I personally think India should order 200 Rafales for air force and 57 Rafales for navy.
Are bhai gareeb aadmi ki kidney bechoge kya.
257 Rafale ka kya aachar daalna hai. It doesn't require squadrons and squadrons of planes to have a cutting edge air force. Just get a limited number of 4.5 gen planes and put them in a squadron of less powerful planes such that the 4.5 gen plan leads the pack and other planes are able to see what the lead plane sees with its powerful radar using data sharing. There is no need for entire squadron to be made of expensive planes all with AESA radars, just one plane in a squadron with AESA is enough to get the job done. Otherwise there is no limit to how much money you pour in.
It's not WW2 anymore, where hundreds and hundreds of planes fly in large formations and drop bombs on the trenches.
We have AEWACS, satellites, aerostats, long range ground radars, air defense system (S400, Akash, ADD), SAMs and so many other technologies to maintain air dominance over our own territory. The only advantage jet fighters impart over this is the long range stealth strike capability.
IAF keeps peddling the snake oil of "two front war with China and Pakistan", but if that actually happens, do they actually think there will be dog fights between Indian jets and Chinese jets?
We have all the air defense systems we need to defend our airspace, and we have enough types and numbers of missiles to make long range strikes deep inside enemy territory. The IAF better come up with a better role for themselves instead of hogging this imaginary space of a two front war.
India has fought and won wars when the IAF was at an advantage over enemy air force (Kargil) and when the IAF was at a disadvantage (1965), when the IAF was used (1971) and when the IAF was not used (1962). The IAF has never been critical to our plans, they are just an orthogonal and redundant capability which overlaps with what our other weapon systems provide. The only niche role they can play which is unique to them is using stealth planes to strike nuclear facilities inside enemy territory. We don't need 1000 jet fighters for that. We already have 1 squadrons of specially modified, heavy duty, Jaguars, 2 squadrons of Mirage and 2 squadrons of SU30 specially made with EMP-hardened electronics and heavy carriages for the nuclear strike role.
Even France decided to get rid of Mirage because they thought having 2 types of planes (Mirage and Rafale) was "too much" and then we have IAF which thinks nothing is too much.
The IAF literally operates all the planes that exist in the universe.
Mig 21 Bison
Mig 29
Mig 25
SU30
Jaguar
Sea Harrier (now retired)
Mirage
Rafale
C17
C130
Chinook
Apache
Sea King
M17
Mig 27
IL76
C295
This is more types of planes than whole of NATO combined.
There are so many planes, I can't even remember their names. Check out this shameful list :
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_active_Indian_military_aircraft
Now they also want to evaluate F16 and Gripen. The IAF needs to put out a white paper explaining what combat scenario they are preparing for. Are they planning to invade Mars?
What is the investment we make in the IAF and how many times have the 'special capabilities' of IAF been used win decisive battles? It's 150$ million a pop for each of these planes. Imagine how many long range radars, stealth destroyers, frigates, BrahMos and Agni missiles you can produce with that kind of money.
#No_Ullu_Banawing