Know Your 'Rafale'

ersakthivel

Brilliance
Senior Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2011
Messages
7,029
Likes
8,762
Country flag
HAL is inefficient, which is the picture of public sector in general. The competitive environment will be created only when two more HAL sized companies exist in India aviation. These companies can only come up in the private sector.

The government should encourage one private sector company to take up military fighter aircraft; and another private company to take up military transport aircraft.
Well HAL is just manufacturing, equal stick should be given to ADA, the lack of domestic competition is really hurting, multiple competitive industry is a must for an environment where timeline and customer satisfaction is given top priority.
mate , HAL is manufacturing tejas from the old Jaguar assebly lines of 1980s vintage. So why accuse it?
Even with this level of tech hal has turned out a dozen Tejas LSPs which have conducted close to 3000 flawless test flights.

if the HAL was so bad why would russian airforce order 64 sets of mission computers , avionics and radar computers from HAL for their own Su-30 MKI version called Su-30 SM?

Infact the first HAL made Su-30 MKi went supersonic on first flight, which has significant composite body parts and will be far lighter and better than russain built Su-30 MKi itself.

it has been begging govt for funds to the tune of 1600 crore to invest in new assembly line with latest tech to make tejas better to the GOI and IAF for years , because investing that money upfront aone justify the meager profit from just 40 tejas mk1 confiremd orders by IAf if that was not possible , it is asking for higher orders for tejas mk1 from IAF to justify putting in its own money.. So far both remained deaf to its pleas.

ADA chief himself has said that this bad production tech has shaved off 6 percent aerodynamic efficiency on LSPs. And he has said that newer fighters made from brand new assembly line will have that additional 6 percent efficiency.

the reason no one was thinking of sparing money for tejas production tech was all the eyes were on for rafael. no prize for guessing the reason.
 
Last edited:

tarunraju

Sanathan Pepe
Mod
Joined
Sep 18, 2009
Messages
9,080
Likes
40,077
Country flag
@tarunraju, I doubt engine to be the problem in Tejas production. Did GE refuse to supply the engines.
Will the U.S. Government agree to supply 100+ engines when that could disturb its South Asia foreign policy in a big way?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

ersakthivel

Brilliance
Senior Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2011
Messages
7,029
Likes
8,762
Country flag
Kaveri program is dead officially. Tejas will only be powered by GE F404/414 engines which BTW have ALL been already delivered and are currently sitting in a HAL warehouse so there is no question of aircraft deliveries being delayed due to the engines. The problems are with HAL and HAL alone!

The Tejas Mk.1 has been thoroughly rubbished by the IAF who have categorically stated it is not fit for combat. BUT it remains a fact that HAL is obliged to produce 40 odd airframes to fulfill placed orders. On current plan, it will only complete this order by 2020! Why? Because it has to somehow stretch out its production line till the Mk.2 enters production...which given that the Mk.2 remains little more than a design concept today is a FAR FAR away prospect! They themselves do not know when the Mk.2 can be ready so they will try to milk the Mk.1 as long as possible. The Tejas line produces a cutting edge high tech aircraft with manual techniques...all of the CFRP body panels are laid BY HAND as HAL has not bothered to invest in the machinery required to do these tasks. This protects the rice bowl of its thousands of employees, gives it an excuse to slow down the production and more excuses to poor quality ( Tejas has had endless troubles for years with CFRP de-lamination )

As evidence of HAL's malpractice...SAAB will have signed a co-operative production agreement, finalized the design, built a production line in Brazil, trained its workforce, started production, completed full flight evaluation and operational clearance, started production and completed deliveries to 2 countries (Brazil and Switzerland) for the Gripen-E in the SAME timeframe that HAL has "planned" for IOC, FOC and hand over of ONE "operational" squadron of Tejas Mk.1 to the IAF...forget about the Mk.2 which isn't even on the horizon right now. Notice that GE has received the order and COMPLETED delivery of the F414IN-56 engine meant for the Mk.2 almost 10 years before the aircraft itself will ever fly....such is the state of our babu-empire
Group captain Suneeth krishna who had close to 400 hours on IAf Mirage-2000 and chief award winning test pilot of tejas has categorically said that in its present configuration,"tejas mk1 itself is equal or better than the 45 million dollar per plane upgraded mirage-2000, and can stand on its own in any theater of war.".

