India Strikes Against Pakistani Terrorism 2019

Status
Not open for further replies.

Darth Malgus

New Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2016
Messages
2,439
Likes
8,782
Country flag
A post taken from SF.org



The Falcon
Professional


The lull that has been seen over the past few days, is because the Government of India has given time to the major World Powers, including and not limited to China, Russia, US, UK & France, to 'convince' the GoP led by Mr IK Niazi, to walk the talk. Towards this end, the statement by Chinese Foreign Minister Mr Wang Yi today, must be read in the context of what is happening behind the scenes.

Bravado notwithstanding, both GoP and PA have been made clear that there is no world condemnation of Indian actions in present case. That GoI has, inspited of clear provocation by PAF action, reserved the right to take all measures and refrained from undertaking any action and allowed GoP to work towards what it says it is honest in implementing, indicates that Indian action was taken under it's War on Terror and not as War on Pakistan.

That India has refused to declare any stand down in it's posture till terror is stopped, is indicative of India willing to take measures as deemed appropriate if Pakistan fails to show visible, verifiable and concrete steps against any and all entities undertaking acts of terror against India.
 

pankaj nema

New Member
Joined
Oct 1, 2009
Messages
10,308
Likes
38,743
Country flag
A post taken from SF.org



The Falcon
Professional


The lull that has been seen over the past few days, is because the Government of India has given time to the major World Powers, including and not limited to China, Russia, US, UK & France, to 'convince' the GoP led by Mr IK Niazi, to walk the talk. Towards this end, the statement by Chinese Foreign Minister Mr Wang Yi today, must be read in the context of what is happening behind the scenes.

Bravado notwithstanding, both GoP and PA have been made clear that there is no world condemnation of Indian actions in present case. That GoI has, inspited of clear provocation by PAF action, reserved the right to take all measures and refrained from undertaking any action and allowed GoP to work towards what it says it is honest in implementing, indicates that Indian action was taken under it's War on Terror and not as War on Pakistan.

That India has refused to declare any stand down in it's posture till terror is stopped, is indicative of India willing to take measures as deemed appropriate if Pakistan fails to show visible, verifiable and concrete steps against any and all entities undertaking acts of terror against India.
This Person was earlier named
Hell fire ,was also on PDF

He quit the forum , and has come back recently

He is a pacifist and a moderate

I will still prefer Babaji

:biggrin2:
 

muralidon924

New Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2013
Messages
280
Likes
1,520
Country flag
Google should change the map of India in Google analytics.
Jammu and Arunachal has a seprate shade.
This is against the directive of Govt of India.. I guesss
Anyone using analytics..please fo notify the Ministry via twitter.
i once notified ministry and govt twitter handles about microsoft maps there was no response
 

Bleh

Laughing member
New Member
Joined
Nov 23, 2017
Messages
6,239
Likes
26,077
Country flag
i once notified ministry and govt twitter handles about microsoft maps there was no response
Google should change the map of India in Google analytics.
Jammu and Arunachal has a seprate shade.
This is against the directive of Govt of India.. I guesss
Anyone using analytics..please fo notify the Ministry via twitter.
yes....And Government/RBI should print Coin/note like this
We (or Pakis, or Chinks) can show whatever map we want in our own maps. Google is an international organisation, with no obligation to give a fuck.

For them best option is, to show areas the countries actually hold & control.
What should happen is that they must show Siachen as Indian & Crimea as Russian. Claim lines can be dotted... they'll be in India's map when we take them back. It is a privilege that needs to be earned!
 

ashdoc

New Member
Joined
Jul 21, 2010
Messages
2,980
Likes
3,682
Country flag
US ambassador AnnePatterson said this in 2008 according to wikileaks---

"Despite the current economic challenges Pakistan still feels the need to fully invest in its territorial defense. While Pakistan's F-16s certainly have a symbolic, and perhaps emotional, salience they are also directly tied to the existential threat Pakistan perceives from India. India maintains a substantial, and growing, conventional military advantage over Pakistan; Islamabad's nuclear and missile programs reflect its need to counterbalance this advantage. An enhanced F-16 program also has deterrence value by giving Pakistan time and space to employ a conventional, rather than nuclear, reaction in the event of a future conflict with India ."


So US considers F 16 as useful in Pakistan fighting conventional conflict rather than nuclear , and absence of F 16s as leaving Pakistan verging towards temptation of using nukes .
 

WARREN SS

New Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2013
Messages
5,570
Likes
20,878
Country flag
US ambassador AnnePatterson said this in 2008 according to wikileaks---

"Despite the current economic challenges Pakistan still feels the need to fully invest in its territorial defense. While Pakistan's F-16s certainly have a symbolic, and perhaps emotional, salience they are also directly tied to the existential threat Pakistan perceives from India. India maintains a substantial, and growing, conventional military advantage over Pakistan; Islamabad's nuclear and missile programs reflect its need to counterbalance this advantage. An enhanced F-16 program also has deterrence value by giving Pakistan time and space to employ a conventional, rather than nuclear, reaction in the event of a future conflict with India ."


So US considers F 16 as useful in Pakistan fighting conventional conflict rather than nuclear , and absence of F 16s as leaving Pakistan verging towards temptation of using nukes .
They offered Us F-16 blk 60 in 2007 itself To change status quo USA always has Two prolonged theory for every thing

2008 is the Same year US let us get NSG wavier
 

IndiaRising

New Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2014
Messages
2,788
Likes
9,593
Country flag
3rd time in 9 days paki security agencies have stopped international media to check the JeM madarssa.

They will eventually get exposed, in both Balakot bombing and F 16 lost
Reuters still peddling narrative that no damage has been done
 

patriots

Defense lover
New Member
Joined
Aug 23, 2017
Messages
5,706
Likes
21,817
Country flag
Today.....school were reopened.....
Will be closed....again.........
 

WARREN SS

New Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2013
Messages
5,570
Likes
20,878
Country flag
Posted by Falcon in SF.Org


Very personal opinion, which I mentioned earlier too, he(Wing.Cdr) broke the Rules of Engagement, which were merely to defend the Indian Airspace as no war had been declared by the GoI against Pakistan, in accordance to those existing which are designed to operate under the aegis of agreements entered into. The nature and scope of engagements is very clear to every service personnel, it does not depend on their whims and fancies to 'tweak' them as per wish.

When people question Su-30 MKIs not deploying the BVRAAMs, they forget that even PAF was using jammers and it takes time to 'burn' through jamming at those distances. Secondly, use of BVRAAM would have entailed a possible strike on a PAF aircraft say 4 kms on their side of LC, a technical violation by them and India being well within its rights to shoot down, but by the time a BVRAAM would have reached, the possibility of it being jammed and becoming harmless or 'killing' an aircraft which was egressing the zone and leading to wreckage falling well beyond the 10 km limit was equally high, both being a situation which had the potential to paint India as undertaking aggressive actions against PAF, thereby undermining Indian position of WoT to War on Pakistan. The ramifications in terms of diplomatic and military situation would have been far greater and adversarial.

Thirdly, he broke the protective cover being provided by Su-30 MKIs and in chase to get a kill, he crossed the LC and was shot. He was responsible for actions that he undertook and their consequences, unfortunately, affected the options the GoI had when PAF undertook an aggressive action in J&K.

Let me be very blunt and clear about it. I can still expect a youngster, with a few months of service, falling for such actions of 'kill' but not a Wing Commander with almost 14 plus years of service.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Articles

Top