Jimih
Senior Member
- Joined
- May 20, 2021
- Messages
- 22,994
- Likes
- 134,627
![Singapore Country flag](https://defenceforumindia.com/misc/flags/shiny/32/Singapore.png)
Well that was a perfect analysis of the events post 2014.it was about giving Pakistan every opportunity to change course, so that no one can say India was not serious with trying to stabilise the situation. started with NS invitation to Modi’s inauguration along with SAARC leaders, then surprise visit to NS granddaughter’s wedding, then another SAARC leaders visit, even niyazi before getting elected met with Modi. every opportunity was given including allowing ISI to come to one of our bases.
But paki establishment responded to this with terror strikes. GoI did not withhold their response.
Even when these gestures being made, IA did not hold back their response. most people think India’s military response started after first surgical strike, response started in dec 2014 itself. there is a DGISPR press briefing from late 2014 early 2015 where he says to paki journalists the kind of shelling IA is doing is more than 1971 war’s shelling. the mortar shelling count was around 30,000 mortars per day from our side during the CFV duels. then our responses started escalating from mortars to 155mm to first surgical strike to balakot strike.
all these years, GoI said only thing common on all it’s diplomatic engagements with any country or international forum, cross border terrorism. you can check any MEA bilateral or multilateral statement or agreement from 2014 to 2019, it will be there. even with EU countries.
entire sequence of events was consequential and focused not random.
What's your personal take on the current missile incident?
Ok, you just stated that it was a 'strike 2' (baseball analogy) for IAF in your books.