LOC, LAC & IB skirmishs

Status
Not open for further replies.

Nicky G

Tihar Jail
Banned
Joined
Nov 24, 2014
Messages
4,250
Likes
13,816
Country flag
Exactly. Defence enthusiasts like people on this forum have a general idea what the true military capabilities of both sides are, and how this is just comedic propaganda coming from their side. But the layman reading such kind of news and has no idea how powerful our own military is and might be intimidated, and this will strengthen the leftist/ congressi peace brigade who will then make a ruckus asking for deescalation and peace.

They will say things like " China is so powerful, we should back away before they declare war" etc. The news channels should make sure that they put forward military analyses from our side showing the hollowness of Chinese threats. But they're not doing that. They're just quoting the chinks word for word and posting it. We are literally strengthening Chinese propaganda.
There is also pressure from corporate lobbies who have Chinese money invested or have other business interests.
 

captscooby81

New Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2016
Messages
7,371
Likes
27,670
Country flag
Why are you posting about ICBMs ..Are you moving them to Dolam ..Seriously you going to use Nuke :scared2:



There are pictures of four brigades of DF-41 ICBMs in China (Heilongjiang, Henan, Xinjiang, and Tibet Provinces).

I saw the video of the DF-41 ICBM in Heilongjiang. I also saw picture(s) of the DF-41 ICBM on the Tibetan Province plateau.

Each brigade of Chinese ICBMs contains 12 missiles.

4 DF-41 ICBM brigades x 12 ICBMs per brigade x 10 MIRVs per DF-41 ICBM = 480 thermonuclear warheads

China's DF-41 ICBMs alone is double the Pentagon estimate of 250 total Chinese thermonuclear warheads.
----------

Chinese DF-41 ICBM likely coming out of "Xinjiang Turpan train station."
 

Jay99

New Member
Joined
Mar 28, 2017
Messages
505
Likes
1,383
Country flag
General Rawat to Narendra Modi on Chinese rhetoric:pound::pound::pound::india:

716fd3f3f915b1ccf86111fd477799f3d2061b1a18a0ef6c1186003077c4fece.jpg
 

hit&run

United States of Hindu Empire
New Member
Joined
May 29, 2009
Messages
14,104
Likes
63,378
Not only that. The Indian Navy will block the Malacca Strait thereby shutting off billions of dollars from trade along this route. This is one of the reasons why China is so desperate to get the CPEC going as an alternative route as soon as possible.
Its easier to shut CPEC route than sea lanes.
 

Butter Chicken

New Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2016
Messages
9,742
Likes
69,904
Country flag
One soldier martyred in unprovoked ceasefire violation by Pakistan in Krishna Ghati sector of Jammu & Kashmir

 

sorcerer

New Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2013
Messages
26,919
Likes
98,474
Country flag
If Doklam is Chinese territory, why has Beijing been negotiating with Bhutan on this for a decade?


The simple reason why India is not swayed by the war rhetoric being whipped up by Chinese media and is handling the situation quietly is owing to its close diplomatic ties with Bhutan

The Doklam stand-off, now into its eighth week, has been characterised by jingoistic war rhetoric from the Chinese official English media and patient-yet-firm Indian diplomacy. Many an armchair strategist has misconstrued India’s calm demeanour to convey that Narendra Modi is in a tight spot and trying to wriggle out from a perceived position of weakness. This perception is perhaps diametrically opposite from the situation on ground at the strategic Doklam plateau as well as the mood of the deep state in New Delhi.

The Modi government’s hand has also been significantly strengthened by political support across party lines as expressed during the short-duration discussion in the Rajya Sabha on August 3. What needs to be singled out from that debate is that Ghulam Nabi Azad, the Congress’s Leader in the Rajya Sabha, ticked off party MP Rajiv Shukla who wanted India to attend the One Belt One Road Forum, by dismissing it as Shukla’s personal view. The message from the Rajya Sabha that day was that India stands united on the Doklam stand-off and will not allow the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to unilaterally change the border alignment at the India-China-Bhutan trijunction. This is in accordance with the latest 2012 agreement signed by the Special Representatives on boundary talks and firmly reiterated by Indian National Security Advisor Ajit Doval in his meeting with his Chinese counterpart State Councillor Yang Jiechi on the sidelines of the BRICS NSAs summit in Beijing last month.

The reason why India is not swayed by war rhetoric and is handling the situation quietly is due to its close diplomatic ties with Bhutan. The fact is that the Indian army and the Bhutanese army work in close operational coordination with a division-strength Indian Military Training Team (IMTRAT) sitting in Thimpu to train the troops of its closest ally. So while India has no intention of letting down its guard in the trijunction area and ending up exposing the vulnerable Silliguri corridor, the Chinese English media has been threatening military operations in two weeks time to evict Indian and Bhutanese troops from the so-called Chinese territory.

This begets a simple question: If Doklam is Chinese territory then why has Beijing been negotiating with Bhutan on the same for the past decade? While New Delhi has gone on record stating that the issue needs to be resolved diplomatically, the verbal aggression from China could have a negative impact on the bilateral trade with the Indian public mood becoming increasingly resentful of the war rhetoric. Bilateral trade worth $ 71.482 billion is heavily skewed towards China with India’s trade deficit a touch more than $ 51 billion. Since Mao Zedong’s time, Beijing has advocated parallel diplomacy to encourage the China-India bilateral relationship. In his memoirs, former Chinese foreign minister Huang Hua wrote that Mao:bs: in the 1970s wanted bilateral trade and boundary resolution with India to go on separate tracks and not impinge on each other. The war rhetoric from Beijing will complicate this parallel diplomacy. :bs:

China watchers dismiss this verbal aggression as part of Chinese information warfare as it does not match with the passive military deployment on ground in Tibet. Even though border patrols on both sides are alert, there is nothing untoward happening at Doklam with troops from both sides at a safe distance. While hawks on the Chinese side favour escalation by the PLA, intruding into eight mutually identified disputed areas along the Line of Actual Control (LAC), such a move will further isolate Beijing globally after its aggressive behaviour in the South China Sea. This does not augur well for a country that aspires to be numero uno on the global front.


http://www.hindustantimes.com/analy...or-a-decade/story-sN7VkVzoXIQKv5k3kNzsDO.html
 

sorcerer

New Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2013
Messages
26,919
Likes
98,474
Country flag
chinese FACE SAVING REHTORIC at full blast.
Seems like they are in the verge of crying to India to understand their GOVT position :D
This lady actually CRIED OUT LOUD!!! :D :D :D
No wonder DOVAL Is laughing

----
Wang was briefing an Indian media delegation, whose visit was sponsored by the state-run All China Journalists Association (ACJA), on China's stand on the Doklam standoff.

"It is impossible to have a dialogue with India at this time. Our people will think our government is incompetent."
-----
Seems like She's manhood is at stake here !!!

Meaning the chinese govt agrees that its wrong in starting a stand off and it all boils down to a prestige issue for SHE .


http://economictimes.indiatimes.com...ashmirchina-to-india/articleshow/59972866.cms
 

IndianHawk

New Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2016
Messages
9,058
Likes
37,675
Country flag
War is must for us. Without war we will never be out of 1962s shadow.
As Lord Krishna said , this war is the open gate of heaven , it is god given .

We mustn't waste this golden opportunity.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Articles

Top