NoobWannaLearn
New Member
- Joined
- Jun 3, 2022
- Messages
- 8,978
- Likes
- 29,244
Everyone is using sigs they were meant to except Army from SG to NSG to Garuds.
Everyone is using sigs they were meant to except Army from SG to NSG to Garuds.
Gotta be old
this shows Para SF use what’s called a “strong wall” method; entering through one point, whether it’s through a door or by blowing a hole in a wall, and forming a wall of assaulters all with their weapons pointed in/toward the same basic direction. It has some disadvantages too
But didn't Paras changed or in process of changing their kill houses with movable walls?this shows Para SF use what’s called a “strong wall” method; entering through one point, whether it’s through a door or by blowing a hole in a wall, and forming a wall of assaulters all with their weapons pointed in/toward the same basic direction. It has some disadvantages too
- YouTube
Enjoy the videos and music that you love, upload original content and share it all with friends, family and the world on YouTube.www.youtube.com
Movable walls dont change the way you operate, it just changes the training environment. Strong wall doesnt mean the wall is strong or not moving. Dude it really is a tactic. In this, you create a wall or if you want to call it - a line formation of assaulters once you occupy the room. The basic dynamics of CQB are same, as in first man goes here, second man goes there...etc. But the difference comes in how the third and and fourth man take positions to fill the gaps.But didn't Paras changed or in process of changing their kill houses with movable walls?
Strong wall is generally slower than dynamic entry.Movable walls dont change the way you operate, it just changes the training environment. Strong wall doesnt mean the wall is strong or not moving. Dude it really is a tactic. In this, you create a wall or if you want to call it - a line formation of assaulters once you occupy the room. The basic dynamics of CQB are same, as in first man goes here, second man goes there...etc. But the difference comes in how the third and and fourth man take positions to fill the gaps.
View attachment 242736
It does'nt have to do anything with thick or thin walls. Strong wall is a very SWAT team approach to CQB it focuses on holding ground once you occupy the room. Considering how the Indian Army uses it's men as cannon fodder, I am not surprized that Para SF are using it.Strong wall is generally slower than dynamic entry.
Also strong wall method is not desirable in places with thin walls .
While some para units incorporate training for POD, the predominant approach among most units remains the robust wall method. My outfit underwent specialized instruction in advanced CQB/hostage rescue from a Para SF unit, exclusively emphasizing this methodology.this shows Para SF use what’s called a “strong wall” method; entering through one point, whether it’s through a door or by blowing a hole in a wall, and forming a wall of assaulters all with their weapons pointed in/toward the same basic direction. It has some disadvantages too
- YouTube
Enjoy the videos and music that you love, upload original content and share it all with friends, family and the world on YouTube.www.youtube.com
Isreali CQB tactics are overrated as fuckIsraeli LP ftw
Were do you think we should move forward now with our cqb tactics now?Isreali CQB tactics are overrated as fuck
It's a difficult question answer. That's because CQB tactics keep changing. I'm not saying 'limited pentration' - the Isreali tactic is bad. I'm saying it's just hyped. It's slow and carefull. Points of domination and slicing the pie is much better giving the same advantages.Were do you think we should move forward now with our cqb tactics now?
i think it's now time for them to try out every tactic and build out their own and test it out extensively with blue guns .Were do you think we should move forward now with our cqb tactics now?
No wonder they get shit on in conventional war by militantsIsreali CQB tactics are overrated as fuck
when our men blow homesteads with RCLs, people get mad.
Great interview and good insights and sf officer himself saying no we aren't most mordernsed force or have world class weapons just better than rest of infantry hopefully now people understand why we always want only the best for our guys who are amazing at their jobs would be great if they will have equally amazing equipments too.Interview with Lt Gen Prakash Katoch, PARA SF Veteran on Special Forces & Surgical Strikes
Lt Gen Prakash C. Katoch, PVSM, UYSM, AVSM, SC is a Special Forces veteran of the Indian army. Defence Forum spoke to Lt. Gen Prakash Katoch on his thoughts over many things, ranging from Para SF, to special forces of US, UK, Pakistan and China, and lastly with Surgical Strikes. We hope that...defence.in
But do you notice the sasta DFI that posted thisGreat interview and good insights and sf officer himself saying no we aren't most mordernsed force or have world class weapons just better than rest of infantry hopefully now people understand why we always want only the best for our guys who are amazing at their jobs would be great if they will have equally amazing equipments too.
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
W | SSS Defence M72 5.56×45mm carbine which is undergoing trials with the Indian Special Forces | Indian Army | 15 | |
Restructuring of Indian Special Forces | Indian Army | 27 | ||
Indian Armed Forces Special Operations Division (AF-SOD) | Strategic Forces | 106 | ||
H | Modernization of Indian Special Forces | Strategic Forces | 24 |