how many nuclear weapons,space launches and moon missions AUSSIE achieved?
Do the have 5000 km nuclear ballistic missiles like AGNI?
So how do you compare the aussie and indian infra in the above fields?
Post some sensible stuff.People posting here browse 100s of other sites and exposure to much more credible news source than you can ever imagine.Be careful before accusing the other guy.
Dpoes that say the submarine was fielded without reactor?
It was the claim of the above daily that the arihant was launched without a reactor.Not the official version or the gospel of truth.That's what I said to contradict someone that the arihant was launched without a reactor.
Indias Nuclear Sub Doesnt Have Working Reactor Yet
first the un named scientist's claim was quoted ,then the official reaction from NATARAJAN BARC scientist was put forth.
"Once big components like reactor vessel, heat exchangers and the lead shielding (for protecting crew from radiation) are transferred to the submarine before closing its shell, the remaining smaller components including the fuel assembly can be introduced later to complete the construction," he said.
no bud head needs to cut open the shell for that.
The land based model was working perfectly for years.So what issues are you expecting from the reactor?
And the officials expect the reactor to go critical in months.
no one launches he first nuclear sub with all system ready, armaments and other systems are fit latter only.That doesnot mean there is no reactor inside.
The core containing fuel rods wont go critical before afew months from the launch,that was the official press release.
then people are saying it has no reactor no armaments,etc,etc using the statements to fit their own perspective.
India already builds submarines here.Do you think it has taken us 60 years to launch a empty steel tube?
SO all un named scientists are the most credible source!!!!!!
and I am a troll.
I and every one else in india know the real stage of the project as it is a free country and no one censors facebook here.
People who don't have the self confidence to let their citizens browse the web freely are naming who is a troll and who is not.
Surely ADA cannot palm off the LCA to IAf like the way you dumped your JF-17 on pak with no radar, no avionics, no chinese engine, in india.
You don't need to turn this J-20 thread into LKG class type"SEE THE PICTURES AND NARRATE YOUR OWN STORY" period of creative thinking.
Meanwhile you guys blithely go on saying that people install radars on a prototype under open skies on the tarmak!!!!! and every one has to bow their head in deference it seems!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Go to RAFALE thread and see for yourself how asea radar is fitted on the nose cone
go to page-13and post no 187 of rafale thread in this forum to see how asea looks
.
.How can that big an asea radar which almost always occupies the entire radom dia fitted from sideways that too on the tarmak?
May be it is the first time in your life that you are seeing aircrafts fitted with asea radr.
!!!!!you guys obtained a few old soviet decommissioned charlie class nuke subs and reverse engineered it as your own nuke sub.so your nuke subs are nothing but poor copies of old soviet charlie class subs
.that's why there is a saying that the chini nuclear subs are the noisiest ones and hence they can be easily detected!
