Rahul Singh
Senior Member
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2009
- Messages
- 3,652
- Likes
- 5,790
In first quote you replied that changing to smokeless propulsion meant the original plan failed. And very next quote you want to question the requirement of Smokeless propulsion?That only means one thing: the original plan was failed. The existing and mature technologies that India has are not good enough to support this plan. That is why Indian scientists have to take risk of implementing new technologies by the end of project.
Why a smokeless propulsion is a necessary for a BVR air-air missile? Is this required by force or added-in by fantasy scientists?
Oxymoronic and a case of cluelessness about context and the topic.
And the context is?No, what people fail to understand is that any weapon procurement is not scheduled on dream. It is generally decided by your expectation of your enemy's technology development, weapon deployment, etc, etc. Too long time overdue will make the weapon of the project no longer effective when face with latest enemy weapon. Certainly, you shouldn't be surprise that user will put down a new requirement.