Homi J Bhaba
New Member
- Joined
- Apr 29, 2021
- Messages
- 12
- Likes
- 39
MK2 will go on no matter what, The IAF is committed.The new CAS has openly declared LCA MK.2 is dead if you see the content of his pre-planned carefully crafted speeches.
MK2 will go on no matter what, The IAF is committed.The new CAS has openly declared LCA MK.2 is dead if you see the content of his pre-planned carefully crafted speeches.
No they aren’t. Their new CAS has effectively ignored its existence in every public interview/speech he’s given.MK2 will go on no matter what, The IAF is committed.
8 squadrons of Rafale/MRFA- IAF probably will have to dig for crude oil in its bases and become a OPEC member for that to happenNo they aren’t. Their new CAS has effectively ignored its existence in every public interview/speech he’s given.
you can live with your eyes closed for as long as you like but when the CAS mentioned they won’t meet their sanctioned strength in the next 15 years but are going for 114 MRFA it made it clear- LCA MK.2 project is over for them.
Only way to get to 42squadrons is with a large order of LCA MK.2, admitting they will only get to 35 squadrons under their current force plans BUT they are getting their 114 MRFA should indicate where the shortfall has been made.
6 SQNs LCA
8 MRFA/Rafale
15 SU30MKI
6 AMCA
Someone do the maths on that and tell me where the space is for the IAF’s 35 squadron force by mid 2030s
I don’t care how feasible it is. These are the words from the IAF themselves, they are the ones that have to order the LCA MK.2. If they are focused on getting their MRFA then LCA MK.2 is already dead because they clearly don’t see space for it in their future force.8 squadrons of Rafale/MRFA- IAF probably will have to dig for crude oil in its bases and become a OPEC member for that to happen
Well AMCA Should no1 priority Specially turbofan Engines technology in 8-9 yearsI don’t care how feasible it is. These are the words from the IAF themselves, they are the ones that have to order the LCA MK.2. If they are focused on getting their MRFA then LCA MK.2 is already dead because they clearly don’t see space for it in their future force.
we were hoping the MK.2 experience would be different, large order commitments upfront so that large scale production could be achieved early on. It seems even worse than the MK.1 saga now.
MK.2 is heading into LCH, LUH etc territory. It will be ready but no one will want ir.
How much cost Of 7 Squadrons MWF Will be1) At most another 54 (3 squadrons) Rafales.(most probably 36)
2) 7 squadrons of MWF (If americans dont wield the CAATSA sword)
12-13 Sukhoi + 4 Rafale + 6 Tejas + 7 MWF + 2 AMCA + 6 Jaguar + 3 Mirages + 3 Mig 29UPG = 43 squadrons by 2034. From around 2033, Jaguar, Mirages and Mig 29 will start to retire.
Show me one IAF official making any such comments.1) At most another 54 (3 squadrons) Rafales.(most probably 36)
2) 7 squadrons of MWF (If americans dont wield the CAATSA sword)
12-13 Sukhoi + 4 Rafale + 6 Tejas + 7 MWF + 2 AMCA + 6 Jaguar + 3 Mirages + 3 Mig 29UPG = 43 squadrons by 2034. From around 2033, Jaguar, Mirages and Mig 29 will start to retire.
A lot less than 6 squadrons of MRFAHow much cost Of 7 Squadrons MWF Will be
If 4 Squadrons Of MK1A pegged at 6.2 billion $ ???Any guess
Around 11-12 billion USDHow much cost Of 7 Squadrons MWF Will be
If 4 Squadrons Of MK1A pegged at 6.2 billion $ ???Any guess
Well Yes Remember We Have large fleet Of MKI Sitting to get MLUed '7-8 billion $Around 11-12 billion USD
IAF not taking that risk They are Flying bogey of 5 generation nowThe one thing everyone is ignoring is that IAF also ditched the MK1 as well, then Parikar happened and shoved MK1 down the throat , same will happen with the MK2 .
Oh c'mon not this again, with due respect sir, if you think IAF chief openly saying that 'AMCA and Tejas Mk2 are on the cards', repetitive reiterations of their commitment to the Atmanirbharta is 'declaring MWF dead' then i really don't know what you can call 'alive'.The new CAS has openly declared LCA MK.2 is dead if you see the content of his pre-planned carefully crafted speeches.
