armyofhind
New Member
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2014
- Messages
- 1,554
- Likes
- 2,957
Yep. It's called PCB. Combining standard principles of HESH and TB.Traditional HESH ??!!Is there something as nontraditional HESH as well, fuckktard??
Yep. It's called PCB. Combining standard principles of HESH and TB.Traditional HESH ??!!Is there something as nontraditional HESH as well, fuckktard??
I'm sure Kunal will refuse to testify to the mythical resistance (as raised by you) of a Mud and stone wall against a tank fired HESH round.Ask @Kunal Biswas if you are finding my words that much hard to believe!!He can confirm if I'm making stuffs up or merely stating the truth!!Now fuckk off!!
Sure.. Spall Liners. I missed the terminology there.Abbe naam toh dhang se kar lia kar!!It's called spall liners, usually made of aramid materials.I know it costs money and that's exactly why I suggested the use of mud and stones for erecting outer walls!!
Actually, I have and you do not even realise it, you would need a functioning brain for that, which is obviouly lacking in your case!!You haven't managed to "shame or ridicule me."
Hey man, this is not the way to speak about your mom??You are talking about your mom, right??So, she's a little bitch, how little??I'm curious.little bitch.
Nope, actually it's you who has consistently displayed his complete lack of any knowledge about things he speaks and also, pulls out 'facts' from his little behind!!Just don't put your fingers in your mouth without first washing them!!All you've managed to do is display your imbecileness by coming up with "Mud and stone" spaced armor.
It's called 'stabilisation' nigga, and there is just no way to confirm that T90's barrel stabilisation is worse than Arjun!!You are simply pulling it out of your stinky little arse just to save your face you pathetic little goat fuck!!barrel stabilization has got a whole lot to do with accuracy.
Well, that's a new one!!What's if course??But if course
That doesn't apply to me, but you sure have learnt to suck your dick and stick your head up your arse all the while fingering your nose at the same time!!That's quite an achievement.somebody like you with his head up his arse won't comprehend.
Why do I need to see it in action to figure out something so obvious??!!Do you seriously believe that India can compete let alone beat countries like USA or UK or Germany, with their vast experience in designing tanks and AFVs and also their huge investment in their R&D sector??!!You really think that our technology would be at their level with so little time and money spend in out own R&D??Combat data- yes of course. You're the one saying that Arjun is worse off in armor protection than other tanks. So apparently you've seen it perform in combat to make such a statement with misplaced conviction.
Is that supposed to be some insult??Really??Like what are you, 8 or 10??Seriously now, grow up!!And don't worry little girl.
Big words for a kid on diapers!!Putting green emojis in your posts doesn't hide the fact that you're literally off your tenterhooks trying to come up with a comprehensive answer in your neuralgic state.
Green is the color of envy by the way. LOL.
Wow!!That's a good one!!But wait!!How are you aware of the anime series if you are so much of a grown up who despises that stuff??!!Especially when Blood isn't really that much well known outside the fans??So how come you know about it kid??and the concept of tanks turning into something else in combat is probably more relevant to your thought process, since you're such a big fan of anime to even keep your name here based on one.
Yeah, double cheers, son of bitch!!Cheers bitch!
Are you thick in your head or something kid??Or do you suffer from some kind of comprehension issues??Try to get the gist here for crying out loud!!Comparing a round fired from a Carl Gustav RCL to one fired from a tank cannon.
I'm sure the velocities and terminal ballistics involved are the same.
Who said that, because I certainly never said any such thing!!Stop putting words in my mouth kiddo!!All I said was you have no evidence to support your claim that Arjun has better stabilisation systems than T 90s!!How much more you gonna lie, kid??Stop it, it's enough.And get the spelling right, it's getting really annoying now.Sure. The barrel doesn't have any gyro stabilization so it can keep dancing all around as the tank moves.
Nope but in the official brochures!!Where? in your "visions"?
I don't have the source material with me right now but the MkI APFSDS rounds have a muzzle velocity of around 1650 meter/second where as both the Pronit/Cl MkII and 3BM42 Mango attains 1730+ meter/second at muzzle when fired at 520 or something MPa chamber pressure!!And both the Pronit and Mango has got longer and heavier rods, which means higher muzzle energy which in turn would result in to flatter trajectories.Respectfully speaking, please quote source.
So if you are that much confident, why don't you simply ask the dude??And why do you think I would even tell you to do such a thing if I weren't confident myself??I'm sure Kunal will refuse to testify to the mythical resistance (as raised by you)
I said an HE round, not an HESH.Pakistanis do not use a tank with rifled gun and HESH doesn't work in smooth barrels!!I thought you would know this but I guess it was too much to hope for!!Too many kids infesting this sight lately.of a Mud and stone wall against a tank fired HESH round.
Sure.. Spall Liners. I missed the terminology there.
So you're suggesting that a Mud and stone wall emulates the properties of a spall liner made out Aramid/Kevlar.
It has already been done by the Pakistanis all across the LoC, just ask @Kunal as I told you, if you have the confidence to do so!
