AmoghaVarsha
New Member
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2016
- Messages
- 1,376
- Likes
- 2,096
Humne bhala phenka, to phir Beijing tak jayega.
Humne bhala phenka, to phir Beijing tak jayega.
They will respond most probably at Despang where they hold advantage.Do you think we will fire artillery, what are the chances that we are going to escalate?
Not really. Despang topograpghy favours us according to the @HellfireThey will respond most probably at Despang where they hold advantage.
These tweets aren't meant for us.was he sitting in the meeting room with Ninda Ji?
I wouldn’t say the GOI set out to confuse all as you seem to imply, I suggest their primary aim is to control the narrative by controlling how and when information from the front line is released.So basically, you are saying GoI has managed to keep everybody confused. Isn’t it a good thing?
We've got an entire armoured brigade in the vicinity plus an indep armd regiment waiting for those Chinese tin cans! Add to that the Apaches waiting to draw blood!In case China retaliates it will do in the sector in which it os strong. So it's likely the thrust will come from Depsang area. The area should be mined extensively against Chinese tanks.
Your answer lies in the question itself.what happens now ?
Can they use drones + precision guided bombs to dislodge our troops ?
I think they been battle testing their drones in Yemen and Syria .
Its low risk , even if we shoot a drone down , wont be much of a loss for them .
Can someone knowledgeable comment on it ?
To be honest more than 80 % o twitter osints and experts are just speculating. Though I wish it was true.Je baaat
Everyone here is cautiously optimistic about the outcomes.The issue is the GOI is, rightfully in my view, tightly controlling information from the frontlines. To fill the infor vacuum especially in his 24/7 infor age, people are filling the gaps in multiple ways:
- Some twits on Twitter are speculating or extrapolating or fabricating. Others are reading and aping these.
- Some journos with good or deep sources are reporting basic facts and filling up rest of the news with hyperbole etc. Other journos are wallowing in their mediocrity.
- Military analyst are relishing being alive although armed with half facts some can be very dangerous.
- Insecure types hyperventilate.
- ignorant types remain blissful.
- Forums like this are a mixture of all the above.
Ordinary punter like me has to wade through all the chaff to find some semblance of the truth.
No Confirmation from Govt. But all Onsit Handles Stating that Spanggur Gap belong to us now.The Chinese had built a road from Rudok in Tibet right up to the Spanggur Gap. The road linked the gap with China’s National Highway 219 (that runs through occupied Ladakh and connects Xinjiang to Lhatse in Tibet) and was tankable. If we have captured Spanggur Gap, (I'm not sure we have so far, but according to inside info, we have) it would choke Chinese armoured movements in the area.
View attachment 57644
View attachment 57645
Map courtesy: Swarajya.
Thing is the area is highly sensitive.. There are reports of Heavy Chinese deployment beyond Karakaoram. I guess Panag pointed out that Karakaoram pass is wide enough to move Artillery & mechanized infantry as well. So it's likely going to be two front attack there. So there is a mechanical brigade sitting at Qizil langar & the other one may come through Karakoram.We've got an entire armoured brigade in the vicinity plus an indep armd regiment waiting for those Chinese tin cans! Add to that the Apaches waiting to draw blood!
According to GOI those areas belong to us. So why would they admit anything.No Confirmation from Govt. But all Onsit Handles Stating that Spanggur Gap belong to us now.
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
India-China 2020 Border conflict | Indian Army | 29497 | ||
V | Non-Military implications of India-China Standoff 2020 | China | 61 | |
Memes & Jokes India China Standoff 2020 | Members Corner | 334 | ||
India to overtake China in 2020: Swaminathan Aiyar | Economy & Infrastructure | 33 |