India Pakistan conflict along LoC and counter terrorist operations

[kaaleshwaar]

So handles talking openly about some action..

 

[Srinivas_K]

No!

An oft repeated cliche but it is true. India has more Muslims than Pakistan

Pakistanis suffered from a faux superiority complex from Day 1 and under this disillusionment kept attacking us thinking they will get their way. Of course they couldn't. Had they minded their own business post partition and focused on their nation and development instead of religious crusades our relation could have been US - Canada or Australia-New Zealand like. But that opportunity has passed.

Indians and Pakistanis have one relation only i.e. enemity.

We are of course always open to more land (Pakistan) but no erstwhile occupants of said land (Pakistanis)

I think you are missing the main point here, Pakistan is formed for Muslim dominance in Indian subcontinent. It means war and wether it is low intensity or full scale wars they are bound to happen time to time.

Pakistan is a state of mind they think they inherit Mughal empire and think they Hindus are subjects, false superiority.
During earlier days after Pakistan formation, they declared Jihad on India and also went to USA for aid. This is still continuing even now.

An average Jihadi from Pakistan thinks he is a global Jihadi, he needs to fight with rest of the world. India is a low hanging fruit. Jihadi terror combined with drug trade in Pakistan is a billions of dollars of Industry. Entire narrative rests on Jihad and foreign funding in the name of Islam and strategic location.

 

[fire starter]

Long live TTP.

 

[lixun]

@lixun I think Chinese should do more research on Islam, maybe then you'll realize the ideological differences between pakis and you.

I just want to see how people living in South Asia understand each other. China believes in simple materialism and does not have a deep understanding of religion.

 

[DerBronzeLord]

I just want to see how people living in South Asia understand each other. China believes in simple materialism and does not have a deep understanding of religion.

Hindus in India do not hate !slam because our religion says so, but because their religion says that. They continue to attack us and try to take our land. The two religions, which have manifested in the form of two countries after 1947 as India and Pakistan, cannot co-exist, unless they return to Hinduism or any other non-Abrahamic religion like Sikhism or Buddhism. Kashmir isn't a flashpoint between India and Pakistan. Even if the Kashmir dispute were to be magically resolved tomorrow, there would still be an enmity between the two states.

 

[Lonewolf]

I just want to see how people living in South Asia understand each other. China believes in simple materialism and does not have a deep understanding of religion.

Looks it's getting simple here ,let me explain a nationalist indian ideology ,you wannna live with us ,no problem , you have to modify yourself According to our culture ,like persian refugees did earlier ,jews did earlier ,or Afghan refugees did , we have long history of islam invading our land , sometimes with a olive branch ,other time with armies , result was same women raped , men's slaughtered or converted , you wanna see more ,search about forced conversion in Pakistan or even in india .

Islam is more of a political ideology ,and it can't live in a multi party system ,it want to portray itself as a one sole group , you may find few exceptions ,but they are considered as equal to infidel like us .

You may convert in any way ,you will surely lose your heritage , culture , morality , and turn to a true savage jihadi ,see for Indonesia and Malaysia , their people are showing signs of turning rabid

 

[Tactical Doge]

I just want to see how people living in South Asia understand each other. China believes in simple materialism and does not have a deep understanding of religion.

Yes
That absence of deep understanding of Islam is why Uyghurs are being "Re-educated"
Personally I don't have a problem with it, I believe I can speak for rest of us as well

But we do Hypocrisy coz wE cHiNa biAtcH!!

 

[fooLIam]

If Pakistan is willing to join India but keep Islam, will India agree?

If Pakistan is willing to join India but keep Islam, will India agree?

Your flag is of Japan but name suggest chinese?

Looks it's getting simple here ,let me explain a nationalist indian ideology ,you wannna live with us ,no problem , you have to modify yourself According to our culture ,like persian refugees did earlier ,jews did earlier ,or Afghan refugees did , we have long history of islam invading our land , sometimes with a olive branch ,other time with armies , result was same women raped , men's slaughtered or converted , you wanna see more ,search about forced conversion in Pakistan or even in india .

Islam is more of a political ideology ,and it can't live in a multi party system ,it want to portray itself as a one sole group , you may find few exceptions ,but they are considered as equal to infidel like us .

You may convert in any way ,you will surely lose your heritage , culture , morality , and turn to a true savage jihadi ,see for Indonesia and Malaysia , their people are showing signs of turning rabid

Bhai,there is no need to reply or make it point of discussion, he is chinese wumao they aren't interested in what we think.

 

[Ayushraj]

C130 was real workhorse of pirki aur force for 50+ years. Even porki have modified it for bombing operations
But not now porki are buying Chinese transport plane that were even rejected by Bangladesh

 

[Maharaj samudragupt]

This is how the teacher who taught us the communist ideology course evaluated the Bajistans
If Pakistan is positioned as a Muslim and needs to be separated from Hindus, then it cannot explain the fact that there are more Muslims in India’s domestic life than Pakistan
If Pakistan is positioned as a Pakistani nation, then it cannot be explained that Bakistas and North Indians are so similar in customs
Therefore, Pakistan should emphasize Islam in Saudi Arabia and support Islamic extremism, "this is the way of life of Muslims."

Splendid explanation you teacher gave you

 

[Ayushraj]

Even if there were no British, Pakistan and India would split, right?