Ace IAF pilot late NTSE chief pervez KHokar has said that ,"Instead of waiting for tejas mk2 , IAF can induct tejas mk1 in hundreds as it is better than mirage-2000 in key respects", a full four years before in 2011 itself.


present IAf chief raha has categorically declared that "there is no doubt in tejas's fighting capability in IAF."
only planted news carrying DDM jour"analists" and retired "chair marshals " are telling packs of lies to discredit tejaa in various "vayu round table Fart Fests"
 
Last edited:

ersakthivel

Brilliance
Senior Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2011
Messages
7,029
Likes
8,762
Country flag
Will the U.S. Government agree to supply 100+ engines when that could disturb its South Asia foreign policy in a big way?
new strategic equations which led to indo-US nuclear deal will pave way for continuous US co operation.

And within a decade we have a better chance of uprating the present k-9 engine under this purposeful new govt.
 

ghost

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2013
Messages
1,234
Likes
2,455
Re: Dassault Rafale wins MMRCA!

Did the defence minister say " 90 rafales or directly purchase from France under GTG" ? or you added the number?
I quote the RM as follows:

"Instead of going through the RFP (Request For Proposal bidding process), where there is lot of confusion, chaos, it is now the situation that 36 will be procured ready to fly. What is to be done with the rest will have to be discussed," Parrikar said.

MMRCA deal: Government may scrap $20 billion project for 126 Rafale fighter jets - The Economic Times

Thus nothing is sure if more nos will be discussed or not and that the discussion will be with French govt and not Dassault.


Sir,The reporter asked what will happen to the rest" 90 rafales" ,will they be made in India?To which DM replied that after a deal is done and terms are set under GTG then we will talk either for more flyaway purchase or for make in india under GTG.This he replied to the question when specifically asked for "90 rafales".He also said that" if " lca mk2 will be ready in time and the deal for additional rafales fail then LCA MK2 will replace mmrca or else some other plane will be bought.

[video]https://youtu.be/kbLJcQltaE0?t=116[/video]

Please clear your doubts through this.
 
Last edited:

ersakthivel

Brilliance
Senior Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2011
Messages
7,029
Likes
8,762
Country flag
Via Defense Aerospace: (bold sections my own words)

India to Sign Rafale Contract By June

PARIS --- French Defense Minister Jean-Yves Le Drian is to shortly travel to India to iron out the details of the direct sale of 36 Rafale fighters for the Indian Air Force, with a view to signing the contract during the Paris air show in mid-June.

Negotiations will continue in parallel for the local production of at least 108 Rafale in India, although it can no longer be assumed that state-owned Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd (HAL) will be automatically involved [wait and see, in any case, not under MMRCA]. Dassault had originally planned to team with India's privately-owned Reliance group and, in the wake of the April 10 announcement of a direct purchase, HAL officials made remarkably (or expectedly) lackadaisical statements to Indian media:
"We did not initiate any concrete step at the HAL for manufacturing the planes here", one HAL official told the India Tribune, adding that "After all, there was never much clarity on whether the deal with Rafale would be finally signed." The official also revealed that HAL had done remarkably little to prepare for Rafale production: "There was never any question of acquiring land or bring together a team for MMRCA", he said. No doubt should remain in anyone's mind that these jokers should be tarred and feathered in the streets! Such a shocking attitude when the entire world sees your complete failure and despite being slapped in the face! Anyone still wonder why Dassault did not want to deal with these morons?

Given that Egypt, which has just ordered 24 Rafales, and India are both in a hurry to receive their aircraft, France will turn over to them its next 49 delivery slots, and will resume its own deliveries after 2019. Dassault currently builds Rafales at a rate of 11 a year, and needs about three years to double it. Validates my earlier views that there will be no quick fix solution! Production ramp up takes a long time as supply chain has to be mobilized first

Indian Defense Minister Manohar Parrikar told reporters in New Delhi on Saturday that "It may take two to two-and-a-half years to get the first plane"¦"¦Fly-away means not tomorrow, it has to be designed as per India's need, plus there is a requirement of working out the price" which he also said would be about 4 billion euros.

As we noted on Friday, a direct purchase will resolve most of the bottlenecks that have blocked the MMRCA contract negotiations over the past three years, and which mostly focus on the price of the 108 Indian-made aircraft and on who would provide their contractual warranty. The fundamental problem, however, is that by codifying and closely regulating as many aspects of defense procurement as it could, India's previous government created a web of red tape so complex and so arcane that mutually-acceptable defense deals have become virtually impossible.