>every public interview/speechNo they aren’t. Their new CAS has effectively ignored its existence in every public interview/speech he’s given.
I haven’t said once that the new CAS hasn’t mentioned the MK.2 but he’s omitted it at least 3 times when he’s mentioned future force levels- never once failed to mention the 114 MRFA.Oh c'mon not this again, with due respect sir, if you think IAF chief openly saying that 'AMCA and Tejas Mk2 are on the cards', repetitive reiterations of their commitment to the Atmanirbharta is 'declaring MWF dead' then i really don't know what you can call 'alive'.
Thanks to @rakesh in BRF i found this, IAF chief's statement on 1st October,
I think our steps are well known to everybody. We have signed the contract for 83 LCA; the AMCA and LCA-Mk2 are on the cards: IAF Chief, Air Chief Marshal VR Chaudhari to ANI, on Indian Air Force's steps for future in the direction of 'Make in India' initiative
>every public interview/speech
Perhaps you missed his interview from 1st of October, here's the video with timestamp where he reiterates IAF's support for MWF and AMCA program,
Also, why even bother bringing up MWF autism again and again in an unrelated thread? We will see what will happen, doing rona over something that is at least 2 to 3 years away is just futile IMO. MWF already confirmed by Dr. Kota that it is ready and going through the final review phase, we can fully expect it to have rollout by the next year and first flight soon after.
MWF is the best aircraft to fulfill the demands of IAF until AMCA arrives.
I am afraid that people are reading too much into it this whole fiasco.
JF-17 Thunder might have crashed 5 times. Out of 130 Planes built only 5 have been crashed. I agree with your comments about Tejas which is more Indian when compared to Pakistan.Looks like Malaysian Defence Forum is an extension of PeeDF, literally the same level of delusion both here and there.
- JF-17, thanks to its hasty induction has crashed atleast 5 times, not a single Tejas has crashed in the last 20 years.
- Budget overrun by 25 times, LOL, so is the original program cost supposed to be $80 million.
- 53 significant shortfalls, LOL, ask them to name a single one. Also payload is 4.3 tons and has demonstrated takeoff with 3.5 tons payload from Leh airfield.
- Less than 30% Indian made, looks like Afghani weed has made its way to Malaysia.
- Someone tell that idiot its been 2 years since it got FOC
Okay then, rough calculations based on 18 aircraft per sqdn.I haven’t said once that the new CAS hasn’t mentioned the MK.2 but he’s omitted it at least 3 times when he’s mentioned future force levels- never once failed to mention the 114 MRFA.
This isn’t the crux of my point. The fact that he’s mentioned 35 squadrons by 2035 means there’s NO space for LCA MK.2. Do the calculations yourself and show me how many LCA MK.2 can be inducted if the IAF is targeting 35 squadrons by 2035
I’m not saying the MK.2 isn’t being developed and won’t make progress but it will get the same treatment as Arjun, LCH, LUH etc
We don't have money for IAF fantasy , it should be nipped in the butt..IAF not taking that risk They are Flying bogey of 5 generation now
Ultimately Its IAF Which decides sanctioned Squadron strength
Rafale 9 ton Payload makes it Better contender in their eyes
you are forgetting
"Sher Ne khoon chakh liya hai "
IAF is in love with rafale From dhanoa To every air chief Sing Sermons For rafale
Only Road block is opposition corruption bogey Which is more pragmatic blockage
MWF cost is more than buying 114 rafaleWe don't have money for IAF fantasy , it should be nipped in the butt..
IAF either should commit for MWF or no Rafale
MWF will have far lower cost of operation and it will get India on the export marketMWF cost is more than buying 114 rafale
And rafale carry 9 Ton load compared 6.5 to MWF .
Both are different category aircrafts
Twin engine vs single one
Also US engines are biggest constraints and embargo prone
Whenever We by Russian technology
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
LCA Tejas: Photos & Footages (no text other than headings) | Military Multimedia | 87 | ||
LCA TEJAS and what makes it stand out | Knowledge Repository | 8 | ||
W | Rise of LCA Tejas Multi Role Fighter Aircraft | Indian Air Force | 23 | |
C | LRUs or parts of LCA Tejas Made and designed in India | Indian Air Force | 16 |