India Strikes Against Pakistani Terrorism 2019

[aarav]

We planned to hit it but opted out and went for Balakote. Now, it's time. Saturate their SAM. Can their SAM even handle Brahamos given the distance involved?

More economical would be the prithvi missile ,brahmos are for strategic targets

 

[WARREN SS]

We planned to hit it but opted out and went for Balakote. Now, it's time. Saturate their SAM. Can their SAM even handle Brahamos given the distance involved?

No Pakistani Sam abilities to hit brahmos

 

[SanjeevM]

How many do they have? They already lost 4 lol

As per this news item 5 Pakistani UAVs have been shot so far.
https://www.newsnation.in/india-new...tar-dropped-village--article-216589.html?EOD=

 

[IndiaRising]

Pakis want to create another kargil type situation. Look at the situation. Vajpayee caretaker PM, Modi caretaker PM. Both about to fight important elections

 

[aarav]

Rather than hitting the so called terror camps ,it is time for a decapitating missile strike across the enemy assests,I think govt should consider it seriously .

 

[sorcerer]

We planned to hit it but opted out and went for Balakote. Now, it's time. Saturate their SAM. Can their SAM even handle Brahamos given the distance involved.

Bahawalpur was left out cuz of collateral damage.

But a bit confusing cuz Indian officiall have said we have the capability to take out people in one room without hurting the ones in adjacent rooms..like they said in balakot.
Balakot is a good experiment in that case.


Soo.yeah bahawalpur can be taken by our forces..when they get confirmation from hum.int about particular targets probably

Other thing is ... Did the dud bomb run using Uav cuz them pakis were running out of patience.. fatigue getting to them... frustration...
Forcing India to act...?

Hmmm

 

[IndiaRising]

Rather than hitting the so called terror camps ,it is time for a decapitating missile strike across the enemy assests,I think govt should consider it seriously .

HVT elimination would be best. Take out gafoora. He’s most visible to common pakis

 

[Nicky G]

More economical would be the prithvi missile ,brahmos are for strategic targets

True, but using just one Bhramos will scare the shit out of Porkies. They have no counter to it, they know it but try to deny it. This will tear apart that facade. Plus, another barrier of India raining supersonic missiles on jihadis will have tremendous physiological impact.

Downside, risk of civilian casualty (I personally don't care) and retaliation by Porkies, they are asking for it.

 

[Nicky G]

Bahawalpur was left out cuz of collateral damage.

But a bit confusing cuz Indian officiall have said we have the capability to take out people in one room without hurting the ones in adjacent rooms..like they said in balakot.
Balakot is a good experiment in that case.


Soo.yeah bahawalpur can be taken by our forces..when they get confirmation from hum.int about particular targets probably

Other thing is ... Did the dud bomb run using Uav cuz them pakis were running out of patience.. fatigue getting to them... frustration...
Forcing India to act...?

Hmmm

More than that, I think we did not want an escalation that would happen if we hit Bahawalpur. Also, the mission would have been much riskier considering the protections.

However, now that it's going mainstream that Porkie drones are dropping bombs at Indians homes, Modi has to act or his security tag goes for a toss, which is what Porkies want.

 

[aarav]

True, but using just one Bhramos will scare the shit out of Porkies. They have no counter to it, they know it but try to deny it. This will tear apart that facade. Plus, another barrier of India raining supersonic missiles on jihadis will have tremendous physiological imp and.

Downside, risk of civilian casualty (I personally don't care) and retaliation by Porkies, they are asking for it.

Brahmos is a strategic weapons will be used as first strikes on their strategic assets in an event war ,if govt fires brahmos then it's war or else you would be in a bind of use it or loose it ,if not used properly

 

[sorcerer]

True, but using just one Bhramos will scare the shit out of Porkies. They have no counter to it, they know it but try to deny it. This will tear apart that facade. Plus, another barrier of India raining supersonic missiles on jihadis will have tremendous physiological imp and.

Downside, risk of civilian casualty (I personally don't care) and retaliation by Porkies, they are asking for it.

Civilian casualties de-escalate things much faster also lots of optics for anti India media

Already the media is pro Islamic

 

[SanjeevM]

True, but using just one Bhramos will scare the shit out of Porkies. They have no counter to it, they know it but try to deny it. This will tear apart that facade. Plus, another barrier of India raining supersonic missiles on jihadis will have tremendous physiological impact.