Maratha empire in 1757.marthas wer even eying to capture areas tamil nadu ,bengal and uttar pradesh from respective nawab.Even marathas were able to capture tamil nadu but lost after few years. 3 rd battle of panipat shattered dream of United india
If we would won 3 rd battle of panipat their would no porkistan and Bangladesh now

 

[TakAman]

I think you are missing the main point here, Pakistan is formed for Muslim dominance in Indian subcontinent. It means war and wether it is low intensity or full scale wars they are bound to happen time to time.

Pakistan is a state of mind they think they inherit Mughal empire and think they Hindus are subjects, false superiority.
During earlier days after Pakistan formation, they declared Jihad on India and also went to USA for aid. This is still continuing even now.

An average Jihadi from Pakistan thinks he is a global Jihadi, he needs to fight with rest of the world. India is a low hanging fruit. Jihadi terror combined with drug trade in Pakistan is a billions of dollars of Industry. Entire narrative rests on Jihad and foreign funding in the name of Islam and strategic location.

Lol.

That's a joke. First of all, Mughals came from central Asia.
Babur who was the first to establish Mughal Empire in India (in 1526), was a descendent of Genghis Khan (a man who conquered China, mid East, central Asia and most of Europe). And the biggest conqueror in past 1000 years

They are more central Asians and Turks and not mid Easters and Pakistanis.

Pakistanis or Indian Muslims are converts from Hinduism.

By the same logic, tomorrow they will start following Chinese culture language and religion and start feeling Chinese heritage and celebrating their achievements as Pakistanis achievements.

Rather, Mughal is just a Hindi way of speaking Mongol.

See the relationship between conqueror of China (Genghis Khan) and 3-4 Indian states (Babur):

Mughal-Mongol genealogy - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[Maharaj samudragupt]

Lol.

That's a joke. First of all, Mughals came from central Asia.
Babur who was the first to establish Mughal Empire in India (in 1526), was a descendent of Genghis Khan (a man who conquered China, mid East, central Asia and most of Europe). And the biggest conqueror in past 1000 years

They are more central Asians and Turks and not mid Easters and Pakistanis.

Pakistanis or Indian Muslims are converts from Hinduism.

By the same logic, tomorrow they will start following Chinese culture language and religion and start feeling Chinese heritage and celebrating their achievements as Pakistanis achievements.

Legit , your average central asian looked more like some one from North East .( Kind of ) and not like some one from poonjaub

 

[Automatic Kalashnikov]

Maratha empire in 1757.marthas wer even eying to capture areas tamil nadu ,bengal and uttar pradesh from respective nawab.Even marathas were able to capture tamil nadu but lost after few years. 3 rd battle of panipat shattered dream of United india
If we would won 3 rd battle of panipat their would no porkistan and Bangladesh now

View attachment 93965

Had the Marathas not made the decision to go beyond Delhi to Panipat, today India's map could have been different

 

[TakAman]

Maratha empire in 1757.marthas wer even eying to capture areas tamil nadu ,bengal and uttar pradesh from respective nawab.Even marathas were able to capture tamil nadu but lost after few years. 3 rd battle of panipat shattered dream of United india
If we would won 3 rd battle of panipat their would no porkistan and Bangladesh now

View attachment 93965

Though I must add that Maratha Empire was not the first one to attempt united India.

Mohammed bin Tughlaq, in Tughlaq dynasty also tried that. Before the Mughal Empire, during the time of Delhi Sultanate.

Though they lost to Vijaynagar Empire later on.

The map of India in 1331 was united for about 20 odd years. See the blow video @8:42


That was the largest united india in Indian history, followed by Maratha empire in 1757.

 

[Srinivas_K]

Maratha empire in 1757.marthas wer even eying to capture areas tamil nadu ,bengal and uttar pradesh from respective nawab.Even marathas were able to capture tamil nadu but lost after few years. 3 rd battle of panipat shattered dream of United india
If we would won 3 rd battle of panipat their would no porkistan and Bangladesh now

View attachment 93965

Marathas regrouped and went up to Attock, after the third battle of panipat. Panipat is a temporary pause for Marathas.

 

[Ayushraj]

Marathas regrouped and went up to Attock, after the third battle of panipat. Panipat is a temporary pause for Marathas.

Peshwa madhavrao went upto Sutlej river after 10 years
In1830 Lion of Punjab Ranjit Singh went upto jamurad in Afghanistan.. Even dogra general jorawar singh kicked Chinese out of maansarovar. Pla forces still makes their strategy after reading jorawar singh
Those who doubt Indians must read about Rajendra chola who went upto Vietnam.
They can also read about Latitadiya who conquered central asia

 

[Cheran]

Thread. Status = Derailed

 

[Maharaj samudragupt]

Though I must add that Maratha Empire was not the first one to attempt united India.

Mohammed bin Tughlaq, in Tughlaq dynasty also tried that. Before the Mughal Empire, during the time of Delhi Sultanate.

Though they lost to Vijaynagar Empire later on.

The map of India in 1331 was united for about 20 odd years. See the blow video @8:42


That was the largest united india in Indian history, followed by Maratha empire in 1757.

A better version of the same .

 

[Maharaj samudragupt]

Though I must add that Maratha Empire was not the first one to attempt united India.

Mohammed bin Tughlaq, in Tughlaq dynasty also tried that. Before the Mughal Empire, during the time of Delhi Sultanate.

Though they lost to Vijaynagar Empire later on.

The map of India in 1331 was united for about 20 odd years. See the blow video @8:42


That was the largest united india in Indian history, followed by Maratha empire in 1757.

For your last couple of sentences, I take grevious possible exception and must say that , you have willfully ignored the mauryans.