Another – and so far unsaid - factor is that HAL's work-force is not yet capable of assembling aircraft as advanced as Rafale, and the Indian government appears to have realized that it was insisting on an expensive and time-consuming industrial fantasy that it would probably be unable to implement in the short term. Finally, a direct purchase would elegantly sidestep thorny coproduction issues, give India fixed, firm prices guaranteed by the French government, and relieve the current pressure to conclude a license production agreement that suits neither side.

http://www.defense-aerospace.com/art...e-by-june.html
the article is junk.

How do you expect HAL to sunk in money knowing fully well, the scandalous MMRCA contract can never be signed by any govt that shudders at facing the massive irregularities accusations?

Even the 36 rafale buy is conditional on Dassault agreeing to modi's offer to french PM.

Unable to put up with fradulant negotiation tactics , the Modi govt has decided to scrap any form of direct negotiations with Dassault and restrict themselve to French govt which will be responsible for bringing around Dassault.

the one who received the biggest kick in the butt is Dassault, which lost out on the mother of all deals.

meanwhile all those import lobbyists who are crowing that HAL doest have the tech to will shut their mouth once Tejas mk2 and FGFa starts rolling out of HAL lines.

ISRO has already given the order to make cryogenic engines for their GSLV to HAL.

SO the real reason why modi scrapped MMRCA tender was the huge scam built into it by the previousIAF_ UPA regime which failed to shortlist,seal the TOT , price negotiations for the MMCA winner before Financial bids were to expire in 2012.

Now MMRCA backers are beating a slow retreat.

http://economictimes.indiatimes.com...-rafale-fighter-jets/articleshow/46913876.cms

MMRCA deal: Government may scrap $20 billion project for 126 Rafale fighter jets - The Economic Times

MMRCA deal: Government may scrap $20 billion project for 126 Rafale fighter jets - The Economic Times

"The government has bought time now," said Muthumanickam Matheswaran, a former Air Marshal in the Indian Air Force. Future purchases "could be that aircraft, or it could be another aircraft", he said.

GOI has not just bought time, it has closed down the scandal called MMRCA.
"That is an indication that the RFP that has been hanging for more than three years is finished," said Matheswaran, who advises Hindustan Aeronautics.

Read more at:
MMRCA deal: Government may scrap $20 billion project for 126 Rafale fighter jets - The Economic Times
matheswaran is one of the prime MMRCA backer and tejas killer. Govt hasn't bought time. It just threw the scandalous MMRCA contract out of the window and limit rafale buy to 36. because by 2020 I have no doubt that the Modi govt would bring FGFA on line. So there will be no rationale to induct rafale after that.

Bharat Karnad, a professor at the Centre for Policy Research in New Delhi, told Reuters the Rafale deal was an "unmitigated disaster" that would not solve the needs of the air force, offers India nothing in the way of technology transfer and diverts funding from building an Indian-made fighter jet.

"If there was a critical requirement to make up fighter squadrons quickly, then there is no better way than putting an indent with the Russians for more Su-30MKIs," he said.
Obviously it would have been more prudent course of action which was initially hinted at by DM himself. but may be keeping strategic relationship with france played a part in this 36 rafale deal. And modi govt restricts itself to negotiating with french govt not Dassault anymore.

It proves their total lack of faith in MMRCA negotiations adapted by Dassault.

What is most important is if Dassault plays truant GOI is now free to negotiate with any other maker to buy even this now contracted 36 fighters with Dassault.

GOI saw through the all sham arguments put forward by dassault and just cut it off from negotiations is something true, that cannot be denied by anyone.

SO instead of mother of all deals now Dassault has the lolipop of all times in its hands in the form of 36 rafale order and GOI frees itself to induct what it feels right in IAF.

HAL is manufacturing tejas from the old Jaguar assebly lines of 1980s vintage. So why accuse it?

Even with this level of tech hal has turned out a dozen Tejas LSPs which have conducted close to 3000 flawless test flights.

Group captain Suneeth krishna who had close to 400 hours on IAf Mirage-2000 and chief award winning test pilot of tejas has categorically said that in its present configuration,"tejas mk1 itself is equal or better than the 45 million dollar per plane upgraded mirage-2000, and can stand on its own in any theater of war.".

Ace IAF pilot late NTSE chief pervez KHokar has said that ,"Instead of waiting for tejas mk2 , IAF can induct tejas mk1 in hundreds as it is better than mirage-2000 in key respects", a full four years before in 2011 itself.


present IAf chief raha has categorically declared that "there is no doubt in tejas's fighting capability in IAF."

only planted news carrying DDM jour"analists" and retired "chair marshals " are telling packs of lies to discredit tejaa in various "vayu round table Fart Fests"

if the HAL was so bad why would russian airforce order 64 sets of mission computers , avionics and radar computers from HAL for their own Su-30 MKI version called Su-30 SM?

Infact the first HAL made Su-30 MKi went supersonic on first flight, which has significant composite body parts and will be far lighter and better than russain built Su-30 MKi itself.

it has been begging govt for funds to the tune of 1600 crore to invest in new assembly line with latest tech to make tejas better to the GOI and IAF for years , because investing that money upfront aone justify the meager profit from just 40 tejas mk1 confiremd orders by IAf if that was not possible , it is asking for higher orders for tejas mk1 from IAF to justify putting in its own money.. So far both remained deaf to its pleas.

ADA chief himself has said that this bad production tech has shaved off 6 percent aerodynamic efficiency on LSPs. And he has said that newer fighters made from brand new assembly line will have that additional 6 percent efficiency.

the reason no one was thinking of sparing money for tejas production tech was all the eyes were on for rafael. no prize for guessing the reason.

All HAL made ALHs are ferrying stuff to Siachen heights, (no other light helo in the world can do that in indian himalayn conditions.) without any fuss,

So instead of accusing HAL and expecting them to be ----No doubt should remain in anyone's mind that these jokers should be tarred and feathered in the streets! Such a shocking attitude when the entire world sees your complete failure and despite being slapped in the face! Anyone still wonder why Dassault did not want to deal with these morons?

If the GOI focus on giving the much needed funds and resource in men power and infra to HAL and other local research and production firms along with big orders we can see wonders on the ground.

Sack full of missiles are made by indian producrion PSUs with active participation of private sector and inducted into indian armed forces without any fuss.

So no need to doubt HAL on production count.
 
Last edited:

ersakthivel

Brilliance
Senior Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2011
Messages
7,029
Likes
8,762
Country flag
Rafale deal an unmitigated disaster – Bharat Karnad of CPR | idrw.org
: The Su-30MKI has been in service since the late 90s. If it can fill the requirement, then what was the need for the MMRCA (medium multi-role combat aircraft) tender in the first place?

A: You tell me what the need is. In fact, as I have argued, the entire concept of a medium, light, heavy combat aircraft categories are unique to IAF and entirely spurious.
Q: If not Rafale, what other option did the air force have?
A: If there was a critical requirement to make up fighter squadrons quickly, then there is no better way than putting an indent with the Russians for more Su-30MKIs. Parrikar actually favoured that as an alternative to Rafale.

Q: Is this because the aircraft are of very poor quality?

A: No, Rafale are not poor quality, but India will have to pay an arm and a leg for it at over $200 million per unit cost. While the more advanced Su-30, as Parrikar noted, with full ordnance load comes in at less than half the price.

Q: Why do you call the deal an "unmitigated disaster"?

A: Unmitigated disaster because
– it won't solve IAF's immediate needs, which induction of more Su-30s can do. The first Rafales will come in by 2017 at the earliest, more likely 2018
– it torpedoes the entire TOT (transfer of technology) and "Make In India" angle, and
– while rescuing the French combat aircraft industry, deprives the Indian Tejas Mk2 and the advanced medium combat aircraft projects of much needed funding to get going.

Q: So has the government been advised wrongly?

A: Given the enormous price differential between the Rafale and Su-30 options, the decision makes no sense, unless it is that the government of India has bought into the IAF's argument that it needs to diversify its sources of hardware. All this means that the Indian Air Force and the country are in hock to many more countries, and can be manipulated by them in the foreign policy arena and in crises. I am quite sure the PM was not offered the alternative to consider by the MEA-IAF-NSA combine.

Q: The Su-30MKI has been in service since the late 90s. If it can fill the requirement, then what was the need for the MMRCA (medium multi-role combat aircraft) tender in the first place?

A: You tell me what the need is. In fact, as I have argued, the entire concept of a medium, light, heavy combat aircraft categories are unique to IAF and entirely spurious.

