- Joined
- Feb 12, 2009
- Messages
- 7,550
- Likes
- 1,309
MiG-29K sales might tip scales for Fulcrum
Recent orders for the Mikoyan MiG-29K may pave the way for further successes for the sea-going version of the "Fulcrum," according to RSK MiG. A first batch of MiG-29Ks and KUB trainers for the Indian navy was followed by a second order this March for 29 aircraft. Meanwhile, the Russian navy has decided to buy 26 MiG-29K/KUBs to replace its Sukhoi Su-33s.
RSK MiG highlights the type's low cost, about $40 million, compared to its Western rivals as its key selling point, while offering similar levels of capability. In India, the adoption of the MiG-29K by the navy may influence the air force in the selection of its land-based medium multi-role combat aircraft (MMRCA) fighter, for which the related MiG-35 is one of six competitors. The navy may also look for more aircraft should it extend its short-takeoff-but-arrested-recovery (STOBAR) aircraft carrier fleet beyond the current two vessels.
In the early 1990s, the initial MiG-29K version lost out to the Sukhoi Su-33 to provide the Russian navy with a carrier-borne fighter. But as the service looks to a new generation of STOBAR vessels, the MiG-29K has come back into favor, following successful trials aboard the current carrier Admiral Kuznetsov last fall.
Russian navy chief Admiral Vladimir Vysotsky said the service will acquire three to six new carriers, the design of which should be finalized by the end of this year. This is very good news for MiG, which expects to provide the fighter force for all of them.
There is also significant interest among countries in Southeast Asia for the acquisition of affordable carrier capability, especially in the light of China's carrier program. The low cost of the MiG-29K places it in a good position, should such ambitions crystallize into firm requirements.
http://idrw.org/?p=2520
what type of protection these gun bullets will provide to the ship in todays war senario...?The Phalanx Block 1 configuration features a 20mm Gatling gun, which can fire armor-piercing rounds at 4,500 rounds per minute. It also includes an advanced search and track Ku-band radar with closed-loop spotting technology to provide autonomous target detection and engagement.
http://idrw.org/?p=2634
Are you aware that IAF first sent RFI for new AJTs and later repeated order for more HAWKs. RFI for new naval MRCA have been sent to many and one among them is ROSOBORONEXPORT. So one should be surprised if Navy repeats IAF's because it is still RFI not RFP.With all do respect it sounds more like propaganda to me........First, if India was so thrilled with the Mig-29K. Why would the Indian Navy just put out a RFI for a new Naval Fighter??? Hardly a winning endorsement of the Fulcrum. Nor, one un-noticed by the Indian Air Force.
Do you know Russia is buying french Mistral LHDs? Tell me, if a navy can buy costlier than costliest french systems, here 21,300 ton LHDs then why it can't build 3-6 aircraft carriers by themselves? For your information Russia is making huge money and will be making more as IAF is buying more MKIs and will be buying huge number of Indo-Russian FGFA. In addition to these, Russia is re-entering into civilian airliner market and these are very few examples among many which will increase Russia's wealth in future. Wake-up, this not 1990-2000 but 2010.Also, this talk about Russia acquiring 3-6 more Carriers is well laughable. It doesn't have the funds to develop such a Carrier. Let alone build a fleet of 3-6 of them. As a matter of fact just finding the funds to Refit the Kuznetsov and order a small number of Mig-29K's for itself. Is about all it can do at this stage.
Mate, you are seriously uninformed about the capabilities of an Close-In Weapon System, a crucial component of a surface warship's self defense system !! I suggest you read my thread about CIWS, you will understand the importance of the Phalanx like systems in Naval warfare.what type of protection these gun bullets will provide to the ship in todays war senario...?
amarican will only give us WW2 technology !!!
They are there on American ships and they are refining it even more with the new laser system. It is the last line of defence when you have to throw everything including the kitchen sink to save your boat.what type of protection these gun bullets will provide to the ship in todays war senario...?
amarican will only give us WW2 technology !!!
you are living in WW2 if you say 20mm gun going to provide defense system to a war ship...Mate, you are seriously uninformed about the capabilities of an Close-In Weapon System, a crucial component of a surface warship's self defense system !! I suggest you read my thread about CIWS, you will understand the importance of the Phalanx like systems in Naval warfare.
Here is the link:
http://www.defenceforum.in/forum/showthread.php/9254-CIWS-Close-In-Warfare-System
Actually any decent warship has layered defenses against threats from air e.g anti-ship cruise missiles. At long ranges a ship engages incoming threats with long range SAMs but when somehow SAM fails to intercept hostile missile then at close ranges(WVR) a Close In Weapon System, which can either be a radar controlled gun/cannon like Kashtan, or very short range radar guided SAMs like 'Sea RAM' or combination of both engages the threat. As Yusuf said, It is mainly the last resort against threats.what type of protection these gun bullets will provide to the ship in todays war senario...?
neither the 20mm gun bullet nor your kitchen sink going to stop the incoming missle to hit your boat...They are there on American ships and they are refining it even more with the new laser system. It is the last line of defence when you have to throw everything including the kitchen sink to save your boat.
It seems you didn't go through this thread that I mentioned !! As Rahul and Yusuf have mentioned, the CIWS includes both anti-missile missile and multiple gun systems which are used to destroy any incoming missile against a surface warship. All major naval forces in the world use some sort of CIWS systems on their surface warships. US Navy uses the Phalanx, Russian navy uses the Kashtan, British and Dutch navies use the Goalkeeper CIWS system, Italian navy uses the Dardo, Chinese navy uses the Type 730 CIWS system. If you go through the thread, you will see some great videos posted by members showing how the CIWS systems are able to neutralize the threat from incoming missiles.you are living in WW2 if you say 20mm gun going to provide defense system to a war ship...
what's the range of these 20mm gun...2000m , that's it...
inpresent war senario not even in wildest of case that a enemy aircraft/heli going to came so near to a warship ..
war ships will be targetted by a incoming fighter plane which will fire missile at it from a distance of 100km....and these war ship will be tagetted from a distance of 200km by Harpoon like cruse missiles....
No Agan I will never suggest the Freestyler to the Navy....It will be a good addition to our Army Aviation wing...But not for fleet defence.As like Sathish said in another thread, How about reviving the Yak-141 program? It is a potent fighter if it evolves
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
Game: 1971 Indian Naval Front | General Multimedia | 10 | ||
W | France set to offer Indian Navy 4 upgraded 'used' Naval Rafale jets. @gauravcsawant brings you the details. | Indian Navy | 0 | |
Pakistan's naval buildup is quite concerning. | Pakistan | 256 | ||
New Indian Naval Base at Ankola, Karnataka | Indian Navy | 0 |