scatterStorm
New Member
- Joined
- May 28, 2016
- Messages
- 2,243
- Likes
- 5,360
This is USAF doctrine where front-line fighter say F22 going deep in enemy territory for intelligence gathering and later data linking info to other air superiority assets in the airspace is something we still don't practise. We can but we don't do it like that. In fact F22s don't even go deep inside enemy territory, e.g. is the recent push into Syrian airspace for bombing ISIS targets (we all know it didn't went there to do that) ... it may have just utilised it's powerful radar to look beyond, thus mitigating the risk to fly alone.I have a another theory , wat if downed pilot was su30 one but we all know su30 service availability so during scramble time he won't have su30 so he fall back to mig21 where his wing man was su30, also the downed pilot was wing commander he will be the lead aircrfai those who know the areai engagement the lead aircraft is the one take the calls, while su30 act as support, due to some constrian wing man have to fall back and protect the maon target while cue uping jf17 or mirages come with strike package hw04 SOW while wing man locked them on radar with r77-1 they flee ,while wing comandcom on presuit of Air defence fighter f16 try to go super sonic and crossed the loc while he got solution and fired r73 downing f16 but airdefnse of f16 wing man pilot made a lock on mig21 and shoot it also down
SU30 MKIs bars radar is powerful enough to do that without going deep into enemy territory. The IAF just played supposedly the Cope 2004 tactic, using the Mig 21s go blind and Mig-21 pilots were fed info via comm links.
This also gives weight to why IAF pilots don't use Bars in air exercises, it has some advantage after all.
Just to put some more perspective, the bars radar can detect F16 within distances of 140-160 km ahead.
here's what Retired U.S. Air Force Major General Michael Snodgrass, then a colonel commanding the 3rd Wing at Elmendorf Air Force Base in Alaska, which had sent jets to take part in the exercise, said that the Bisons and the Su-30MKIs proved to be the most formidable opponents. “The outcome of the exercise boils down to [the fact that] they ran tactics that were more advanced than we expected... They could come up with a game plan, but if it wasn't working they would call an audible and change [tactics in flight],”
Interesting thing is ... notice these lines ... "they would call an audible and change tactics in flight" ... this means voice communication were taking place b/w mig 21 and Su30 MKI pilots that day as well, maybe.
Last edited: