- Joined
- Oct 22, 2017
- Messages
- 488
- Likes
- 793
CAN BE .Sukhoi 30 to be turned into super sonic test bed for testing jet engines like Kaveri, K9, K10...
not TO BE.
CAN BE .Sukhoi 30 to be turned into super sonic test bed for testing jet engines like Kaveri, K9, K10...
I personally think designing and development of strategic lifter or transportation aircraft will be difficult for now. And keep in mind that endurance level of the engines which are used in these types of aircraft should be very high that's why Chinese till now are using Soloviev D-30 in Y-20 aircraft.Can the kaveri be converted into a high bypass engine for commercial planes or business jets? can't we the design an aircraft for AEWCS and marine time patrol purposes baSd on that engine...like Japan has done with their kawasaki P1 by converting XF5-1 low by pass to XF7 engine.View attachment 46653View attachment 46654
A lot of stuff is getting online as how it is being made may not be goodView attachment 46063
Indigenously developed and integrated with the help of foreign collaborator M/s International centre for Electron beam technologies, Kiev, Ukraine
Specifications
Depending on requirements, Electron Beam Physical Vapour unit has been fitted with traditional evaporators (water-cooled crucibles with vertical shafts for displacement of evaporation ingots). The load chamber has the capability of cleaning of the job surfaces and fixing of jobs before moving into the working chamber. Electron beam guns are fitted with a two-stage system of differential high-vacuum pumping, allowing implementation of the evaporation process, it has capabilities with purging of various gases into the working chamber.
Details
A high energy electron beam physical vapour deposition (EBPVD) coating process which allows high deposition rates, precise composition and microstructural control capable of depositing thermal barrier coatings with MCrAlY as a bondcoat and high temperature oxidation resistant coatings that are used on gas turbine blades of aero-engine and power generating industries. The facility is capable of depositing coating of thickness ranging from a micron to a few mm, and also coatings with graded structure and properties.
More details about the system
India lost a golden chance of letting an aeroengine manufacturing company without making any firm desition. At least a private company like bharat forge or tata should have cashed in this great opportunity.I personally think designing and development of strategic lifter or transportation aircraft will be difficult for now. And keep in mind that endurance level of the engines which are used in these types of aircraft should be very high that's why Chinese till now are using Soloviev D-30 in Y-20 aircraft.
BUt i think we can build medium weight transport aircraft and business aircraft with HAL build HTFE-25.
India lost a golden chance of letting an aeroengine manufacturing company without making any firm desition when we had good money, geo political favoriteness at hand.India is an expert at loosing many once in lifetime chances like that an we spend in unwanted areas where there is no requirement at all I.e misplaced priorities. At least a private company like bharat forge or tata should have cashed in this great opportunity.Cunning Chinese are very adept at utilizing such situations to the most. I think a similar agreement as Chinese with the company would have given India a very good chance to get a an overall design, manufacture, production ideas wherein further we could have minimized a lot of production glitches in our current Indian engines. We could have got ready made working engines for ships or Russian origin planes etc....India lost a golden chance of letting an aeroengine manufacturing company without making any firm desition. At least a private company like bharat forge or tata should have cashed in this great opportunity.
Recently Bombardier sold its Q400 production line... couldn't one of our pvt players bought it and bring tye production line to india.India lost a golden chance of letting an aeroengine manufacturing company without making any firm desition when we had good money, geo political favoriteness at hand.India is an expert at loosing many once in lifetime chances like that an we spend in unwanted areas where there is no requirement at all I.e misplaced priorities. At least a private company like bharat forge or tata should have cashed in this great opportunity.Cunning Chinese are very adept at utilizing such situations to the most. I think a similar agreement as Chinese with the company would have given India a very good chance to get a an overall design, manufacture, production ideas wherein further we could have minimized a lot of production glitches in our current Indian engines. We could have got ready made working engines for ships or Russian origin planes etc....
India lost a golden chance of letting an aeroengine manufacturing company without making any firm desition when we had good money, geo political favoriteness at hand.India is an expert at loosing many once in lifetime chances like that an we spend in unwanted areas where there is no requirement at all I.e misplaced priorities. At least a private company like bharat forge or tata should have cashed in this great opportunity.Cunning Chinese are very adept at utilizing such situations to the most. I think a similar agreement as Chinese with the company would have given India a very good chance to get a an overall design, manufacture, production ideas wherein further we could have minimized a lot of production glitches in our current Indian engines. We could have got ready made working engines for ships or Russian origin planes etc....
Our active research on higher thrust engine may have already started.govt. sanctioned a project called ' high efficiency high temp. turbine' in 2017....drdo chief reddy in many interview also mentioned higher thrust aero engine as a active project
Can you provide a link?
Thanks in advance.
Do check the facts before writing. Kaveri engine thrust to weight ratio is 7.8 and not 6.0.The T/W ratio of Kavery is only about 6.0 ,about one generation behind F110 , AL31 and WS10... it is reasonable that Kavery is the tech of 1970s,about 40 years behind Yankees.
If kaveri's weight is above 1200 kg then surely it's T/W is not above 7. I don't know how it is quoted to be 7.8, with just 81kn maximum thrust it's weight should be 1050 KGs approx to have T/W of 7.8.Do check the facts before writing. Kaveri engine thrust to weight ratio is 7.8 and not 6.0.
Thrust of kaveri is not 65kn it is 78kn-81kn.
The T/W ratio of Kavery is only about 6.0 ,about one generation behind F110 , AL31 and WS10... it is reasonable that Kavery is the tech of 1970s,about 40 years behind Yankees.
This isn't bad by all means.Do check the facts before writing. Kaveri engine thrust to weight ratio is 7.8 and not 6.0.
Thrust of kaveri is not 65kn it is 78kn-81kn.