semantics...China crossed the line* against India... Just a little correction...
Let me remind you my dear fellow that, yudh hi to veerta ki praram hai, we may loos we may gain but before war who is the desire. Hum haar gaye to sikhenge or jeet gaye to or jeetenge. Jai HindI support the return of status quo ante as of April 2020.
But if we do not vacate some of the peaks occupied recently as a concession for the PLA withdrawing from all its new positions in Pangong Tso, Depsang etc why will the Chinese consider any agreement.
I know various Indian Governments have frittered away the gains made by our army by returning captured territory be it Haji Pir or other areas. Not the most optimum course of action.
But China is different from Pakistan. Do we really want to annex Chinese controlled land on a permanent basis now. Might result in all out war. Are we ready?. The Chinese might just decide to escalate to the nuclear level. Are we ready?.
If an all out war had already broken out and we made territorial gains then we are fully justified in retaining the captured land. It will count as war gains.
But if a peaceful resolution happens wherein we do not lose any territory and go back to April 2020 positions, should we insist on holding on to the newly captured enemy land.
It is one thing to punish an aggressor and teach him a lesson and quite another to permanently grab his land. China is not Pakistan. We know the Chinese have grabbed Aksai Chin(Hind) and other areas but as of now they have a much larger economy and military and a total war will not be easy. If India at present had a 10 trillion dollars economy I and everyone would support any aggressive action by India. So it is a dicey situation and may be we should be cautious.
But even if we reach an agreement we should guard against Chinese treachery. They might make an attempt to capture all the peaks that we vacate. We need to have contingency plans to counter possible Chinese moves. Only if we are sure we can manage the situation only then we should proceed forward with any peace agreement.
The Government I am sure will consider all aspects before arriving at any possible peace agreement.
I don't know. War is serious business. The Chinese economy has reached a plateau and may never return to double digit growth whereas India has the potential to grow even at 10% for the next decade.Do we want to risk it.That's how you play poker....time to call the bluff....win or lose.
I saw that too ,
Whats this left and right blacktop?
You are over estimating China, I think we have good strategists in current govt and very experienced army...I trust if they made a move they did some risk analysis and also we are not the one pushing for war. They are....the press hype you see is not GOI official communication to Chinese government....don't take it at face value.I don't know. War is serious business. The Chinese economy has reached a plateau and may never return to double digit growth whereas India has the potential to grow even at 10% for the next decade.Do we want to risk it.
If it were Pakistan we know we can manage whatever they throw at us.
Status quo ante as of april 2020 will not solve and will never solve any of the issue that India faces : pak, nepal, bengla and china.I support the return of status quo ante as of April 2020.
But if we do not vacate some of the peaks occupied recently as a concession for the PLA withdrawing from all its new positions in Pangong Tso, Depsang etc why will the Chinese consider any agreement.
I know various Indian Governments have frittered away the gains made by our army by returning captured territory be it Haji Pir or other areas. Not the most optimum course of action.
But China is different from Pakistan. Do we really want to annex Chinese controlled land on a permanent basis now. Might result in all out war. Are we ready?. The Chinese might just decide to escalate to the nuclear level. Are we ready?.
If an all out war had already broken out and we made territorial gains then we are fully justified in retaining the captured land. It will count as war gains.
But if a peaceful resolution happens wherein we do not lose any territory and go back to April 2020 positions, should we insist on holding on to the newly captured enemy land.
It is one thing to punish an aggressor and teach him a lesson and quite another to permanently grab his land. China is not Pakistan. We know the Chinese have grabbed Aksai Chin(Hind) and other areas but as of now they have a much larger economy and military and a total war will not be easy. If India at present had a 10 trillion dollars economy I and everyone would support any aggressive action by India. So it is a dicey situation and may be we should be cautious.
But even if we reach an agreement we should guard against Chinese treachery. They might make an attempt to capture all the peaks that we vacate. We need to have contingency plans to counter possible Chinese moves. Only if we are sure we can manage the situation only then we should proceed forward with any peace agreement.
The Government I am sure will consider all aspects before arriving at any possible peace agreement.
