pankaj nema
New Member
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2009
- Messages
- 10,308
- Likes
- 38,743
Great to see. They are our future.Truly heartwarming
this is the intent, this is everything that is achieved,
They are the future and the seeds have been sowed, they are budding engineers and scientists
all those non entities seething at our space program can cope in perpetuity, this is something that their kids will never get the pleasure of enjoying
Chandrayaan-3 Mission update:
The spacecraft's health is normal.
The first orbit-raising maneuver (Earthbound firing-1) is successfully performed at ISTRAC/ISRO, Bengaluru.
Spacecraft is now in 41762 km x 173 km orbit.
looks ISRO chief is under huge pressure.Scott Manley: India's Flagship Lunar Mission Chandrayaan 3: Will it Brake or Break?
Similar to the Launches from various launch pads in Florida - all next to ocean.
I hope apogee matters here.As LMV3 able to send 10T to LEO. If CY4 can be of 9T mass , will LMV3 able to send this to LEO and from LEO using raising orbit process , will spacecraft travel to moon ?
No info about orbit range ??
No info about orbit range ??
If you want to go to TLI from LEO, good look using more fuel weight than 70-80% of entire current launch mass. Needless to say that it would 5-6 months also instead of one.As LMV3 able to send 10T to LEO. If CY4 can be of 9T mass , will LMV3 able to send this to LEO and from LEO using raising orbit process , will spacecraft travel to moon ?
It's not about the powerful upperstage .... LVM-3 upperstage uses highest thrust upperstage engine in the world today....it's about total payload capacity of the rocket.....if the LVM-3 had 5tons payload capacity to GTO, then it would have directly injected CY-3 into Lunar Transfer Trajectory....for eg Chinese launched 3.85 ton weighing Chang'e-3 & 4 (same weight as CY-3) using LongMarch-3B rockets which had 5ton to GTO capability....Semi-cryo variant of LVM-3 i.e LVM-3SC could directly CY-3 into a LTTThe reasons to not use a high ΔV burn are:
In fact, this is the not the most efficient method. ISRO could've used a weak stability boundary transfer which requires lesser ΔV than Hohmann transfer. However, it will take months to reach moon in this method.
- This is is an unmanned mission. We don't need to send the lander in a few days, when the same can be done with lesser ΔV (using Oberth effect) but requiring more time.
- Second reason is that we don't have an engine with required thrust to apply the required ΔV in one go. We need to reduce mass of the lander to do that (and nobody wants that). That's why the periapsis burn is broken into several smaller burns.
For every launch they visit the goddess changalamma, she is the guardian diety of Sriharikota, iirclooks ISRO chief is under huge pressure.View attachment 214774The world is watching.
View attachment 214773
CY-4 aka LUPEX will be launched using Japanese H-3As LMV3 able to send 10T to LEO. If CY4 can be of 9T mass , will LMV3 able to send this to LEO and from LEO using raising orbit process , will spacecraft travel to moon ?