Q: But if you keep buying Russian hardware, you risk being manipulated by them?
A: The reality is this – Russia post-Crimea is getting into deep financial waters and India holds the whip hand in its reins with Moscow, which is not the case with our reins with France.

Q: Is there a quid pro quo in the form of a nuclear deal? The PMO has been tom-tomming the L&T-Areva deal.

A: The N-deal for Areva, which is equally questionable is on a separate track; not connected with the MMRCA issue.

Q: What, in your opinion, should be the requirement of the IAF?

A: IAF needs can be fully met with a mix in the medium-term future – next 15-20 years – of Su-30s for strike and air superiority, MiG-29Ms (latest variety) for long-range air defence, and LCA Tejas Mk-Is and IIs for short-range air defence.

Q: What should the government's priorities be in defence expenditure? Did the first full budget by Finance Minister Arun Jaitley address those issues?
A: No, Jaitley's budget did not address the MOD (Ministry of Defence) priorities, but that's Parrikar's job. The top priorities should be to beef up capabilities against China, especially three – not one – offensive ops mountain corps, and getting another Akula-II SSN from Russia.

Q: In your view, does the IAF not need a medium multi-role combat aircraft?
A: Not, MMRCA is a dubious need expressly favoured by the IAF to go Western, rather than making fiscal sense or serve the national interest.

Q: But the Tejas was under development for more than 25 years and is still nowhere near the final product.

A: Time delays and cost escalation is par for the course for all new combat aircraft programmes. Consider the US F-35 costing a trillion dollars, over 20 years, nearly 8-10 years overdue and operationally still an absolute disaster. And this is with an established defence industry, mind you.

Q: Can you list India's top three threats in terms of countries?
A: China, China and China.

Q: That big a threat?
A: Yes, because unless India is able to achieve at least notional parity in conventional and nuclear military terms with China, the coercive pressure from that end will be virtually irresistible in the years to come.

Q: Can India still go ahead with buying Typhoon?
A: No, Typhoon has its own developmental and operational problems and its serviceability in the German Luftwaffe is some 39 percent.

Q: It's 36 ready-made Rafales and 90 to be produced in India with transfer of technology, right?
A: The question is TOT and licence manufacture at what price? After all, the price negotiation committee got stuck in talks with Dassault over precisely the French-sourced and HAL-built Rafales.

Q: How are Indian firms positioned to take Modi's defence push? Do L&T, Pipavav have the technological capabilities?

A: If HAL is disfavoured as per Modi's remarks, then Indian private corporations will have to pick up the slack. But they do not have the physical facilities for production like HAL does, and it will cost $5-8 billion to put up a production line. Can L&T or anybody else invest so much without the guarantee of future custom beyond Rafale?

Q: Russia supplies similar hardware to China as well as India. Doesn't broadening the military partnership make sense for India?
A: No, because Russia is apprehensive of China because of its security problems in Siberia, border, etc. with China, always sells less than the cutting-edge stuff to PLAAF (The People's Liberation Army Air Force). Moscow is more open about tech when dealing with India.

Q: Wasn't the deal finalized by the previous government?

A: No, there was no deal finalized with the UPA government, only a commitment to negotiate an appropriate contract to meet IAF's so-called MMRCA needs. Nothing else. It was completely the BJP government's call.

Q: Do you think securing French aviation from the brink of disaster is a masterstroke in securing the final vote at the UNSC?

A: If you know the history of France, you'd not have asked this question. No, France will not push India's candidature to the UNSC for love or money, other than as a generalized push by US-UK-France, and this won't happen, because it is more profitable to keep New Delhi stringing along.
 
Last edited:

ersakthivel

Brilliance
Senior Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2011
Messages
7,029
Likes
8,762
Country flag
Brainfarts, @Yusufdfi took him down on twitter iirc.
If it is brain fart let MMRCA backers prove him wrong point by point.

many guys were making out that IAF couldn't do with out close to 200 MMRCA rafales.

now a well educated DM has called their bluff by saying that upgraded SU-30 MKI is plan B for rafale and put that into practice by cutting Dassault out of negotiating line .

