...... Maybe RAW is already doing it that is why China is getting jittery.
 

mahesh

New Member
Joined
Sep 6, 2010
Messages
607
Likes
476
Country flag
This paper editor must be asked to tell his view on how the Tibet occupied people are feeling about illegal occupation of china and human right violations and according to his point of view, china should liberate more than half of the current entire country to liberate occupied regions.
and this paper is viewed right only inside the country (china and its beggar pakistan) this news does not hold weight outside china as the world know the characteristics of PLA.
The editor is Just sleeping on TIbet, SCS and Taiwan issues (to name a few) and day dreaming about sikkim and bhutan.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Articles

Top