Downside, risk of civilian casualty (I personally don't care) and retaliation by Porkies, they are asking for it.

Best HVT would be taking down a couple of Pakistani submarines and a couple of ships with naval Bramhos.

 

[Jay99]

Pakis want to create another kargil type situation. Look at the situation. Vajpayee caretaker PM, Modi caretaker PM. Both about to fight important elections

But end result will be different.. bajpai was softy.. modi is a monster

 

[Niks_12]

Or maybe the Bakis thought that a drone strike will not change the threshold of conflict. But bombing is a serious issue and should be dealt with as such.

 

[Nicky G]

Brahmos is a strategic weapons will be used as first strikes on their strategic assets in an event war ,if govt fires brahmos then it's war or else you would be in a bind of use it or loose it ,if not used properly

Attack on military installation by PAF was an act of war. It's just not been declared.

Other countries use missiles, including supersonic ones at terror hideouts all the time. If we're following the WoT template, this would fit right in.

However, I don't care if it's Brahamos or Prithvi, as long as the target gets taken out.

 

[sorcerer]

Or maybe the Bakis thought that a drone strike will not change the threshold of conflict. But bombing is a serious issue and should be dealt with as such.

The bomb didn't explode.
May be it's on purpose.
They are testing ground minus escalation.
That was their version.

But india should retaliate for every violation like we did at chakoti

Burn paki assets for every violation and dud bombs

 

[Kazah]

what kind of bomb is that ? Looks more like an anti aircraft shell

 

[sorcerer]

what kind of bomb is that ? Looks more like an anti aircraft shell

How much can pak drones carry?
Any figures available

 

[Niks_12]

Bakis would have got the drones along with the armaments. Any publicly available image can be compared with the pictures we have here.

 

[rone]

Bakis would have got the drones along with the armaments. Any publicly available image can be compared with the pictures we have here.

chill its Chinese toy not that much both missile and UCAV are same name

spec abt missile
AR-1
The AR-1 is reportedly another development of the HJ-10. It is a missile specifically designed to be carried by unmanned combat air vehicles (UCAV),[13] such as the CH-3, which was unveilled at the 7th Zhuhai Airshow held at the end of 2008, when the AR-1 also made its debut. The AR-1 is similar in size to the HJ/AKD-10, but differs in shape. The diameter of the AR-1 is the same throughout its entire length. Two sets of control surfaces of the AR-1 are placed further apart, as opposed to immediately right next to each other in the case of the HJ/AKD-10. Instead of having a much larger set than the other, the sizes of two sets of control surfaces of the AR-1 are similar. The set of control surfaces at the front is swept instead of trapezoid-shaped like in the HJ/AKD-10, and they are closer to the tip of the missile. Although the developer has claimed that the AR-1 can be armed with several types of seekers, such as TV, Imaging IR (ImIR), and semi-active laser homing, only the TV guided version was shown to the public. The AR-1 cannot be guided by MMW radar, as many internet claims had erroneously reported, because the radars are too heavy to be carried by UAVs. Despite the developer's claim that the AR-1 can adopt different guidance systems, only one type of guidance has been confirmed, which is a combination of inertial guidance + satellite guidance (GPS was shown during its debut).

Specifications of the AR-1:

• Speed: 1.1 Mach
• Weight: 45 kg (99 lb)
• Warhead: 10 kg (22 lb)
• Range: up to 10 km (6.2 mi)
• Guidance: inertial + semi-active laser guidance
• Armor penetration: > 1,000 mm (39 in)

The AR-1 can be used against various targets from individual soldiers to tanks and small boats. At the 7th Zhuhai Airshow where the AR-1 made its debut, it was not displayed as an independent exhibit, but as a subsystem of the CH-3 UCAV (CH: Cai-Hong, meaning rainbow), whose developer is not the same as that who developed the AR-1 and thus could not provide many details about the AR-1. However, the developer of the AR-1, the China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation (CASTC) has claimed that the AR-1 missile can also be carried by platforms other than a UCAV. Staff of the CH-3 UCAV developer claimed the AR-1 can be armed with various warheads for different missions, but since the AR-1 was not their product, they did not know the exact types of warheads that have been developed. Judging from its appearance, it is safe to assume that the warhead arming the AR-1 is similar to that of the AKD-10.