In 2020 FGFA or T-50 will arrive, then there is no justification for rafale 2020 onwards.

thats why NDA govt has ordered 36 rafales(that too conditional upon dassault agreeing to sell their fighters at lower than quoted MMRCA price), that takes care of IAf needs till 2020 and scrapped MMRCA tender, which was what was called upon by karnard due to unaffordable cost relation, Refer to his Scrap MMRCA articles.

no one is going to open their mouth for a long time.

http://idrw.org/the-rafale-conundrum-lessons-to-be-learnt/#more-61884

Admiral Arun prakash says that many of the MMRCA criticism is valid.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Singh

Phat Cat
Super Mod
Joined
Feb 23, 2009
Messages
20,311
Likes
8,403
Country flag
If it is brain fart let MMRCA backers prove him wrong point by point.

many guys were making out that IAF couldn't do with out close to 200 MMRCA rafales.

now a well educated DM has called their bluff by saying that upgraded SU-30 MKI is plan B for rafale and put that into practice by cutting Dassault out of negotiating line .

In 2020 FGFA or T-50 will arrive, then there is no justification for rafale 2020 onwards.

thats why NDA govt has ordered 36 rafales(that too conditional upon dassault agreeing to sell their fighters at lower than quoted MMRCA price), that takes care of IAf needs till 2020 and scrapped MMRCA tender, which was what was called upon by karnard due to unaffordable cost relation, Refer to his Scrap MMRCA articles.

no one is going to open their mouth for a long time.

The Rafale conundrum: Lessons to be learnt | idrw.org

Admiral Arun prakash says that many of the MMRCA criticism is valid.

1. FGFA might not even fructify. Refer to latest news. Also if you have Govt links ask them why aren't they returning Ruskie calls ;).
2. MMRCA was cancelled in part because nobody trusts HAL to deliver and its expensive.
3. MKI as the backbone ? Huge RCS, lights up IRST, hangar queen, and Chinese are fielding similar and/or better crafts.
4. Only 36 Rafale order that too conditional, yeah right.

What Russians will try to do with their paid lobby is to ensure that India atleast buys SU-35BM/MKI/Super MKI as a stop-gap till they "claim" to be working on PAK-FA/FGFA.
 

ersakthivel

Brilliance
Senior Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2011
Messages
7,029
Likes
8,762
Country flag
1. FGFA might not even fructify. Refer to latest news. Also if you have Govt links ask them why aren't they returning Ruskie calls ;).


latest news is parrikar wants FGFAs to be delivered within 36 months of signing the contract and not the original 96 months.
UPA is now out of power and expect new govt to deliver FGFA
2. MMRCA was cancelled in part because nobody trusts HAL to deliver and its expensive.

See , this can go on forever, i have already given many rebuttals that this argument , just few posts above.It is a figleaf for Dassault to hold back on TOT and nothing else.

if it is true why did Dassault CEO claimed that MMRCA contract is 95 percent complete ?

So HAL can absorb 95 percent of TOT by Dassault and can't absorb the 5 percent / If that's the case GOI would have gladly junked that 5 percent and signed the deal.

last head even separate joint guarantee terms have been worked out.

Real reason is the price factor. MMRCA contract is legally unviable because it allowed L1 to jack up price. No government can do that and drown in a sea of corruption allegations and get itself willingly fixed in CAG cross hairs.

thats why Modi is asking France to give them at below the MMRCA price.



latest process depends more and more upon automation and involvement of manpower is minimal.

it is absurd to repeat that when various ,missiles and chandriyan, mangalyan like stuff , built by PSUs deliver, that HAL can not absorb TOT
3. MKI as the backbone ? Huge RCS, lights up IRST, hangar queen, and Chinese are fielding similar and/or better crafts.

the poor 50 percent availability rate was another scandal in its own rights only due to super low stocking of spares by IAF.

With Parrikar seeing through this dirty game availability rate has now crossed 60 percent and will reach 75 percent by the year end.

no one knows the independently verified rafale availability rate as no one besides france operates it. And german airforce typhoon shave an availability rate of 39 percent.

Once a publication mentioned the rafale availability rate of a figure much less than 60 percent , and when countered different spins were offered by rafale backers.

Also global availability rate of all modern fighters is around 70 percent, So when Su-30 MKi reaches that rate year end, all due to better stocking of spares, this blame game will end.

if you dont stock spares any fighter will be hanger queen.

And the two engines of rafale doesnot produce pure mist i suppose.

Once you load weapons on rafale it too will light up any radar like an x mas tree.

Unless IAf wants to send rafales fully empty with nothing but the pistol on Pilot's hips , they can't get low RCS on any mission.

And even if they send it on empty still larger band Awacs radar will identify it. And vector enemy fighters onto it.
4. Only 36 Rafale order that too conditional, yeah right.

