Check the first comment of this vid “Their is always two side of one single incident, we must think of all aspects ...”
Right after 2020 Galwan conflict, i said the PLA controlled the battlefield, nobody believed me, now the recent leaked video just after conflict proved my words.
Right after 2020 Galwan conflict, i said the PLA controlled the battlefield, nobody believed me, now the recent leaked video just after conflict proved my words.
You didn't even know for a year that you guys had casualties in Galwan. I even saw Chinese chest-thumping that no Chinese died and 20 Indians were killed.
Never saw you mentioning Chinese KIA or injuries before the official acceptance of 4 killed by the CCP.
Whereas Indian media already reported about the situation with the casualties on the Indian side along with names of the deceased and also with an estimated number of Chinese casualties.
On 22 June a report was published in India which clearly depicted the situation shown in videos released by the wumaos.
It also reported about India handing back 17 dead bodies of Chinese soldiers.
Later Indian Corps and Commander and recently ex Chief Of Army Staff said on record that Chinese casualties are much higher then reported by CCP.
Plenty has been written so far about the clash between Indian and Chinese troops in Ladakh's Galwan Valley. But India Today brings you the most detailed account of the brutal June 15 Galwan battle.
www.indiatoday.in
Looks like Chinese control of battalefield means Chinese Batallion Commander equivalent to IA's Colonel killed and a Regimental Commander equivalent to IA's Brigadier rank gravely injured
Yes, there are two sides to a single incident just like galwan has two sides.