They aren't happy with Xi's hostility towards everyone, he has made it obvious by now."Then again globalist liberals were happy with the greedy money-over-everything old CCP, they don't like Xi putting a spoke in their wheel every now and then "
That sentence had some undertones for me and his message to likes ratio but I could be wrong....I noticed some troll's are very subtle on this forum. May be I made a mistake in interpreting....
Porkers are finished, it is very comedic to see Immy begging at UNSC and in foreign countries about muh atrocities in Kashmir, their jihad has failed, their NC and PDP puppets neutralized, and a direct retaliation from the Indian armed forces over any big stunt they pull with their jihadisFor once, Indian Govt. has ignored China's rent boy Pakistan and gone straight for his masters throat.
Why .. what about K-5 ?
Agree with you, I'll only add that they will also claim Andaman island.I don't see negotiations with China bearing any fruit whether at military level or at diplomatic level.
If we gift away Arunachal tomorrow, they will raise Sikkim as a new contentious issue. Day after, it could be the Chinese colony in Kolkata or elsewhere in India.
For once, Indian Govt. has ignored China's rent boy Pakistan and gone straight for his masters throat.
They haven't been in a war in the last 20 years.You are over estimating China, I think we have good strategists in current govt and very experienced army...I trust if they made a move they did some risk analysis and also we are not the one pushing for war. They are....the press hype you see is not GOI official communication to Chinese government....don't take it at face value.
I will risk, economy is never an issue hum isse bhi boore wakt main rah chuke hain, and do you garenti that if we not fight we will be a 13 trillion economy by 2030.I don't know. War is serious business. The Chinese economy has reached a plateau and may never return to double digit growth whereas India has the potential to grow even at 10% for the next decade.Do we want to risk it.
If it were Pakistan we know we can manage whatever they throw at us.
Need your feedback before i buy my copy.... @ezsasaS JaiShankar’s book The India Way has come today
View attachment 58350
You can grow the economy back, especially with the "spurt" in growth right after the war.I don't know. War is serious business. The Chinese economy has reached a plateau and may never return to double digit growth whereas India has the potential to grow even at 10% for the next decade.Do we want to risk it.
If it were Pakistan we know we can manage whatever they throw at us.
Any war against a power like China.. will be fought under an emergency.. I dont mean skirmishes here.. but a war against China..You can grow the economy back, especially with the "spurt" in growth right after the war.
What you should be worried about is the domestic situation during the war, the mediawalas, the opposition parties, the specific religious group that wants Sharia and Khilafat, Naxalites, those secessionist groups in the North East.
Enemies within and without want Modi out, what better opportunity than to cripple India's ability to effectively fight a war than with internal strife, ultimately resulting in a loss and the demoralization that follows.
The Government of India does not share your view.It is laughable to think that they will go back, no matter what we do outside of a proper war.
It is very good the IA or ITBP took over those mountain tops, the Chinese should get the message we will not go down without a fight, we will not pullback from our own land.
Hopefully this will result in a heavy militarization of the entire LAC, and Arunachal, Sikkim borders also, just like the LOC.
Salami slicing has never occured on the LOC now has it? because the swines on the other end know they will be shot, they tried during Kargil and we all know what happened to them
I would request military professionals to join the discussion on whether we should insist on all out war. Since they are the ones who will fight their opinion is important.They haven't been in a war in the last 20 years.
They haven't faced proxy wars and insurgencies like our troops have in Kashmir or those Naxal/Maoist infested areas.
All their bluster is over their industrial capacity, and their ability to make equipment somewhat on par with US/EU/Russia by their whole industrial espionage setup, and "2nd Largest Economy".
They have materiel, but do they have the men?
40 years of prosperity has made them soft.
They also have a good spying network i think, but i'm not sure if this is their own or outsourced to their IronBrotherSlave
Whats that?
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
India-China 2020 Border conflict | Indian Army | 29497 | ||
V | Non-Military implications of India-China Standoff 2020 | China | 61 | |
Memes & Jokes India China Standoff 2020 | Members Corner | 334 | ||
India to overtake China in 2020: Swaminathan Aiyar | Economy & Infrastructure | 33 |