WolfPack86
New Member
- Joined
- Oct 20, 2015
- Messages
- 10,571
- Likes
- 16,993
And here’s defence minister @NSitharaman at the Rafale line in France. That’s an airframe for the Indian Air Force.
This is not correct in case of critical sector like security and agriculture. These areas require highest reliability, even if it means lesser economic efficiency. Building capacity in private must not be at the expense of public sectors in these critical areas.And anyway, any mediocre economist will tell you disinvestment is essential to prudent financial management of an economy. Keeping HAL’s unions happy is NOT in the national interest. Building up cross spectrum capacity in the private sector IS.
COMCASA will be judiciously used by India to get select technology only and not used carelessly. Depending on how India uses COMCASA technology, the implications will changeYou're a moron to think COMSACA won't change things. At the very least there will be several assets tapped into US/NATO networks which will feed in perhaps the most interesting set of data for practical use. The real reason it was signed is for expanded real time views of our entire neighborhood as well easier availability of technology.
Why is it that HAL has a lot on it's plate? Their production efficiency is so low they have to buy fighters from Russia to stay on schedule. It turns out those fighters are cheaper than the ones they produce. I wonder where that money goes when they overcharge the MoD and pocket the difference. It sounds like something CAG should be investigating.
They arrive in knock down kits and HAL assembles them instead of forging the parts like they are supposed to. HAL has import license to order these kits but no one is enforcing their indigenous content promises nor has anyone questioned where the difference in price of what they are charging the MoD is going to.YES the CAG should be investigating it, But how does HAL bring in entire planes and no one sees what they import?
=>What experience does Mahindra have ?
Lack of knowledge on your part, because Reliance didn't even had the facilities for the Rafale offsets, Dassault needed to fund it first. While companies like Mahindra or Tata are already established in the aviation field and work with foreign OEMs for years.Propaganda! Reliance is not manufacturing any rafales
And that shows the limited understanding you have on the matter. Pride on an indigenous name tag doesn't create orders, or makes the aircraft be developed and certified faster.Do 228 remains imported aircraft manufactured under license where saras is an indigenous effort. You cannot change this fact.
Yes I did, by showing you which version is the medium class one. The proposal then and now was/is for Gripen E, but now the production version is available and because of Brazil, the fighter got more capable than the version proposed in MMRCA 1.0.You did not answer my question. My question was how did Gripen NG/C/D participate in MMRCA 1.0 ?
Since MMRCA was supposed to mediu
HAL can't order fighters, only IAF/MoD can. The order of 42 was initiated by IAF, to cover crashed fighters and the early phase out of upgraded Mig 27s and just as the 40 MKIs before that order, it was added to the production line, not ordered from Irkut.YES the CAG should be investigating it, But how does HAL bring in entire planes and no one sees what they import?
Lack of knowledge on your part, because Mahindra or Tata never had aviation field until they got offsets from C17, C130J, Apache etc. Same rules apples to reliance as well.=>
https://defenceforumindia.com/forum/threads/know-your-rafale.32861/page-751#post-1456274
Lack of knowledge on your part, because Reliance didn't even had the facilities for the Rafale offsets, Dassault needed to fund it first. While companies like Mahindra or Tata are already established in the aviation field and work with foreign OEMs for years
:bs:And that shows the limited understanding you have on the matter. Pride on an indigenous name tag doesn't create orders, or makes the aircraft be developed and certified faster.
Aim of Make in India is to make india self reliant & not import dependent on others.HAL has the Do 228 to cover the defence and civil market today and support the Make in India campaign!
Lies! Saab offered Gripen NG which was light combat aircraft just like Tejas in MMRCA 1.0 & Gripen E was never tested by india as well.Do 228 Yes I did, by showing you which version is the medium class one. The proposal then and now was/is for Gripen E, but now the production version is available and because of Brazil, the fighter got more capable than the version proposed in MMRCA 1.0.
Lol, it's called Make in India, not Make for India!Aim of Make in India is to make india self reliant & not import dependent on others.
As explained before, Gripen NG is a tech demonstrator, not a production version, but even that falls into medium weight class. So you not only understand the difference between NG and E, but also that the MTOW is the criteria for weight class. That's why Gripen C/D which was offered in the MRCA initially, was not enough anymore to participate in the MMRCA => which lead to Gripen ELies! Saab offered Gripen NG which was light combat aircraft just like Tejas in MMRCA 1.0 & Gripen E was never tested by india as well.
You are incorrect, the IAF does not micromanage what HAL imports to fill the orders. That might be a solution to the problem however. They are already talking about putting Air Marshals to head LCA production to get it on track.HAL can't order fighters, only IAF/MoD can. The order of 42 was initiated by IAF, to cover crashed fighters and the early phase out of upgraded Mig 27s and just as the 40 MKIs before that order, it was added to the production line, not ordered from Irkut.
Which is better Make in India or Made in India ?Lol, it's called Make in India, not Make for India!
The Make in India campaign is aimed at foreign production being diverted to India, to make India a manufacturing hub.
:bs:As explained before, Gripen NG is a tech demonstrator, not a production version, but even that falls into medium weight class. So you not only understand the difference between NG and E, but also that the MTOW is the criteria for weight class. That's why Gripen C/D which was offered in the MRCA initially, was not enough anymore to participate in the MMRCA => which lead to Gripen E
You forget that CFT has less drag, so a 1150 CFT offer a greater range than a classical 1200 L tank.CFTs have 1150l each and that's far too low to replace the external tanks in any other role than A2A.
Not really.F35 - internal carriage of fuel and weapons
F 35A = INTERNAL GUNNot really.
euhhh... stealth = internal canon, no?
So a F35 external canon is stealthy, but a Rafale external probe can't (Rafale haters propaganda).F 35A = INTERNAL GUN
F 35B/C = EXTERNAL STEALTH POD
F 35s are not infantry but SOF snipers. You have an F 15 or another F 35 as a bomb truck and you let the pathfinder F 35 designate targets and pass them on to weapons launched by F 15 / Bomb truck F 35. By Block 4/5 F 35 will carry 6 AIM 120D in internal bays and can go strictly for A2A.So a F35 external canon is stealthy, but a Rafale external probe can't (Rafale haters propaganda).
And what about the ASRAAM and bobs under the wings ?
And what about the bays that are to be opened every 20 minutes to refresh the plane?
Wrong, because I never questioend drag or range, my point was, that Rafales CFTs can't replace external fuel tanks in all missions, like the CFTs of F16, F18 and EF do, because of insufficient fuel capacity. That's why Rafale will always be dependent on external fuel and that's limits it's RCS reduction potential.You forget that CFT has less drag, so a 1150 CFT offer a greater range than a classical 1200 L tank.
Don't bother, he knows the facts, he just can't admit, that even a bad 5th gen fighter like F35, has a clear advantage - stealth.F 35A = INTERNAL GUN
F 35B/C = EXTERNAL STEALTH POD
They don't have to, MoD does! HAL can't order fighters bypassing MoD, or away from IAFs orders.You are incorrect, the IAF does not micromanage what HAL imports to fill the orders
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
Rafale in Croatian Air Force | Military Aviation | 10 | ||
W | Rafale and F 18 super hornet shortlisted by Indian navy | Indian Navy | 21 | |
Indian Navy more likely to select F 18 than rafales | Indian Navy | 164 | ||
Greek Rafale vs Turkish EF 2000 Who has the Technolocal Edge | Military Aviation | 5 |