No problem.Sure.. Spall Liners. I missed the terminology there.
No I never suggest that.I said, an outer wall, made of mud and stones, if thick enough, like 3 feet or so, can achieve enough mass and sectional density to actually be able to detonate the HESH rounds before they can make contact with the actual concrete wall, there by rendering the rounds completely ineffective.No wonder the Pakistanis are doing the same all across the LoC (again, just ask Kunal, I'm telling you againIndian Army arsenal is the HESH rounds, and that in turn prompted the development of this new fuel-air explosive based round.So you're suggesting that a Mud and stone wall emulates the properties of a spall liner made out Aramid/Kevlar.
which means higher muzzle energy which in turn would result in to flatter trajectories.
They don't have to because the mud walls are erected to prematurely detonate the rounds, before they can hit the concrete walls underneath!!You would need to expend several HESH rounds before you can make contact with actual concrete wall and neutralise the occupants with spallings.But in doing so, you render your tank vulnerable to ATGM attacks by the occupants of the said pillbox as well.But a single hit from a thermobaric round can do the job.Its a cheap alternative to put in mass around bunkers, But if shot by a 120mm HESH it will not survive, Such fortifications are effective against 51-80mm mortar direct hits ..
That was true before the advent of digital FCS with advanced ballistic computers, mated with highly sensitive meteorological sensors and gun stabilisation systems so advanced and sensitive to the minutest of the vibrations that you can literally place a glass full of tea over the tank gun and run the tank over rugged terrain without spilling out even a drop!!That far ahead we have come as far as gun stabilisation is concerned.Higher velocity has nothing to do with accuracy, In a small size experiment one can test smooth-bore gun with a rifled gun, Smooth-bore always have higher muzzle velocity but low accuracy ..
Not at all!!PCB works nothing like a HESH but exactly like a regular thermobaric munition!!It's just that DRDO follows some weird terminology instead of the establitablished ones, like terming APFSDS as FSAPDS and stuff like that!!"Penetration Cum Blast",really?? Height of chutiyappa if you think about it!!Yep. It's called PCB. Combining standard principles of HESH and TB.
That was true before the advent of digital FCS with advanced ballistic computers, mated with highly sensitive meteorological sensors and gun stabilisation systems so advanced and sensitive to the minutest of the vibrations that you can literally place a glass full of tea over the tank gun and run the tank over rugged terrain without spilling out even a drop!!That far ahead we have come as far as gun stabilisation is concerned.
They don't have to because the mud walls are erected to prematurely detonate the rounds, before they can hit the concrete walls underneath!!You would need to expend several HESH rounds before you can make contact with actual concrete wall and neutralise the occupants with spallings.But in doing so, you render your tank vulnerable to ATGM attacks by the occupants of the said pillbox as well.But a single hit from a thermobaric round can do the job.
Apart from all these, what I feel compel IA to choose rifled gun over smooth bore is lack of required Tank simulator for firing exercise. Rifled guns are more accurate then smooth bore ones over a distance, but the downside of it is the lost of KE of the rounds it fires till that distance and its being maintenance heavy.That does not depend by a fact based on two points following :
1. Tank barrel life degrades ( T-72M1 barrel in Indian Army has life of only 250rnds back in 2001, T-90 bhishma`s has 500rnds as 2010 ) with high pressure rounds, In its life majority in peace time it fires low pressure rounds such as HEAT and HE even in exercise mostly ..
2. In conflict, A Tank is called upon providing close support to Infantry or creating deep penetration in enemy lines, Majority of times a tank vs tank battle are rare ..
Not some theory but in practice around the globe, You can conform this to any service man in Armour of any country you like ..
===================
Indian Army on purpose pitched for Rifled gun on purpose, As told before multiple factors are responsible for an result, People in Army who advocate for rifled gun were proved correct in combine trails,
Every gun has some degree of error in zeroing regardless what ever FCS they use, Its lesser with Rifled gun with regular rounds from a tank gun, Its simple physics ..
Selected people who come up with strange RFI were entertained before, Its not the same any longer, I don`t want to start abt this particular subject in this thread as the topic is covered in various others before various times ..
==================
Arjun`s gun had 120mm HEAT but was not called into service, It might be easily said than done by multiple PHDs and with cores of rupees, Our scientific community is not a stupid, Majority of delays are caused by red tapes and error in official documentations so does poor work by L1 bidders ..
Indian Army make requirement taking regional threads, Not global ..
I don't think INDIA is looking for Abrahams .PM Modi`s new deal with America & Russia for Abraham Super Tank, M777 howitzer & S-400 SAM
A completely false assertion!!Apart from all these, what I feel compel IA to choose rifled gun over smooth bore is lack of required Tank simulator for firing exercise. Rifled guns are more accurate then smooth bore ones over a distance, but the downside of it is the lost of KE of the rounds it fires till that distance and its being maintenance heavy.
What is the status of the ATGM? AFAIK LAHAT has been dropped from the plan.
A completely false assertion!!