What Russians will try to do with their paid lobby is to ensure that India atleast buys SU-35BM/MKI/Super MKI as a stop-gap till they "claim" to be working on PAK-FA/FGFA.
Every one has a paid lobby to ensure their sales. At this age no point in arguing about it.

point is With FGFA 5th gen ability to carry strike weapons concealed in weapons bay arriving in 2020, there is no point in introducing 200 rafales at a heart bleeding 20 billion dollars.
 
Last edited:

Punya Pratap

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2013
Messages
474
Likes
361
Country flag
The only replacement the Rafale is fit for is the Mig 27 (85 in number) and that is what the IAF should have aimed for from the beginning. Instead the IAF itself created a white elephant called MMRCA by projecting a need for 126 jets and there by ensuring a stiff price tag!! Since the Mig 27 is to be retired from 2017/2018 onwards I think these 2 Rafale Squads are meant for replacement.

I assume that any future increase in the G-2-G contract for more Rafales (if at all) will be to shore up the numbers for the Mig 27 replacements. Besides Mig 27 is primarily a Ground Attack and thats exactly the role Rafale should be employed in.
 

ersakthivel

Brilliance
Senior Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2011
Messages
7,029
Likes
8,762
Country flag
http://trishul-trident.blogspot.in/
Eventually, in the fullness of time, the IAF will end up with 189 Rafale M-MRCAs. That's a given. But the negotiations had got stuck over the cost of licenced-production of the 108 units.

India was haggling over the labour cost parameters that are graded from 1 to 10. While the Russians had obtained Grade 6 for the Su-30MKI licenced-production programme, the French were asking for 8, while the Indians wanted it to be limited to 7. So, in the end, a compromise was struck under
which India would order 36 Rafales off-the-shelf without any offsets of any kind and the French in turn would tone down their stance & come down to 7.

Therefore, in nett terms, the French have won and India's illogical negotiating shortsightedness (from 2012 till now) has been fully exposed. And NaMo too has realised at last that there are clear technological and human resource limits to how far the 'Make in India' mantra can be flogged. And this deal for 36 Rafales was conceived entirely by Union Finance Minister Arun Jaitley and was fully endorsed by the PMO.

Everyone else was in the dark on this issue. If 153 Rafales can be similarly ordered in successive tranches, then that will be the ideal solution. Because paying an exorbitant price for the so-called licenced-production of Rafales just to keep a few thousand employees of HAL gainfully employed for the next 20 years DOES NOT stand up to logic. Nor does such licenced-production lead to self-reliance of any kind anywhere.

Far better therefore to utilise the money saved for the Tejas Mk2/LCA (Navy) Mk2 R & D effort, where at least 80% indigenisation can be expected in all domains except for the propulsion system.

If 153 Rafales can be similarly ordered in successive tranches, then that will be the ideal solution. Because paying an exorbitant price for the so-called licenced-production of Rafales just to keep a few thousand employees of HAL gainfully employed for the next 20 years DOES NOT stand up to logic.

Nor does such licenced-production lead to self-reliance of any kind anywhere. Far better therefore to utilise the money saved for the Tejas Mk2/LCA (Navy) Mk2 R & D effort, where at least 80% indigenisation can be expected in all domains except for the propulsion system.
this lying lizard , who can not even let a few comments exposing his ill concealed motivation on tejas,

is still going on in full swing about 189 rafales and india's illogical negotiating tactics.

With DDM freinds like these, who needs enemies?

Misinforming people forever is the job of these dirty hands.

Even a mentally retarded guy couldn't envisage GOI oredering rafales in batches till it reches 189 well into 2030!!!

When every major airforce is going to spend trillions on 5th gen stealth , who in his right mind would leak billions in buying 4th gen fighters produced with 1990s tech?

At least tejas has a niche of filling the mig-21 space in a cost effective manner till AMCA and FGFA comes around. Why should indian continue to buy 189 rafales in tranches to keep the Dassault line running?
 
Last edited:

mayfair

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2010
Messages
6,032
Likes
13,109
point is With FGFA 5th gen ability to carry strike weapons concealed in weapons bay arriving in 2020, there is no point in introducing 200 rafales at a heart bleeding 20 billion dollars.
Is that established? I thought Parrikar mentioned somewhere that it may take longer than that.
 

Latest Replies

New threads

Articles

Top