Bhurki
New Member
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2018
- Messages
- 1,301
- Likes
- 1,765
Instituional memory is why bureaucracy exists. The reason for having an IAS, IFS officer be in charge of a certain institution is that it ascertains some sort of passover of previous policy decisions and future trends to every new government.Once it recognizes an enemy the US deep state has a consistent policy irrespective of the party in power at the White House or the US Legislature. The other side of the coin also holds true when the US recognizes a friend, it overlooks many shortcomings in that friend. Cuba is a prime example of the former where it's role in hosting Soviet missiles that threatened the survival of the US has not been forgotten for decades and of course the former USSR where the US did not rest until the Soviet bloc and the Soviet Union were dismantled. Pakistan is an example of the latter. The help in Afghanistan in defeating the USSR and driving them out and the opening up to China for Nixon/Kissinger bought Pakistan a very long rope where many of it's subsequent sins have been brushed under the carpet. US policies towards these countries were consistent over decades irrespective of which party was in power.
In India on the other hand, every PM comes to power thinking that he will be able to do something which none of his predecessors have been able to do i.e peace with Pakistan and to appease China ignoring history because there is no institutional memory. After being punched in the teeth a few times, they all come to their senses. There is no institutional commitment to recognize China and Pakistan as enemies which they are and to work towards their defeat by whatever means including alliances if needed. Unfortunately ideology trumps common sense. "Strategic autonomy" is preferably to "alliance", even if strategic autonomy allows the Chinese and Pakistan sores to fester.
These men are 'supposed' to remind every new policymaker of the results of past decisions and correct course for future. But the fact that most of the bureaucracy depends on the political people in a really unruly manner doesn't just take away the independent capabilities of these men and the institutions they hold, but also cripples the decision makers almost entirely of any internal governmental past experiences, unless one explicitly asks for them.