porky_kicker
New Member
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2016
- Messages
- 6,030
- Likes
- 44,621
IMO the Chinese threat of armour should be addressed in 2 waysWhy are the good jernails getting fixated on light tanks?
Looks like more articles have been written about light tanks than any other IA equipment related subtopic during this escalation.
1. Symmetric : expand the threat envelope horizontally
Eg.
Light tank from drdo and L&T armed with cockerill 120 mm gun , or/combination
Kestrel mounted with cockerill 120 mm gun , or/combination
Kestrel with 120 mm automated mortar with smart top attack munitions , or/combination
BMP 2 based NAMICA .
2. Asymmetric : expand the envelope vertically while simultaneously using assets which are asymmetric horizontally.
Induct helicopters armed with ATGMs ,
LMVs armed with fire and forget ATGMs / munitions and associated sensors which can provide overhead surveillance and target acquisition eg. Tactical UAVs / mast mounted optronic sensors for hit and run etc possibly reverse slope targetting.
Kalyani 105 mm mounted go anywhere light vehicles for use in both indirect as well as direct fire modes .
Kalyani motorised SPH with cargo rounds filled with top attack munitions.
Current situation can be addressed if we judiciously select the appropriate assets as available in short time as a hedge to current requirements while acquiring others progressively.
indian army has a very defensive mindset . If one wants to win wars , it is necessary not only to address the threat on a peer to peer level but to hold overwhelming advantage with judicious use and selection of assets. Blindly copying the enemy in a tit for tat , will only restrict us - we end up falling in their trap.