India's Moon Exploration Program

Indx TechStyle

Kitty mod
New Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2015
Messages
18,416
Likes
56,946
Country flag
Why this time spacecraft will take 1 month time to land on moon ?
We will gradually increase orbit through orbital maneuver is as shown in here for Cdy-2. There is no direct trans-lunar injection.
Any reason why not direct injection . Due to fuel capacity.
Due not having a very powerful upper stage yet unlike US, Russia and China.

ISRO had a program called "PAM-G" back in 2014 to make something similar but it has been ghosted for now.

There are no official or unofficial signals from ISRO to make or modify any rocket for direct MEO, GEO, TLI and TMI insertions.
 

skywatcher

New Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2020
Messages
4,446
Likes
1,344
Country flag
India launches Chandrayaan-3 lunar landing mission
Park Si-soo and Andrew JonesJuly 14, 2023

SEOUL, South Korea — India successfully launched a robotic lunar lander July 14, setting up the nation for its second attempt to soft-land on the moon.

The Chandrayaan-3 spacecraft lifted off on an LVM-3 heavy-lift rocket from Satish Dhawan Space Centre at 5:05 a.m. Eastern Friday as scheduled. Live footage showed the three-stage rocket with two strap-on side boosters soaring into the air with bright yellow exhaust shooting out of its first-stage engines.

The Indian Space Research Organization (ISRO) declared the launch a success shortly after the deployment. “Congratulations India. Chandrayaan-3 has started its journey towards the moon,” said ISRO Director Sreedhara Panicker Somanath said soon after deployment. “Let us wish all the best for the Chandrayaan spacecraft for its journey toward the moon.”

Chandrayaan-3, consisting of a propulsion module, Vikram lander and the small Pragyan rover, is now on a fuel-efficient, three-week-long journey which will see it continually raise its current elliptical Earth orbit and eventually perform a trans-lunar injection maneuver. It is scheduled to arrive in lunar orbit Aug. 5.

Once in lunar orbit, the propulsion module will be jettisoned. The Vikram lander will begin an autonomous descent, expected on Aug. 23 or 24, to a targeted landing site near the lunar South Pole. The landing site is located at 69.37 degrees south latitude and 32.35 degrees east longitude.

ISRO chose the prime landing site using high-resolution photographs and data from Chandrayaan-2 orbiter and NASA’s Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter.

A successful Chandrayaan-3 landing will make India the fourth country in the world to achieve a lunar landing, following the U.S., the former Soviet Union and China. The mission would also be the first to land near the lunar south pole. No previous Moon mission has landed at a lower latitude.

The three main objectives of the mission are to safely land on the lunar surface, collect data and conduct a series of scientific experiments to learn more about the moon’s composition.

The mission is a follow-up to the Chandrayaan-2 lunar landing attempt which failed in 2019 due to a software glitch. That mission carried an orbiter which is still in operation around the moon.

Chandrayaan-1, India’s first moon probe, launched in 2008 and spent a year in lunar orbit hunting for evidence of water molecules. It was then deliberately commanded to crash-land onto the lunar surface in 2009.

Chandrayaan-3 was developed by ISRO and is a two-module configuration. The 2,148-kilogram propulsion module and a 1,752-kilogram lander named “Vikram” which also carries the 26-kilogram Pragyan rover.

The propulsion module will carry the lander and rover from injection orbit to 100 kilometers above the moon. Once on the site, the Vikram lander will deploy the six-wheeled Pragyan rover via a ramp. The solar-powered duo will carry out a set of scientific experiments for the duration of daytime at the landing site. One period of lunar daylight on the moon lasts for fourteen Earth days. Without radioisotope heater units the spacecraft are not expected to survive the deep cold of lunar nighttime.

Vikram carries seven science payloads, including an instrument to measure the local plasma environment, an alpha particle X-Ray spectrometer and a Laser Induced Breakdown Spectroscope (LIBS) module, and the Spectro-polarimetry of Habitable Planetary Earth (SHAPE) payload to study the spectral and polarimetric measurements of earth from the lunar orbit.

The lander will detect seismic activities to provide clues about the moon’s internal structure and measure the plasma density and its variations. It will also measure soil temperature about 10 centimeters beneath the lunar surface throughout the lunar day and contribute to lunar laser ranging studies using a NASA-contributed retroreflector aboard.

Chandrayaan-3 is part of a wider, renewed international interest in the moon. The mission follows six moon landing attempts in the past decade. These include China’s Chang’e 3, 4 and 5 successful lunar landings and the unsuccessful Israeli Beresheet, Indian Chandrayaan-2 and Japanese Hakuto-R Mission 1 missions.

Next month Roscosmos plans to launch its Luna 25 lander. This is expected to be followed shortly after by Japan’s launch of its Smart Lander for Investigating Moon (SLIM) mission. Intuitive Machines plans to launch its IM-1 on a Falcon 9 later this year as part of NASA’s Commercial Lunar Payload Services (CLPS) program later this year, while Astrobotic Technology’s Mission One, also part of CLPS, could also launch before the end of the year on a ULA Vulcan Centaur rocket.

SpaceNews correspondent Andrew Jones contributed from Helsinki, Finland.




Don't read the comment section. It's as poisonous as usual.
i_f25.png
 

Physx32

New Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2019
Messages
1,511
Likes
10,000
Country flag
Any reason why not direct injection . Due to fuel capacity.
The reasons to not use a high ΔV burn are:
  • This is is an unmanned mission. We don't need to send the lander in a few days, when the same can be done with lesser ΔV (using Oberth effect) but requiring more time.
  • Second reason is that we don't have an engine with required thrust to apply the required ΔV in one go. We need to reduce mass of the lander to do that (and nobody wants that). That's why the periapsis burn is broken into several smaller burns.
In fact, this is the not the most efficient method. ISRO could've used a weak stability boundary transfer which requires lesser ΔV than Hohmann transfer. However, it will take months to reach moon in this method.
 

TopWatcher

New Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2022
Messages
1,762
Likes
4,616
Country flag
The reasons to not use a high ΔV burn are:
  • This is is an unmanned mission. We don't need to send the lander in a few days, when the same can be done with lesser ΔV (using Oberth effect) but requiring more time.
  • Second reason is that we don't have an engine with required thrust to apply the required ΔV in one go. We need to reduce mass of the lander to do that (and nobody wants that). That's why the periapsis burn is broken into several smaller burns.
In fact, this is the not the most efficient method. ISRO could've used a weak stability boundary transfer which requires lesser ΔV than Hohmann transfer. However, it will take months to reach moon in this method.
So here efficiency means more days to reach or use less resources.
 

angryIndian

New Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2013
Messages
1,047
Likes
4,269
Country flag
ISRO had a program called "PAM-G" back in 2014 to make something similar but it has been ghosted for now.

There are no official or unofficial signals from ISRO to make or modify any rocket for direct MEO, GEO, TLI and TMI insertions.
I think the Russian Luna 25 will reach the moon orbit before us and perhaps land on the surface before we do.
 

Articles

Top